What's new

Top Saudi Arabian scholar says Muslims may pray in churches and synagogues

You can do whatever you want to. I am not holding your back nor do I frankly (if I am to be honest here) care.

Why are you blabbering about suicide bombings out of a sudden? Clerics in KSA have never supported it. KSA was one of the first countries to denounce it when the first modern suicide bombings occurred in Lebanon in the early 1980's.

Qatar is in fact the one hosting clerics that openly support such acts.

Watch the great and eloquent Adel al-Jubeir in action below;
I am not blaming KSA for any suicide bombings and Neither I believe Qatar has to do any thing with it. I am just saying about additions to Islam cannot be done may it be a Saudi Qatari Irani or Pakistani cleric no one can do that so you cannot go to a church. If it is expensive to make mosques make it with just clay Allah will be more happy.
An Image of a small mosque. The people who go to Pray here are also Muslims and they are also equal in eyes of Allah to the people who go to a lavish Mosque.
1200px-2011-0209-Al_Badiyah_Mosque.jpg
 
.
I am not blaming KSA for any suicide bombings and Neither I believe Qatar has to do any thing with it. I am just saying about additions to Islam cannot be done may it be a Saudi Qatari Irani or Pakistani cleric no one can do that so you cannot go to a church. If it is expensive to make mosques make it with just clay Allah will be more happy.
An Image of a small mosque. The people who go to Pray here are also Muslims and they are also equal in eyes of Allah to the people who go to a lavish Mosque.
1200px-2011-0209-Al_Badiyah_Mosque.jpg

I am not sure what we are discussing anymore. What exactly are you objecting to in what was said by the cleric (Sheikh al-Manea)? Because honestly I don't see any problem.

Actually and unfortunately it is a fact that Qatar hosts radical "clerics" who openly support suicide bombings. I can prove this using Arabic videos.

I can prove that the hideous propaganda terrorist central (Al-Jazeera), especially the Arabic version, (Qatar's pamphlet) is the main mainstream media used and watched by radical individuals.

OBL's diary confirms this. Captured Daesh elements too. Radicals jailed in KSA also state that they watch this channel. Frankly speaking it should be completely banned as it has been in the Arab countries boycotting Qatar until they change their pathetic discourse.

Al-Jazeera has become a propaganda channel sadly. That was not always the case. The amount of lies that they have written against KSA since June alone is something that cannot be taken lightly.

Elements in the region who support Qatar should be ashamed and think more than once.

Such mosques are beautiful and there are plenty of them across the Muslim world. Most ordinary mosques are not some grand structures.
 
Last edited:
.
I am not sure what we are discussing anymore. What exactly are you objecting to in what was said by the cleric (Sheik al-Manea)? Because honestly I don't see any problem.

Actually and unfortunately it is a fact that Qatar hosts radical "clerics" who openly support suicide bombings.

I am saying is that the Saudi cleric is wrong if he sending Muslims to church and declaring it as allowed with out any example from the life of Holy Prophet (PBUH), Quran Pak or Hadis. I am saying you cannot add any thing to Islam.
The point i mentioned suicide bomber was that some extreim clerics tell muslim to commit suicide bombings are wrong as suicide is Haram in Islam and is a crime. If you want to fight oppression fight it openly suicide is not allowed. There can be no addition to Islam by any one no matter what his post is he is not the Prophet of Islam.
 
.
I am saying is that the Saudi cleric is wrong if he sending Muslims to church and declaring it as allowed with out any example from the life of Holy Prophet (PBUH), Quran Pak or Hadis. I am saying you cannot add any thing to Islam.
The point i mentioned suicide bomber was that some extreim clerics tell muslim to commit suicide bombings are wrong as suicide is Haram in Islam and is a crime. If you want to fight oppression fight it openly suicide is not allowed. There can be no addition to Islam by any one no matter what his post is he is not the Prophet of Islam.

Did you read the article?

Umar ibn al-Khattab (ra) (I am sure that you and most Muslims, especially educated ones, are well aware of his status in Islam) did pray in churches in Palestine. Prophet Muhammad (saws) engaged with Christian and Jewish communities in Arabia and outside of it. Prophet Muhammad (saws) even married an Christian lady. The earliest generations of Muslims did not level churches or synagogues to the ground rather they respected them and left them alone. The most revered/holy sites in Judaism and Christianity were left alone.

Yes, that is wrong and has nothing to do with Islam as established by all available facts and knowledge that we can have.

Actually this topic has been answered already:

Can a Muslim Pray in a Church or a Synagogue?

Questioner
Joba

Reply Date
Oct 18, 2017

Question
As-salamu `alaykum. I am currently living in a non-Muslim country. I wonder whether it is allowed for a Muslim to perform prayer in a Church or not. I have heard that Muslims are not allowed to perform prayer in churches and other people’s places of worship. To what extent such saying is true?

Mufti
Dr. Muzammil H. Siddiqi and Dr. `Abdul-Fattah Idrees

Wa`alaykumas-salaamu warahmatullahi wabarakatuh.

In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.

All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger.

In this fatwa:

1- Islam is the religion of easiness.

2- A Muslim is allowed to perform prayer in a church if he is forced to pray there.

3- If a Muslim prays in a church without necessity his prayer is valid but still it is reprehensible or makruh.

4- Whenever the necessity warrants a Muslim to perform prayer in a church, he should obtain the prior permission of the church authorities as Islam respects other people’s places of worship.

The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is reported to have said: “I have been given five things that no one has been given before me… (Among them is that) the earth has been made for me as a Mosque and a source of purification. So if any man from my nation realizes that he has to pray, then he may pray.” (Al-Bukhari)

It is clear from the aforementioned Prophetic hadith that the whole earth is considered as a mosque for Muslims and a place for performing Salah and prostration.

However, it is better for one to stay away from those places (such as a church or a synagogue) out of fear of doubtful matters. If one finds it extremely difficult to find a place to perform prayer except for a church or a synagogue, and he performs salah in them then one’s prayer is valid as the whole earth is for Allah and all of it is considered a mosque (i.e., meaning a place to perform prayer and to prostrate) for all Muslims. It is reported that `Umar Ibn Al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him) refused to pray inside the church and he prayed outside it in order to ward off any false notions that may occur to the minds of ordinary Muslims who may be enticed to pray at the exact place where `Umar performed prayer (i.e., inside the church).

Answering the question, Dr. `Abdul-Fattah Idrees, professor of Comparative Jurisprudence at Al-Azhar University states:

A traveling Muslim may be allowed to perform prayer in a church if he failed to recognize a nearby mosque on his way. It is not necessary that a Muslim who does not know the mosque to perform prayer in a church as there are many other places to perform prayer.

The reason why it is not recommended for a Muslim to pray in a church is that a Muslim praying there may be distracted during performing prayer by the crosses, statues as well other Christian symbols drawn on the wall of the church.

Dr. Muzzamil Siddiqi, the former president of the Fiqh Council of North America (FCNA), concludes:

It is permissible to pray in any place, as long the place is clean (tahir). However, praying in a church, temple or any other religious place without any necessity is makruh.

It is possible that some people of those religions may not like to see us praying in their places of worship and we should not hurt other people’s feelings. If we have to pray in those places then we should take proper permission from the authorities that govern those sanctuaries.​

Allah Almighty knows best.

http://aboutislam.net/counseling/ask-the-scholar/prayer/can-muslim-pray-church-synagogue/

You are going against the consensus as I see it.

Anyway as I said, this discussion is not important.
 
.
It's halal, don't worry.

https://islamqa.info/en/147007



Salafism has always considered this fine, provided certain guidelines are met.

https://islamqa.info/en/147007

It's not halal as per the link you provided, it's makrooh as mentioned in the link.

I don't understand that why we Muslims have these esteem issues and for some reason always try to prove that we are tolerant and be apologetic for whatever things relating to islam? If someone consider Islam as good and tolerant religion; good enough, otherwise it's their problem. In my opinion; we should not go beyond certain point to make certain people happy, to be enlightened in their eyes, when in reality they don't give a damn.
 
.
It's not halal as per the link you provided, it's makrooh as mentioned in the link.

I don't understand that why we Muslims have these esteem issues and for some reason always try to prove that we are tolerant and be apologetic for whatever things relating to islam? If someone consider Islam as good and tolerant religion; good enough, otherwise it's their problem. In my opinion; we should not go beyond certain point to make certain people happy, to be enlightened in their eyes, when in reality they don't give a damn.

Look at the wider picture. Read post 3 for instance.

So when Muslim clerics are following their own tradition (in this case not considering prayers in churches or synagogues as a sin necessarily) it has something to do with "esteem"?

So when Christians, Jews, Hindus and others want to have interfaith dialogues with Muslim nations, KSA for instance (most recently some Lebanese Archbishop visited KSA), they have esteem problems?

Dialogue and trying to find solutions is the most sane answer to many if not most of our problems and challenges.

I really can't see a problem at all.

Have purists and what I would consider as radicals (personally) not done enough of harm? Are we now going to fight over nonsense?
 
Last edited:
.
Actually and unfortunately it is a fact that Qatar hosts radical "clerics" who openly support suicide bombings. I can prove this using Arabic videos.

I can prove that the hideous propaganda terrorist central (Al-Jazeera), especially the Arabic version, (Qatar's pamphlet) is the main mainstream media used and watched by radical individuals.

Al-Jazeera has become a propaganda channel sadly. That was not always the case. The amount of lies that they have written against KSA since June alone is something that cannot be taken lightly.

Elements in the region who support Qatar should be ashamed and think more than once.

Al Jazeera definitely has propaganda, as with Al-Arabiya, CNN, Egyptian state media, AFP, etc... Al Jazeera has upped the ante lately with the Qatari-GCC feud publishing things about KSA that they normally wouldn't. Like severe disagreement within Saudi Royal Family or MBS visiting Israel , etc.... Believe me, I recognize everything just as you are. And I recognize everything right and wrong in other conflicts or feuds in the region, or with parties in my country, or anywhere else. I'm just not talking about it, because I have no more energy for these matters and the stubborn people who insist their biased position is right and what not. So just to assure you, I'm not ignorant to matters that are of concern to you that you believe other Arabs are not taking seriously or knowledgeable of. And that feeds to your nation's and peoples paranoia.

What would help is if most people made an effort to not let their biases take over and pretend like one side is right. There is no right side in what is going on. And that doesn't necessarily pertain to Islamic perspective of what is right or wrong. We can all recognize propaganda or peoples agendas and there is a sense of right and wrong that we are capable of recognizing. Unfortunately, if these wrongs are identified, opponents play the 'according to your religion' card or something implying that coming to an conclusion of what is right or wrong is biased on religious bias. Which is done on purpose so those people can be shutdown. An example, Al-Arabiya also does propaganda on an equal level let's say. Now if I go say this on an Arab forum(that you are aware of), they will bring up the usual rhetoric about security, extremism, development , etc... as some kind of smokescreen and they are enabling wrongdoing if they don't allow us to address it. And that is on the internet, now imagine in person if you're living in one of these country's and trying to convince people, good luck to you, you are going to run into some legal trouble and if not, become a social outcast.

And back to that smokescreen thing, someone is employing with that you in this thread. And you aren't sure how to go about it besides divert attention unto Qatar. And I don't blame you, that technique(smokescreen tactic) is powerful and it is employed by the masses, and you wonder why we are in a situation like we are today. I don't mean only the ME, I mean the whole world too. People have normalized wrongdoing and ill intention and banished justice, etc.... So for most people they will read my post and think what the heck is this guy is rambling about, he's overthinking things or yada yada.... Because they refuse to take a step back and rethink things, and let go of their severe biases which are forming their reality for them and makes them feel as if they are in the right when they aren't.

My advice to you and to everyone reading, I'm not requesting you go out publicly and express good opinions or call out peoples biases, or get in legal trouble. Or have your family/friends shame you for condemning certain aspects/behaviors of your or another government you look up to. But, on your own and to yourself, at least reflect about this when you can, and understand that you have to look at things fairly and be able to get yourself to support what is right, instead of people over and over again praising wrongdoings of many governments or people in general. And trying to present a case that so and so is on the right path or so and so nation bloc's are those who support Islam and the truth and what not.

Just think about that, if you guys want change, a lot of this distress we are causing for ourselves is unnecessary but because we are stubborn and biased, we enable it further. Nothing will change it unless we change ourselves. And yes that means beginning to adopt fair and right positions or opinions on matters and stating them publicly. That is the least we can do. And I suspect you will respond with a post reminding me that things aren't so bleak and that yeah reform will take time and what not, no need for that my friend. I just believe you are able to recognize wrongdoing just by reading or observing something. You just have some insecurities(which all of us have, not personal life ones, I mean political ones) of opening up and admitting some things are wrong from both sides as the predators will take advantage of this and use it against you. That being one of the reasons. But, I believe you can reach a point where personally and to yourself you can recognize what is right or wrong and there is no need to go out of your way to mention that if it causes you more trouble than you can handle. Some others I have no faith in as they are stubborn and insist they are rightly guided even when they're clearly wrong. Being right is not a matter of perspective, it's a clear truth. We have turned it into a perspective and this allows people to not turn back on what they insist.

Now you can imagine if people on this forum at least would try to speak out on what is right and wrong, there would be majority consensus that would inspire others to change, that would eventually force wrongdoers into the corner and at that point they would need to reform. But, I honestly don't believe all the current administrations can clean their record/image. I don't trust them 110% for anything, we need to work from a new start, literally. All of you are naive if you believe change can come from within those governments...and then those who believe Iranian gov't or other gov't(every single one) in region are rightly guided or suitable to lead lives of millions of peoples, I don't even know what to call them ....
 
.
It's not halal as per the link you provided, it's makrooh as mentioned in the link.

I don't understand that why we Muslims have these esteem issues and for some reason always try to prove that we are tolerant and be apologetic for whatever things relating to islam? If someone consider Islam as good and tolerant religion; good enough, otherwise it's their problem. In my opinion; we should not go beyond certain point to make certain people happy, to be enlightened in their eyes, when in reality they don't give a damn.

Makruh still means it's permissible.

Yes, I agree, we shouldn't feel the need to please others who won't be pleased no matter what and quite frankly, couldn't care less.
 
.
I am reading all and I am also talking about what is not being written. They Christians are heavily divided and Catholics that are associated with Roman church are the people who worship statues and I know more than your Saudi cleric what I am talking about. I know the whole history of Roman Catholic church.

Looks like you are a scholar of the Roman Catholic Church, but when it comes to Islam in the West, you are not so knowledgeable.

You know that it is against the law to build a mosque with a minaret in Switzerland, right? You know that mosques in the US face considerable difficulties when it comes to construction, right?

Zoning laws are used to prevent Muslims from using the land. If the land can be zoned, then access to water, electricity, sewerage may be denied. City councils have heated meeting about not having a mosque in "my backyard." Laws against Shariah laws are routinely passed at the state legislature level. When the mosque that is now 50 years old cannot accommodate all worshippers on a Friday, they start to pray on the street. Then laws are passed at the local level to prevent praying on the street.

You know all this don't you, BHarwana?

So when Muslims in the West are faced with these issues, they look for alternatives. The easy alternative is to buy a church. It is already built, zoned, non-profit, non-residential, non-business entity with water, electricity, and sewerage all provided. It even has a large parking lot. And it is not being used. The Church is happy to sell the building in the city where Muslims are, and move to some small community where people still go to church every Sunday.

Muslims buy these properties and convert them to a mosque. The fatwa simply legitimizes this issue so that people like you don't raise a stink.

Get it, now?

When you visit the US, I would be happy to take you to a local "church" on Friday.
 
.
Al Jazeera definitely has propaganda, as with Al-Arabiya, CNN, Egyptian state media, AFP, etc... Al Jazeera has upped the ante lately with the Qatari-GCC feud publishing things about KSA that they normally wouldn't. Like severe disagreement within Saudi Royal Family or MBS visiting Israel , etc.... Believe me, I recognize everything just as you are. And I recognize everything right and wrong in other conflicts or feuds in the region, or with parties in my country, or anywhere else. I'm just not talking about it, because I have no more energy for these matters and the stubborn people who insist their biased position is right and what not. So just to assure you, I'm not ignorant to matters that are of concern to you that you believe other Arabs are not taking seriously or knowledgeable of. And that feeds to your nation's and peoples paranoia.

What would help is if most people made an effort to not let their biases take over and pretend like one side is right. There is no right side in what is going on. And that doesn't necessarily pertain to Islamic perspective of what is right or wrong. We can all recognize propaganda or peoples agendas and there is a sense of right and wrong that we are capable of recognizing. Unfortunately, if these wrongs are identified, opponents play the 'according to your religion' card or something implying that coming to an conclusion of what is right or wrong is biased on religious bias. Which is done on purpose so those people can be shutdown. An example, Al-Arabiya also does propaganda on an equal level let's say. Now if I go say this on an Arab forum(that you are aware of), they will bring up the usual rhetoric about security, extremism, development , etc... as some kind of smokescreen and they are enabling wrongdoing if they don't allow us to address it. And that is on the internet, now imagine in person if you're living in one of these country's and trying to convince people, good luck to you, you are going to run into some legal trouble and if not, become a social outcast.

And back to that smokescreen thing, someone is employing with that you in this thread. And you aren't sure how to go about it besides divert attention unto Qatar. And I don't blame you, that technique(smokescreen tactic) is powerful and it is employed by the masses, and you wonder why we are in a situation like we are today. I don't mean only the ME, I mean the whole world too. People have normalized wrongdoing and ill intention and banished justice, etc.... So for most people they will read my post and think what the heck is this guy is rambling about, he's overthinking things or yada yada.... Because they refuse to take a step back and rethink things, and let go of their severe biases which are forming their reality for them and makes them feel as if they are in the right when they aren't.

My advice to you and to everyone reading, I'm not requesting you go out publicly and express good opinions or call out peoples biases, or get in legal trouble. Or have your family/friends shame you for condemning certain aspects/behaviors of your or another government you look up to. But, on your own and to yourself, at least reflect about this when you can, and understand that you have to look at things fairly and be able to get yourself to support what is right, instead of people over and over again praising wrongdoings of many governments or people in general. And trying to present a case that so and so is on the right path or so and so nation bloc's are those who support Islam and the truth and what not.

Just think about that, if you guys want change, a lot of this distress we are causing for ourselves is unnecessary but because we are stubborn and biased, we enable it further. Nothing will change it unless we change ourselves. And yes that means beginning to adopt fair and right positions or opinions on matters and stating them publicly. That is the least we can do. And I suspect you will respond with a post reminding me that things aren't so bleak and that yeah reform will take time and what not, no need for that my friend. I just believe you are able to recognize wrongdoing just by reading or observing something. You just have some insecurities(which all of us have, not personal life ones, I mean political ones) of opening up and admitting some things are wrong from both sides as the predators will take advantage of this and use it against you. That being one of the reasons. But, I believe you can reach a point where personally and to yourself you can recognize what is right or wrong and there is no need to go out of your way to mention that if it causes you more trouble than you can handle. Some others I have no faith in as they are stubborn and insist they are rightly guided even when they're clearly wrong. Being right is not a matter of perspective, it's a clear truth. We have turned it into a perspective and this allows people to not turn back on what they insist.

Now you can imagine if people on this forum at least would try to speak out on what is right and wrong, there would be majority consensus that would inspire others to change, that would eventually force wrongdoers into the corner and at that point they would need to reform. But, I honestly don't believe all the current administrations can clean their record/image. I don't trust them 110% for anything, we need to work from a new start, literally. All of you are naive if you believe change can come from within those governments...and then those who believe Iranian gov't or other gov't(every single one) in region are rightly guided or suitable to lead lives of millions of peoples, I don't even know what to call them ....

Of course every media in this region is not fully independent and each has their own bias and at times agenda.

However I do believe that Al-Jazeera has taken it to another level of late. It is simply unacceptable for one of the most watched channels in the Arab world to air supposed clerics that are in support of what I wrote previously. Not every person is a rational person. Media has a big responsibility in shaping the views of the average person.

Look I admit openly (I have done so before) that the system of KSA gave time/allowed/did not enough to counter radical elements (again this is personal opinion what is considered a radical, there is no consensus about, this is not only about Daesh here) but steps have been taking to correct this even since King Salman became king and even before that. Qatar (as I see it) is still in denial.

What annoys me is that KSA has never claimed to be some sort of utopian Islamic republic or even a democracy. Or a country/entity that supports every movement against status quo in the region. What annoyed me once (not to such a extent because I fought that Qatar would grow out of it and side with their blood at all times in issues of mutual concern) and annoys me even more today is Qatar pretending (using Al-Jazeera) to be some kind of Islamic Republican utopia when it is arguably even more repressing than KSA. I know that money is king but it annoys me that supposed "progressive" or at least groups claiming to want change, are never singling out Qatar for the same vices that they label at KSA, Egypt and many if not most Arab countries.

When the same media Al-Jazeera uses religion as a propaganda tool (I will never forget that lies that they wrote about KSA not allowing Qatari pilgrims entrance, harassing Qatari pilgrims, everything proved to be a lie and a few Qatari pilgrims even spoke against such lies publicly but their opinion was not aired) a limit is reached. Or when Qatar welcomes every wanted/opponent from the Arab world and gives them citizenship and hosts them while removing citizenship from local tribes/clans who are not in favor of Qatari policies.

What is Qatar's policy and goals? Why do they need regional countries to protect them or built military bases when we all know what those countries agenda is? Nothing less than trying to gain influence in the Arab heartlands. If any Arab country did similarly (if there were 22 Iranian countries or 22 Turkic countries) most people in those countries would be calling them traitors and wondering what they are up to. Even more so when they host the largest US base in the region.

I never thought that I would experience such strange behavior by Qatar regardless of the regimes in power having different views on Egypt and the MB by large.

This forum is not for serious in-depth discussions, sadly. Most people do not read your or my posts if they contain more than 20 sentences. People don't bother. You can read my discussion with 1-2 users in this thread. Half of what I am replying to, I never wrote.

However when you have so many people writing outright nonsense about KSA and Arabs, obviously you are forced to take a stance in favor and sometimes this includes "being blind to the ills" but that is only publicly but even that I would claim is wrong in my guess as I have criticized KSA' politics many times sometimes that I have not seen often among Iranian users here for instance. This might have something to do with them living in Iran and such behavior risking being punished by the regime in power.

We can agree or disagree with certain political questions/topic/conflicts but what we should never do is stand with foreigners over our own and sadly due to the many Arab countries, various political views and ideologies at play, I have noticed that too many Arabs (for my liking) are willing to side with country x or y or government x or y just because they agree with their politics on topic x or y rather than their own flesh and blood despite disagreeing with them on a few topics but overall having much closer views than with others.

Makruh still means it's permissible.

Yes, I agree, we shouldn't feel the need to please others who won't be pleased no matter what and quite frankly, couldn't care less.

This has nothing to do with pleasing. This cleric in question has likely no need for that nor is this his agenda. I doubt that he expects his comment to reach any Western media nor do I think (personally) that he has ever met with scholars of other religions.

I don't know how you can interpret this statement like that.

You do know that he is just quoting an Islamic tradition and viewpoint that he did not invent but which was followed/known already almost 1400 years ago?

I don't buy this logic and we are back to what I stated in this thread. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. I honestly don't know any country in this region that is this scrutinized as KSA. The double standards are annoying, quite frankly. I am sure that I could find similar comments by clerics from other countries and no big deal would be made out of this.

EDIT; I wrote this comment very quickly and I don't bother correcting the grammatical mistakes or insufficient sentences. I don't bother right now, I have a slight fewer and it is late here.
 
.
@Saif al-Arab

Just to clarify, I wasn't addressing topic in OP. I am addressing the usual flaws I see in Muslim people. So that's why I don't prefer talking about Iran or Qatar or KSA specifically. I'm not really nationalistically orientated, I don't look at things like normal people do. I don't have attachment to nationalism, but I also don't have attachment to modern day Islamism. I'm an odd blend, into Islam and also into humanism, etc.... So it's frustrating for people to misunderstand and think I'm referring to a country. So to get to Qatar, I don't want to discuss Qatar's specific agenda or what not. I will make a quick point about their influence in public sphere, they probably got large audience and stuck with it. And they are not sure where to take it, but they don't escape certain realities in region and report on them. Which is why they're more popular than other channels. That being said , let's forget what their agenda and lets acknowledge every country has a project/agenda of their own. My point is I feel all these agendas are greedy, full of wrongdoing and I feel no attachment to them at all. I just don't know what the alternative would be. You can't strip everything down and start from scratch. You also can't please people with an alternative unless there is a change in their character. The peoples current overall average characters are what enable these agenda's/projects to continue with success and these agenda's are first of all contrary to what Islam is about(if that is a concern), but it that is not a concern, these agenda's are also wrong if you or anyone else consider themselves a good person that has sense of justice/fairness/empathy/etc....

A dream of mine would be for people to lose attachment to these agenda's and instead able to empathize with others and instead not be so greedy and start spreading justice in the region. Whether that means help the poor, or oppose the corrupt, or stop oppression, or address wealth disparities, or address some human behaviors in the social scene that aren't right, or whatever else is the right thing to do. It would solve many social and political issues facing us. And I don't just mean poverty or conflict. I get really deep about this, and even simple things such as people being rude to others, or people judging peoples appearances, or people spreading false rumors about others, etc.... You get the point. I feel like that's what God wants from us and that was how the society was at the times of Prophet's.

Now today many people are uncertain of God, even without recognizing that insecurity. That is totally under stable in our time, what that leads to is people being insecure about change and want to stick to what we see as a stable reality and continued development and goals. And with that they of course believe any other alternative will harm development or is against development, etc.... Life has kind of revolved around development, security and prosperity. That's not healthy and people don't want to discuss that because the consequences won't be seen in our immediate future. So those future generations can deal with it....

So I personally ignore nationalism or political alliances nowadays, they do nothing for me. But , I know there are great people in every country and I feel like they are lacking the tools or opportunities or motivation to realize this dream, yet at the same time it's realizable. We are not going to move out of our comfort zone until we are forced to. So I am absolutely a realistic person and not trying to spark change on a forum, I just want people to remind people we can have a better world and people need to also fear God and tone down the biases and don't support and enable wrongdoing. It is not that difficult. And the rest of the affairs are in God's hand's', he's enabled this life and this Universe and he's mysterious so we don't know how this change will come about, but I believe it will in our lifetime. It's long overdue.
 
.
Of course every media in this region is not fully independent and each has their own bias and at times agenda.

However I do believe that Al-Jazeera has taken it to another level of late. It is simply unacceptable for one of the most watched channels in the Arab world to air supposed clerics that are in support of what I wrote previously. Not every person is a rational person. Media has a big responsibility in shaping the views of the average person.

Look I admit openly (I have done so before) that the system of KSA gave time/allowed/did not enough to counter radical elements (again this is personal opinion what is considered a radical, there is no consensus about, this is not only about Daesh here) but steps have been taking to correct this even since King Salman became king and even before that. Qatar (as I see it) is still in denial.

What annoys me is that KSA has never claimed to be some sort of utopian Islamic republic or even a democracy. Or a country/entity that supports every movement against status quo in the region. What annoyed me once (not to such a extent because I fought that Qatar would grow out of it and side with their blood at all times in issues of mutual concern) and annoys me even more today is Qatar pretending (using Al-Jazeera) to be some kind of Islamic Republican utopia when it is arguably even more repressing than KSA. I know that money is king but it annoys me that supposed "progressive" or at least groups claiming to want change, are never singling out Qatar for the same vices that they label at KSA, Egypt and many if not most Arab countries.

When the same media Al-Jazeera uses religion as a propaganda tool (I will never forget that lies that they wrote about KSA not allowing Qatari pilgrims entrance, harassing Qatari pilgrims, everything proved to be a lie and a few Qatari pilgrims even spoke against such lies publicly but their opinion was not aired) a limit is reached. Or when Qatar welcomes every wanted/opponent from the Arab world and gives them citizenship and hosts them while removing citizenship from local tribes/clans who are not in favor of Qatari policies.

What is Qatar's policy and goals? Why do they need regional countries to protect them or built military bases when we all know what those countries agenda is? Nothing less than trying to gain influence in the Arab heartlands. If any Arab country did similarly (if there were 22 Iranian countries or 22 Turkic countries) most people in those countries would be calling them traitors and wondering what they are up to. Even more so when they host the largest US base in the region.

I never thought that I would experience such strange behavior by Qatar regardless of the regimes in power having different views on Egypt and the MB by large.

This forum is not for serious in-depth discussions, sadly. Most people do not read your or my posts if they contain more than 20 sentences. People don't bother. You can read my discussion with 1-2 users in this thread. Half of what I am replying to, I never wrote.

However when you have so many people writing outright nonsense about KSA and Arabs, obviously you are forced to take a stance in favor and sometimes this includes "being blind to the ills" but that is only publicly but even that I would claim is wrong in my guess as I have criticized KSA' politics many times sometimes that I have not seen often among Iranian users here for instance. This might have something to do with them living in Iran and such behavior risking being punished by the regime in power.

We can agree or disagree with certain political questions/topic/conflicts but what we should never do is stand with foreigners over our own and sadly due to the many Arab countries, various political views and ideologies at play, I have noticed that too many Arabs (for my liking) are willing to side with country x or y or government x or y just because they agree with their politics on topic x or y rather than their own flesh and blood despite disagreeing with them on a few topics but overall having much closer views than with others.



This has nothing to do with pleasing. This cleric in question has likely no need for that nor is this his agenda. I doubt that he expects his comment to reach any Western media nor do I think (personally) that he has ever met with scholars of other religions.

I don't know how you can interpret this statement like that.

You do know that he is just quoting an Islamic tradition and viewpoint that he did not invent but which was followed/known already almost 1400 years ago?

I don't buy this logic and we are back to what I stated in this thread. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. I honestly don't know any country in this region that is this scrutinized as KSA. The double standards are annoying, quite frankly. I am sure that I could find similar comments by clerics from other countries and no big deal would be made out of this.

EDIT; I wrote this comment very quickly and I don't bother correcting the grammatical mistakes or insufficient sentences. I don't bother right now, I have a slight fewer and it is late here.

I'm not criticising this guy at all, I was speaking broadly when I mentioned not trying to appease others. This fatwa of his isn't really ground breaking, it's just repeating what (I thought) is common knowledge.
 
.
Looks like you are a scholar of the Roman Catholic Church, but when it comes to Islam in the West, you are not so knowledgeable.

You know that it is against the law to build a mosque with a minaret in Switzerland, right? You know that mosques in the US face considerable difficulties when it comes to construction, right?

Zoning laws are used to prevent Muslims from using the land. If the land can be zoned, then access to water, electricity, sewerage may be denied. City councils have heated meeting about not having a mosque in "my backyard." Laws against Shariah laws are routinely passed at the state legislature level. When the mosque that is now 50 years old cannot accommodate all worshippers on a Friday, they start to pray on the street. Then laws are passed at the local level to prevent praying on the street.

You know all this don't you, BHarwana?

So when Muslims in the West are faced with these issues, they look for alternatives. The easy alternative is to buy a church. It is already built, zoned, non-profit, non-residential, non-business entity with water, electricity, and sewerage all provided. It even has a large parking lot. And it is not being used. The Church is happy to sell the building in the city where Muslims are, and move to some small community where people still go to church every Sunday.

Muslims buy these properties and convert them to a mosque. The fatwa simply legitimizes this issue so that people like you don't raise a stink.

Get it, now?

When you visit the US, I would be happy to take you to a local "church" on Friday.

Sir with due respect buying a church and converting it into a mosque there is nothing wrong with it. I am talking about praying in a church that is where the discussion started and if Saudi Gov is so concerned about Islam it should sanction USA or Switzerland for their anti Islam policies and as a result all Muslim nations will follow. If Saudis can turn all Muslims nations against Qatar which is a Muslim nation surely they can do that to USA or Switzerland and this step will be welcomed by Islamic world but will Saudis do that no never they will not do that so who is to blame here. West can fall on their knees in a day of oil blockade from Opec and come to terms with Islamic world but my friend we all know what is going on here. Do you get me now?
Don't tell me what you have done as a charity but have you done what was needed of you? lesser evil is not acceptable but there should be no evil.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom