What's new

Top leaders of five countries to join Bangladesh’s 50 years celebrations

.
you are like empty vessels making noise. You have nothing to show.

i do have something to show. but i would be a moron if i didnt learn your game and adapt to it. you are the king of bullshit and shifting goalposts. you are only interested in a neutral source if it agrees with india. so there is no point in showing you jackshit.
 
.
i do have something to show. but i would be a moron if i didnt learn your game and adapt to it. you are the king of bullshit and shifting goalposts. you are only interested in a neutral source if it agrees with india. so there is no point in showing you jackshit.
If you had something, you would have shown by now and shouted from the rooftop. You have nothing credible to show, accept it. Dont derail the topic now. Open another thread on this if you have anything. I wont reply any further on this issue on this thread.
 
.
If you had something, you would have shown by now and shouted from the rooftop.

no, i have changed. i know your game

You have nothing credible to show

i do have something credible.

Dont derail the topic now.

you are the one that wont answer a simple question. what is the point of a neutral source when you never accept it if it goes against india's narrative?

I wont reply any further on this issue on this thread.

cool. piss off.
 
.
We don't have a border with China. Don't know if that is a good thing or bad thing.
Anyway , do you remember in 2015 when China did not give flow data Brahmaputra (during monsoon) to India but gave it to us ? They had to go crying to the chinese to release the flow data. Your comment reminded me of this incident.
What if i told you that the chinese want to remove india from india northeast and share the region with BD. South tibet goes with china. The rest go with BD.

Win win for both countries
 
.
Can't really fault wikipedia these days, even Universities have nothing to say about them anymore lol.

If you wanted to edit Trump's profile, there is a content lock to avoid the spill of politics into the bio. Only certain privileged editors, not fan boys.
 
.
We all know you surrendered and submitted meekly to Chinese. No point sugar coating it as exchange to us.

Yes, Pakistan got more land, but it was a meek surrender. Pajeet logic strikes again!

We beat them too.

No you didn't, that's why you were the ones who lost land LMAO. That's why there were Ladakh MPs crying about how your government sacrificed dozens of viraat Hanuman Pajeets Indians, only to lose a chunk of land.

Ofcourse being a communication controlled regime, true figures will never come out from their side.

LOL so if I can get this straight here, you have no proof that more Chinese died, nor do you have any proof that China didn't give Pakistan more land. It looks like your opinions are entirely formulated on feelings. Literally delusional. No wonder you people believe in ancient flying spaceships.

first provide a neutral source if you have before blabbering needlessly.

Prove the source wrong first. No, Whatsapp forwards from your Yogi don't count.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Yes, Pakistan got more land, but it was a meek surrender. Pajeet logic strikes again!

No you didn't, that's why you were the ones who lost land LMAO. That's why there were Ladakh MPs crying about how your government sacrificed dozens of viraat Hanuman Pajeets, only to lose a chunk of land.

LOL so if I can get this straight here, you have no proof that more Chinese died, nor do you have any proof that China didn't give Pakistan more land. It looks like your opinions are entirely formulated on feelings. Literally delusional. No wonder you people believe in ancient flying spaceships.

Prove the source wrong first. No, Whatsapp forwards from your Yogi don't count.
I am willing to debate on each of the above points if I get an assurance of a civilized conversation from you.
Using abusive language or using words like 'Pajeet' wont do. I dont want to be saying Porkistani or jihadi everytime I refer to you.
 
. . . .
Hahaha jali naa :rofl:
076636D3-FE11-4E3E-8A16-34F3E7C356B7.png
 
.
No you're not. Someone linked you a source disputing your nonsensical pajeet claims two pages ago and you spent the entire repeating the same canned line about its neutrality like an NPC. You're a slimy, dishonest pajeet who couldn't debate honestly before and probably isn't interested in it right now either. Don't like me calling you pajeet? Suck it up, it's a common name in the slums you came from.
Thanks for being honest that you are incapable of a civilized conversation. My list of 'ignored' increases.
 
. .
Could have posted the shameful picture of 70,000 soldiers pathetically surrendering but couldn’t scoop to the level of my amateur neighbors.
Irony is you post a picture of a guy who downed an F16 with his substandard jet. Hail Pakistani logic and IQ!
Please do post that picture after all not a single Bengali in it xD
I should be posting pics of Indian tanks that were stopped on roads to lahore by east Bengal regiment
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom