What's new

Top 10 Future Weapons of Pakistan [Updated]

Nuke Sub is definitely needed... You really wan't Pakistan to be without an effective second strike capability? Pakistan to Poor to get the important stuff.

Nuclear Air craft carrier probably not in our life time... you need a GDP of $10,000+ per capita to even think about that...... Plus its not needed.... We need 4-5 Nuclear ballistic Submarines 12-16 Mirv capable Missiles per sub.... Holding our Thermonuclear arsenal....
You dont need a Nuke sub for second strike capabilities. The upcoming subs including the 90Bs will be more than capable of that role
A
 
.
You dont need a Nuke sub for second strike capabilities. The upcoming subs including the 90Bs will be more than capable of that role
A
The upcoming subs don't have nuclear reactor.... neither the capacity to hold submarine launched ballistic missiles...... Other weapons are not as effective as these.... And Nuke SSBN should be a priority....
 
.
Nuke Sub is definitely needed... You really wan't Pakistan to be without an effective second strike capability? Pakistan to Poor to get the important stuff.

Nuclear Air craft carrier probably not in our life time... you need a GDP of $10,000+ per capita to even think about that...... Plus its not needed.... We need 4-5 Nuclear ballistic Submarines 12-16 Mirv capable Missiles per sub.... Holding our Thermonuclear arsenal....
You dont need a Nuke sub for second strike capabilities. The upcoming subs including the 90Bs will be more than capable of that role
A
The upcoming subs don't have nuclear reactor.... neither the capacity to hold submarine launched ballistic missiles...... Other weapons are not as effective as these.... And Nuke SSBN should be a priority....
Please read my post again. The current nuke tipped missiles can be fired from 90Bs. Let us see what tye new Chinese subs will have but suffice it to say what we have can be fired from a sub.
A
 
.
You dont need a Nuke sub for second strike capabilities. The upcoming subs including the 90Bs will be more than capable of that role
A
If you need Assured Second Strike capability then combination of SSBN and SLBM is critical. Combo of SSK and nuclear tipped SLCM is more like a stop gap or 'desperate attempt' to full fill a crucial requirement for time being.
Pakistan's concept of sea borne second strike capability lack some very important elements of assured retaliation. i.e lack of endurance of launch platform, questionable survivability of launch platform, very limited range, limited strike prowess and complexities involving Command and Control of onboard nuclear weapons.
Pakistan in mid future terms, will ultimately follow the same route as followed by Indian navy as per now.
 
.
What Pakistan actually needs:

1. MRAP
mrap.jpg


2. 155mm artillery
g5-LIWAR05.jpg


3. Medium to Hi Alt Air Defence
s400.jpg
 
.
If you need Assured Second Strike capability then combination of SSBN and SLBM is critical. Combo of SSK and nuclear tipped SLCM is more like a stop gap or 'desperate attempt' to full fill a crucial requirement for time being.
Pakistan's concept of sea borne second strike capability lack some very important elements of assured retaliation. i.e lack of endurance of launch platform, questionable survivability of launch platform, very limited range, limited strike prowess and complexities involving Command and Control of onboard nuclear weapons.
Pakistan in mid future terms, will ultimately follow the same route as followed by Indian navy as per now.

Believe me stop wasting money on that, there wouldn't be anything left in Pakistan for retaliation.
 
.
Believe me stop wasting money on that, there wouldn't be anything left in Pakistan for retaliation.
Non sense.
Indian lack ability to neutralize Pakistan nuclear forces completely. Even if India compromise its commitments related to No First Use and conduct counter force nuclear strike, it still cannot neutralize Pakistan land based nuclear forces. Strategic assets of Air Force and Navy come way later.
 
. . . .
A sting tactical airforce based on blitz kreig not Months long wars, then air defence,
AF is there with JF-17 and F-16 supported by Mirages, adequate for the job. The aircraft are there, a high altitude SAM and ABM capability is missing.
The other gimmicks like 155 should come after these
LOC is an ongoing unpredictable conflict. 122mm needs replacement, lacks range, old technology. 130mm isn't howitzer. 155mm is also required on western border.
Also mraps priority for the West
In dire need of MRAP's.
 
. . .
You dont need a Nuke sub for second strike capabilities. The upcoming subs including the 90Bs will be more than capable of that role
A
A Nuke sub can be classified as one that carries a nuclear payload, it does not require it to be nuclear powered. However a country possessing nuclear reactor small enough to power a submarine indicates her advancements in this field.

The basic advantage a nuclear powered Sub or any other naval surface vessel would give unlimited life and range due to unlimited supply of fuel. The limitations are food, water and health.

Please read my post again. The current nuke tipped missiles can be fired from 90Bs. Let us see what tye new Chinese subs will have but suffice it to say what we have can be fired from a sub.
A
This is still not officially confirmed.
However this is very likely possible as the Israeli Navy has officially disclosed that they have this capability.

Believe me stop wasting money on that, there wouldn't be anything left in Pakistan for retaliation.
Don't worry Pakistani's will still survive...
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom