Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course you would disagree. Who in their right (or in your case 'wrong') mind would agree when he is being told he is wrong? You use the phrase 'continuous curvature' without a clue of what it mean and how it works. Heck, you learned that phrase and just about everything else about this subject from me. I will explain how you are wrong and will post my explanation in the appropriate sub-forum and will reference it here. When people read my explanation, you will be finally the laughing stock of the Internet.We disagree.
I will now claim to be the first person on the internet to explicitly state that the J-20's shaped nose above the chine/ridge line follows the "continuous curvature" principle of stealth design. Also, I am stating the shaped nose below the chine/ridge line follows the facet principle.
Of course you would disagree. Who in their right (or in your case 'wrong') mind would agree when he is being told he is wrong? You use the phrase 'continuous curvature' without a clue of what it mean and how it works. Heck, you learned that phrase and just about everything else about this subject from me. I will explain how you are wrong and will post my explanation in the appropriate sub-forum and will reference it here. When people read my explanation, you will be finally the laughing stock of the Internet.
By the way, I reconsidered and instead of an 'F' I will give you an 'E' for effort so far.
I challenge you to show everyone where I said that the J-20 could not fly based upon my suspicion. If anything, this post showed very clear to me that what I said about 'Byzantine failures' went whoooooossssshhhh over your head.I only recall Gambit saying, "we don't really know anything unless we can physically examine a J-20 Mighty Dragon ourselves." I've been saying that he's nuts and I've kept analyzing and comparing the J-20, F-22, F-35, and T-50.
Wait a second, I remember Gambit making a b.s. claim that the J-20 probably had a software problem and couldn't fly based on a single picture of asymmetric vertical stabilizers. I said he was full of it and cited China's experience with fly-by-wire from the J-10 program. He insisted the J-20 couldn't fly and I remember it flew within a few days. Gambit's observation/prediction was dead wrong.
Does not matter if you read it or not. Others will and in their objective minds, you will be that laughing stock. They will see my explanation as logical and technically valid based upon certain principles I posted here before.We disagree again. I believe "E" is for excellent analysis.
I hope you know I won't read your convoluted and silly explanation. I like to spend my time productively. For the same reason, I am ignoring a silly person's thread about me.
I challenge you to show everyone where I said that the J-20 could not fly based upon my suspicion. If anything, this post showed very clear to me that what I said about 'Byzantine failures' went whoooooossssshhhh over your head.
---------- Post added at 08:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:35 PM ----------
Does not matter if you read it or not. Others will and in their objective minds, you will be that laughing stock. They will see my explanation as logical and technically valid based upon certain principles I posted here before.
Nowhere did I ever said the J-20 could not fly based upon 'Byzantine failures'. Am willing to bet that it is here and from me that you have learned there is such an obscure and esoteric thing. But it is something very important for process engineering. So for me to say that the J-20 could not fly because of 'Byzantine failures' would be technically incorrect. You took the word 'failures' out of its proper context in this subject.You know the old J-20 thread with over 300,000 views was deleted. Even if I was willing to spend an hour looking for your erroneous post, it is no longer available. You know that.
You know the old J-20 thread with over 300,000 views was deleted. Even if I was willing to spend an hour (which you know I'm not willing to do) looking for your erroneous post, it is no longer available. You know that.
Gaps, seams, protrusions, surface discontinuities, sudden changes in shape everywhere.
How is the PAK FA even stealthy?
Here's a real stealth fighter.
That is because I am not you. I have relevant experience in the subject. I know the pitfalls of making assumptions without caveats. And when I do make an assertion, I back it up with credible third party sources and/or sources that demonstrate basic principles that are universal. In other words, unlike you, I provide the readers with information that they can use to apply against everyone. In that, I am more fair than you can ever be.I don't recall Gambit making a single important unique observation.
We pretty much did it with Iraq. Fine...How about two blinks?Gambit has a usual habit of denial.
Dealing with the deleted thread, he has done the same in case where i caught him making the outrageous claim such as the US will wipe out China's air force in a blink of eye.
Gambit has a usual habit of denial.
Dealing with the deleted thread, he has done the same in case where i caught him making the outrageous claim such as the US will wipe out China's air force in a blink of eye.
We disagree again. I believe "E" is for excellent analysis.
I hope you know I won't read your convoluted and silly explanation. I like to spend my time productively. For the same reason, I am ignoring a silly person's thread about me.
You will be seriously spanked about that. And I will use a Popular Science article from forty years ago and the Space Shuttle of today to do it.I proved him wrong in his assertion that a ballistic missile warhead only falls vertically onto its target. He mumbled something about "vertical" not being "vertical" and that I misunderstood him. I've given up hope that he will muster the courage to ever admit a mistake. I've made my share of mistakes, but I admit to them.
Anyway, Gambit is Gambit. <shrug>
Gaps, seams, protrusions, surface discontinuities, sudden changes in shape everywhere.
How is the PAK FA even stealthy?
Here's a real stealth fighter.