Contrarian
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Messages
- 11,571
- Reaction score
- 4
That is what i am trying to say mate. He is NOT credible.I must say I have never heard such a negative description of Sengupta from anyone before, nor can I comment on your accusation of 'lying' without any more information.
I do know that he has been a largely credible writer on defence related issues for many years now, and his information matches up with other sources.
You might find his article credible. And i will not contest that, whether the article is credible or not, i donot claim to know any better. But i have myself seen some factual errors and have also seen him being pulled up by others who have also found factual errors in his articles.For his information here to be wrong you would have to claim that an obvious nationalist decided to make up conversations with Indian generals and make it conform to what Musharraf said, even though it paints his country in a negative light.
That's really stretching it.
But, we can agree to disagree. I find his article very credible given the reasons I have already mentioned.
Like Bull says, its not about opinions he is pulled for, its about what he portrays as facts. He has been known to print inaccuracies and speculation as FACTS. What is so hard to understand there mate? I reiterate that i am not talking about his opinions, opinions over which i too have seen character assassinations of many people,i am talking about facts.
He is NOT one of the credible defence analysts or writers in India. There is only one publication where he is featured regularly-a magazine called 'Force'-of which he is the Chief Editor.