To China's Latest Warning On Border Row, India Sticks To Diplomacy

[ashok321]

Source>>


NEW DELHI: In line with Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj's stress on patience, restraint and diplomacy to resolve the Dokalam standoff, India on Friday refused to be drawn into a tit-for-tat with Beijing, saying New Delhi wanted peace and tranquillity at the border and would achieve this objective through diplomacy.

Foreign ministry spokesperson Gopal Baglay's response comes hours after the Chinese defence ministry delivered another warning. A spokesperson for the defence ministry had insisted that Beijing had "shown utmost goodwill and a high level of restraint with an eye to the general bilateral relations and the regional peace and stability."


"However, goodwill has its principles and restraint has its bottom line," the defence ministry said, upping the ante.

"We continue to engage with China through diplomatic channels to find a mutually acceptable solution," Mr Baglay said, reiterating Sushma Swaraj's statement in parliament yesterday that war is not an answer.


He said has been coordinating with Bhutan to find a mutually-acceptable solution to the Dokalam standoff India and continues to engage with China diplomatically according to Astana consensus, a reference to the broad agreement between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in the Kazakhstan capital that they must not let differences become a dispute.


The standoff began on June 16 after Chinese troops began constructing a road near the trijunction with Bhutan, which India says was a unilateral action by Beijing to change the status quo in the area.


New Delhi fears the construction of the road would allow China to cut off India's access to its northeastern states. Ren Guoqiang, a spokesperson of the Chinese defence ministry, in a statement called on the Indian side to swiftly address the situation in a proper manner to restore peace and tranquillity in the border region.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

China simply not negotiate and no talk and Indian foreign minister is expecting a diplomatic solution?

 

[shjliu]

According to Chinese external affair, they did inform India about road construction on the May 18 and June 8, but no reply from India.

 

[ashok321]

Doklam standoff: Has India proved it can't stand up to China's psywar?

http://www.dailyo.in/politics/psywar-china-doklam-xi-jinping-narendra-modi/story/1/18631.html

 

[ashok321]

Engaging with China diplomatically to find a solution: India on Doklam standoff

So Modi climbing down from his high horse?

 

[NALANDA]

---------------------------------------------------
1. China has agreed to destroy 100 meters of the road it was building beyond the ''Turning Point''.
2. In return, India has agreed to withdraw its troops but will monitor the Chinese from above - sitting on the ridge 300 meters to the east of the standoff site.
3. India will coordinate with Bhutan to replace Indian soldiers with 300 Bhutanese soldiers.
Mere pyare Chini Neta, Agar thook nahi chaatna tha toh thookey kyon ?
Agali baar yaad rakhna
Intrusion in India = Protrusion from behind for China.

 

[Place Of Space]

I think Modi had lost the control of Indian army before this standoff.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Doklam standoff: Has India proved it can't stand up to China's psywar?

http://www.dailyo.in/politics/psywar-china-doklam-xi-jinping-narendra-modi/story/1/18631.html

Brahma Chellaney, so call Indian strategist is nothing but a joke. This man cried all day long about China's water policy and India will be get harm severly, the only thing what he said it's truth is that water will be more precious as commodity than oil and gas the future, I hope he will live long a enough to see how we will divert Tibet water and dehydrated India.

---------------------------------------------------
1. China has agreed to destroy 100 meters of the road it was building beyond the ''Turning Point''.
2. In return, India has agreed to withdraw its troops but will monitor the Chinese from above - sitting on the ridge 300 meters to the east of the standoff site.
3. India will coordinate with Bhutan to replace Indian soldiers with 300 Bhutanese soldiers.
Mere pyare Chini Neta, Agar thook nahi chaatna tha toh thookey kyon ?
Agali baar yaad rakhna
Intrusion in India = Protrusion from behind for China.

lol keep pasting over and over these useless craps, I though India has already completely bulldozed our road

Engaging with China diplomatically to find a solution: India on Doklam standoff

So Modi climbing down from his high horse?

View attachment 416089

Maybe after getting some much warning, Indians foreign minster and Modi start to feel China pressure and couldn't stand up the heat.

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

---------------------------------------------------
1. China has agreed to destroy 100 meters of the road it was building beyond the ''Turning Point''.
2. In return, India has agreed to withdraw its troops but will monitor the Chinese from above - sitting on the ridge 300 meters to the east of the standoff site.
3. India will coordinate with Bhutan to replace Indian soldiers with 300 Bhutanese soldiers.
Mere pyare Chini Neta, Agar thook nahi chaatna tha toh thookey kyon ?
Agali baar yaad rakhna
Intrusion in India = Protrusion from behind for China.

From. Where you got this ?

 

[NALANDA]

From. Where you got this


This is all over now. China will continue to huff and puff for its CCCP members but no action on the ground will be taken. China and India will wait for September to arrive post which China will destroy the roads it has already built there and which was not completely destroyed by ITBP / Indian Army. China will pull back. Bhutanese Army will send in their guys totalling 300 and Indian Army will keep a watch from nearby ridges.

Now ....some guys in China will be on the firing line for overestimating....China will try to forget the episode ..just like 1967 and 1986 incidence.

India will keep quiet ( need to give face saver to China).

Only the Pakistani and Chinese posters on PDF will be the dejected lot but will invent some macho story as usual.

 

[Han Patriot]

From. Where you got this ?

Asked about China’s claim of India reducing its troops from 400 to 40 in Doklam, he said refused to give a direct reply calling it an operational matter.

http://southasianmonitor.com/2017/08/05/coordinating-bhutan-doklam-issue-india/

xxx

 

[The Indian Hawk]

The weapon that can turn the fate of the battle.
Kali: Everything About The Secret Beam Weapon Of India

 

[shahbaz baig]

The weapon that can turn the fate of the battle.
Kali: Everything About The Secret Beam Weapon Of India

Another delusional indian spotted. Just tell me what are you waiting for ?

 

[The Indian Hawk]

Another delusional indian spotted. Just tell me what are you waiting for ?

Please go through the post. And understand it's capabilities. This is not something to start a war with.

Defence Ministry approves purchase of 33 new fighter jets including 21 MiG-29s from Russia

The Defence Ministry on Thursday approved a proposal to acquire 33 new fighter aircraft including 12 Su-30MKIs and 21 MiG-29s along with upgradation of 59 MiG-29s at a cost of Rs 18,148 crore.

 

[dbc]

Please go through the post. And understand it's capabilities. This is not something to start a war with.

Defence Ministry approves purchase of 33 new fighter jets including 21 MiG-29s from Russia

The Defence Ministry on Thursday approved a proposal to acquire 33 new fighter aircraft including 12 Su-30MKIs and 21 MiG-29s along with upgradation of 59 MiG-29s at a cost of Rs 18,148 crore.

I wonder if history will repeat itself.

From the CIA Archives.

In the late 1950s and early 1960s, while India’s relations with China were going from bad to worse and the Sino-Soviet ideological dispute was intensifying, Indo-Soviet relations were growing more cordial. Nehru’s official position did not change. He maintained that India's security was best protected by its role as a buffer between superpowers, and he opposed formal alignments or military pacts. Nevertheless, the Indians leaned more heavily on the Soviet Union as their border problems with the Chinese increased. Many Indians managed to convince themselves that, in the event of real trouble with the Chinese, the Soviet Union would offer active support.
When the Sino-Indian border war erupted in 1962, Indian expectations were not fully realized. Although the Soviets continued to supply military and economic aid and let it be known that they would build a MIG aircraft factory in India, they did not give the kind of dramatic support New Delhi had hoped for. The Soviets avoided taking sides as long as possible (they were coping with the Cuban missile crisis at the time); then they issued a pro forma statement in favor of China. This statement, coupled with the rapid and humiliating defeat suffered by Indian forces, continuing Chinese hostility, and Pakistani-US friendship, led Nehru to declare that India must "have adequate armed strength.” Not wishing to be only a pawn in big power politics, Nehru’s government began to revamp national priorities so as to achieve effective military ».rd economic power as soon as possible -the ideal of self-reliance which his daughter Indira Gandhi would proclaim as Indian policy nine years later.
The achievement of self-sufficiency is a long process, and even as Nehru worked toward that goal, the nation was drawn into closer involvement with the Soviet Union. In February 1962, the Soviets shipped India four of an initial order of 12 MIG-21 fighters, and work began or a complex of MIG assembly plants in India. In September 1964, the Soviets confirmed their readiness to assist in the construction of the huge Bokaro steel plant and to boost further their stock with the Indian Government they continued to admonish the Indian Communist Party to follow- a peaceful, parliamentary path. Meanwhile, tension persisted along the Sino-Indian border, and India engaged Pakistan in a brief and inconclusive border fracas over a dispute in the Rann of Kutch-a remote area near the southern terminus of the Indo - West Pakistani border.

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85T00875R001100130127-2.pdf