What's new

To advance in self-driving, China depends on US technology

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
China has moved in recent months to allow autonomous car tests on city roads, and has said it hopes that smart cars will make up half of new cars on the road by 2020. That’s a goal that, for now, requires US and German technology.

Laser-radar sensor technology, or lidar, is what allows an autonomous car to “see” what’s around it, but Chinese domestic lidar manufacturers are still struggling to match US technology, according to Chinese newspaper Science Daily (link in Chinese) on Tuesday (May 9). As a result, many self-driving car companies need to import foreign lidars, and many of them rely on a single company: California-based Velodyne.

Baidu, China’s search giant, used Velodnye’s lidar to conduct a road test in China in early 2016, and is also an investor in the company. Pony.ai, a self-driving startup in the southern city of Guangzhou, is also using Velodyne’s lidar to test cars. Velodyne has previously said that 85% of participants in a 2015 autonomous vehicle competition in China were using its lidars.

Usually mounted on top of the car, the lidar continuously sends out laser beams. By measuring the time it takes the light to bounce back from nearby objects, it produces a 360-degree real-time map, which the car’s computer uses to make predictions and decisions. Compared to radar, lidar’s laser vision is better at capturing arms and legs, which makes it better at helping the car handle pedestrians. Every serious player in the self-driving race sees laser vision as an indispensable ingredient for a fully autonomous car, noted technology news blog Wired. (Elon Musk, though, has argued that lidar isn’t necessary, and is instead banking on cameras.)

China has long said it want to rely more on indigenous technology, and as tensions with the US over tech ratchet up, it’s putting more money into that. Right now China now only make lidars capable of emitting 40 laser beams—far from the 128 laser beams rolled out by Velodyne late last year. More beams require chips with higher processing power to better project and receive signals, and domestic lidar makers also often have to source these from overseas.

A company spokesperson for Chinese lidar maker RoboSense told Quartz that the Shenzhen-based firm turns for part of its chip supplies to Germany, as well as other countries. The company says it has been providing lidars emitting 16 to 32 laser beams to self-driving firms in China, but didn’t provide names.

The high cost of manufacturing top-end lidars, and the relatively long time it takes to test the technology to meet safety regulations, are another obstacle. They’re why top lidars are still pretty expensive, although Velodyne cut its 16-beam lidar, its most popular sensor, to $4,000 this year. Experts say prices need to be a tenth of that for widespread adoption of self-driving cars.

Still, figuring out how to mass produce a high-end tech product cheaply is a problem that China’s really good at cracking. And as China’s pushes local manufacture and sourcing, it might not be surprising to see lidar become less of a niche industry in the future—perhaps with a little bit more help from foreign firms.

https://qz.com/1274305/to-advance-in-self-driving-china-depends-on-us-technology/
 
.
China has moved in recent months to allow autonomous car tests on city roads, and has said it hopes that smart cars will make up half of new cars on the road by 2020. That’s a goal that, for now, requires US and German technology.

Laser-radar sensor technology, or lidar, is what allows an autonomous car to “see” what’s around it, but Chinese domestic lidar manufacturers are still struggling to match US technology, according to Chinese newspaper Science Daily (link in Chinese) on Tuesday (May 9). As a result, many self-driving car companies need to import foreign lidars, and many of them rely on a single company: California-based Velodyne.

Baidu, China’s search giant, used Velodnye’s lidar to conduct a road test in China in early 2016, and is also an investor in the company. Pony.ai, a self-driving startup in the southern city of Guangzhou, is also using Velodyne’s lidar to test cars. Velodyne has previously said that 85% of participants in a 2015 autonomous vehicle competition in China were using its lidars.

Usually mounted on top of the car, the lidar continuously sends out laser beams. By measuring the time it takes the light to bounce back from nearby objects, it produces a 360-degree real-time map, which the car’s computer uses to make predictions and decisions. Compared to radar, lidar’s laser vision is better at capturing arms and legs, which makes it better at helping the car handle pedestrians. Every serious player in the self-driving race sees laser vision as an indispensable ingredient for a fully autonomous car, noted technology news blog Wired. (Elon Musk, though, has argued that lidar isn’t necessary, and is instead banking on cameras.)

China has long said it want to rely more on indigenous technology, and as tensions with the US over tech ratchet up, it’s putting more money into that. Right now China now only make lidars capable of emitting 40 laser beams—far from the 128 laser beams rolled out by Velodyne late last year. More beams require chips with higher processing power to better project and receive signals, and domestic lidar makers also often have to source these from overseas.

A company spokesperson for Chinese lidar maker RoboSense told Quartz that the Shenzhen-based firm turns for part of its chip supplies to Germany, as well as other countries. The company says it has been providing lidars emitting 16 to 32 laser beams to self-driving firms in China, but didn’t provide names.

The high cost of manufacturing top-end lidars, and the relatively long time it takes to test the technology to meet safety regulations, are another obstacle. They’re why top lidars are still pretty expensive, although Velodyne cut its 16-beam lidar, its most popular sensor, to $4,000 this year. Experts say prices need to be a tenth of that for widespread adoption of self-driving cars.

Still, figuring out how to mass produce a high-end tech product cheaply is a problem that China’s really good at cracking. And as China’s pushes local manufacture and sourcing, it might not be surprising to see lidar become less of a niche industry in the future—perhaps with a little bit more help from foreign firms.

https://qz.com/1274305/to-advance-in-self-driving-china-depends-on-us-technology/
qz website is a biased mis reporting western source. Can you come up with better link?

I will not be surprised it will come up with report next time talking about China next fastest supercomputer still need imported core components from US. :lol:

You are just a sore loser. :enjoy:
 
.
qz website is a biased mis reporting western source. Can you come up with better link?

I will not be surprised it will come up with report next time talking about China next fastest supercomputer still need imported core components from US. :lol:

You are just a sore loser. :enjoy:

What was exactly misreported? You need to wakeup to reality pal.
 
. .
qz website is a biased mis reporting western source. Can you come up with better link?

I will not be surprised it will come up with report next time talking about China next fastest supercomputer still need imported core components from US. :lol:

You are just a sore loser. :enjoy:

Don't try to project here.

Do you have any problem with what the article itself noted?

It is a fact that Chinese lidar suppliers are multiple generations behind Velodyne. I can bet you don't even know who Chinese lidar suppliers are, so I'll tell you, they are primarily Hesai, and Robosense.

It is also a fact, that even these suppliers depend on foreign countries for a lot of parts.

It is also a fact that Chinese firms have to rely on Nvidia GPUs, and other foreign processors to train their algorithms.

To advance in green public transportation, USA totally depends on Chinese technology...

How? Tell me how does USA "depend" on Chinese tech for green public transportation.

The buses can be manufactured by many companies. The Li-ion batteries are again made by other firms, including Panasonic. In fact, they even have their own company- Proterra making buses there.

In fact the reverse can be said to be true. The whole Chinese automobile sector depends on foreigners to supply machinery, robots, semiconductors, etc.
 
. .
market for self-driving components is still up for grab by everyone. the industry is still at very early stage. the components that purchased by auto companies are just for testing, not necessary will end up in final products. self-driving still has long, long way to go.. nvidia is the king in self-driving chips, but not for long. a lot of new ai asic chip startups are popping everywhere now offering better power-performance than gpu based. the same in lidar market..

new startups and others that not traditionally in this market are very active in new lidar patents..
ukAIlqB.png
 
Last edited:
.
How? Tell me how does USA "depend" on Chinese tech for green public transportation.

The buses can be manufactured by many companies. The Li-ion batteries are again made by other firms, including Panasonic. In fact, they even have their own company- Proterra making buses there.

In fact the reverse can be said to be true. The whole Chinese automobile sector depends on foreigners to supply machinery, robots, semiconductors, etc.
Normally I don't want to reply such "world vs China" post typically raised about by indians who are beggars themselves who got nothing but pretending to be a royalty...
Since you jump up so eagerly, here I will type a few lines for you:
First you should know something about BYD, and think about why BYD become the world's domination for green public transportation solutions, because they make the most competitive products with their core technology to meet the requirement while other companies can not! Otherwise they will not be chosen, simple logic. This is the same case for Qualcomm, it is not because other companies can not develop chips (we do have Kirin chips and whole range of chips for military use, for our super computers and for our Beidou naviation, etc.), but more about competitiveness for commercial success.

And you said the "the reverse can be said to be true", well, this is definitely true for your slum country, but probably not true for China.
Check the Chinese companies like:
Siasun Robot & Automation Co Ltd
Estun Automation Co Ltd
Shanghai STEP Robotics Corporation
And Efort Intelligent Equipment Co Ltd; etc. etc...
To see if China can manufacture industrial robot...

About chips, I already have said above, its a result of market success...It is even easier to find alternatives for chips used in things other than mobile phones and computers...

And machinery... OMG, you slum country government has really done a great job in brainwashing... When it comes to machinery, it will be too much a humiliation to someone from a poor slum country... Do you think a country which is capable making machines sophisticated like this can not make some machinery for automobile production?

Last I will tell you, Trump knows China better than you, that's why he is desperately trying to curb China's growth in technology, because he knows well that China is the only country could potentially destroy America's dominance in a lot of high-tech field... But most probably he will end up in failure, and we will see the result in a decade...
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom