Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry, but the committment was to reduce, not eliminate, nor yield their status as leading nuclear powers.But I heard they still posses about 90% of world's nuclear arsenal.So theres still a long way to go.
We have. Repeatedly.Nuke it!
Already US territories, genius.When did we test nukes on their island? WTF?
Soon US will establish democracy and freedom their as a revenge.
Luckily we got both.Having the biggest nuclear arsenal does not necessarily mean you have the biggest dick.
...
Iran is a signatory of the non-proliferation treaty. In seeking to propagate the lie that the Powers did nothing to reduce their nuclear arsenals it can then try to justify using imported nuclear technologies to build nuclear weapons of its own. That's trash; signatory "haves" - the U.S., the Soviet Union/Russia, the U.K., and France - all sharply chopped their arsenals over the past forty years. (The remaining "have", China, didn't.) But a fib can run around the world three times before the truth reaches the starting-gate.
So you give the technology and put a no go sign on the recipient? Which recipient would waste money on getting the knowledge and make the area and everything but then dont develop it? Makes no sense who suggested this treaty with holes like cheese in cartoons? And the nuclear powers reduce crap...Since when does power not corrupt? Seriously which egghead wrote the treaty?I'm not sure you understand. The point of the international nuclear treaties was that the nuclear powers would transfer their technologies to non-nuclear powers on the condition that the recipients would refrain from developing nuclear weapons. In turn, the nuclear powers would work to reduce their nuclear arsenals.
Is it really a lie?Iran is a signatory of the non-proliferation treaty. In seeking to propagate the lie that the Powers did nothing to reduce their nuclear arsenals it can then try to justify using imported nuclear technologies to build nuclear weapons of its own.
We dont know how much they had to start with....reports can be fabricated and it wont be a surprise...so how can we compare something (fake reports) against something that dont make sense (more fake reports)?That's trash; signatory "haves" - the U.S., the Soviet Union/Russia, the U.K., and France - all sharply chopped their arsenals over the past forty years. (The remaining "have", China, didn't.) But a fib can run around the world three times before the truth reaches the starting-gate.
Better than being Hawks...eating mice
apparently @Talon is too
When pigs fly...Not as an insult but the truth...Good job, i'm in favor of unilateral nuclear disarmament.
Already US territories, genius.
Already US territories, genius.
I would like them to win just so that this guy can rub of his smirk!NEW YORK (AP) — The tiny Pacific nation of the Marshall Islands is taking on the United States and the world's eight other nuclear-armed nations with an unprecedented lawsuit demanding that they meet their obligations toward disarmament and accusing them of "flagrant violations" of international law.
The island group that was used for dozens of U.S. nuclear tests after World War II filed suit Thursday against each of the nine countries in the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands. It also filed a federal lawsuit against the United States in San Francisco, naming President Barack Obama, the departments and secretaries of defense and energy and the National Nuclear Security Administration.
The Marshall Islands claims the nine countries are modernizing their nuclear arsenals instead of negotiating disarmament, and it estimates that they will spend $1 trillion on those arsenals over the next decade.
"I personally see it as kind of David and Goliath, except that there are no slingshots involved," David Krieger, president of the California-based Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, told The Associated Press. He is acting as a consultant in the case. There are hopes that other countries will join the legal effort, he said.
Good faith is a jokeThe countries targeted also include Russia, Britain, France, China, Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea. The last four are not parties to the 1968 Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, but the lawsuits argue they are bound by its provisions under "customary international law." The nonproliferation treaty, considered the cornerstone of nuclear disarmament efforts, requires negotiations among countries in good faith on disarmament.
Pacific ocean...where Godzilla came fromWhere is marshal islands?
Or die...What's the point? Humans won't learn until they have thrown nukes at each other few times, then maybe just maybe we might learn a lesson.
Or die...
A couple of nukes have already been fired in the previous century. What that led to was a race among everybody to get nukes.I think after firing few nukes humans will eventually learn a lesson or two but i won't hold me breath for it.
A couple of nukes have already been fired in the previous century. What that led to was a race among everybody to get nukes.