What's new

Time for Pakistan & Russia to mend fences: Russian Media

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
Time for Pakistan & Russia to mend fences: Russian Media

Relationship between Pakistan and the former Soviet Union followed an ‘on-again and off-again' model, oscillating between ‘cordial' to ‘hostile'. Conscious of the need for sustained bilateral relations, the two countries did work in that direction through exchange of visits at the highest level that concluded with the promises for mutual cooperation and collaboration, but their divergent geopolitical interests and overpowering alliances did not allow them to come closer.

Mainly it was the Indo-Soviet and Pak-US alliances that proved to be the stumbling block.

Pakistan's felt threatened from close Indo-Soviet military and economic ties, Soviet support to India on Kashmir dispute and an aggressive Indian posture.

This drove Pakistan into seeking US protection and military assistance and led it to join American sponsored defence pacts - SEATO and CENTO, which essentially aimed at containment of communist Russia and China, giving only a false sense of security to Pakistan.

Pakistan also became wary of the indirect Soviet role by way of strengthening Indian hands in undertaking the dismemberment of Pakistan in 1971 that came on the heels of Indo-Soviet Treaty of Friendship (August 1971) and massive arms sales on concessional terms.

The lowest point in Pak-Soviet relationship was reached when the Soviet forces marched into Afghanistan. This aggravated Pakistan's security concerns which found itself in a nutcracker with an aggressive India in the east and a pro-Indian USSR in the west that was perceived to be keen at pushing its way down to the Indian Ocean, cutting through Balochistan.

This threat perception led Pakistan to support the Afghan resistance that was later joined by the US who saw in this a great opportunity to avenge its own humiliation of Vietnam.

But now, some thirty years after Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and some twenty years after Soviet collapse, the world stands substantially changed, continuing to change dramatically.

With today's international political and geopolitical landscape fundamentally different from that of the second half of the twentieth century, Russia - that succeeded the Soviet Union, now faces new realities - global, regional and domestic.

Showing a dramatic recovery from the chaos of 1990s, Russia is now poised to play the role of a world power center. It is working to regain its influence in Central Asia through Shanghai Cooperation Organization in tandem with China, both of whom now work closely to stem the tide of American expansionism in that region.

Russia is expected to assume a proactive role in relation to Afghanistan when the Americans and NATO forces leave. And importantly, it needs to create new alliances in regions of Asia that it has not actively pursued.

There has also been a shift in the Pakistan's security situation. It is no more entirely dependent on the US for its defence needs. It enjoys a nuclear-based security environment that has neutralized the Indian threat and is rapidly moving towards self sufficiency in the production of conventional defence equipment, the most recent being the production of a high performance multi-role aircraft jointly with China.

Although this gives Pakistan enough room to maneuver in the area of foreign and defence policy, its poor economic performance keeps it dependent on US economic assistance.

It is imperative for Islamabad to turn its economy around ASAP and, respecting strong public pressure, cut itself loose of Washington's stranglehold to regain independence in policy making.

It is in Pakistan's strategic interest to initiate politico-military outreach towards other global power centers and follow a balanced and broad based foreign policy. Its dependence on the US has neither served it well in the past nor does it hold any promise for the future.

While Russia was pulling itself together in the 1990s, its old ally, India, moved closer to the US with an eye on latter's investment, technology, weapon systems, civilian nuclear capability and above all on the attainment of regional power status.

The US wooed it to ingress its huge market and install it as a proxy in South Asia in pursuit of its policy of encirclement of Russia and China.

With countries big and small, powerful and not so powerful, redefining their priorities in the changing political environment and realigning themselves to promote new security and trade arrangements to suit their national interests, there is no reason why both Russia and Pakistan should not begin a new relationship, one that suits their needs and promotes peace in this part of the world.

The current leadership of both countries can begin to build on what leaders from Ayub Khan to Musharraf and Kosygin to Putin were able to achieve. Their achievements included the Soviet mediated Tashkent Declaration of peace between India and Pakistan after 1965 war, Soviets assistance in the oil & gas and the power sector and the landmark project of Pakistan Steel Mills.

On Pakistan's part, it was among the first to recognize Russia as the successor of the USSR and it assisted Russia in getting an observer status at the OIC and Moscow, which was reciprocated by Russia in helping Pakistan gain similar status at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

Unfortunately, however, the full potential of a bilateral relationship has not been realized. Islamabad has in the past shied away from moving closer to Moscow for fear of upsetting Washington, a mindset that is now changing. On its part, Russia has indicated its readiness to open doors, even for military cooperation.

On the heels of a meeting between Russian and Pakistani presidents during the SCO conference last June, came Pakistan's army chief, General Kayani's visit to Moscow that apparently explored military cooperation. This signals a policy shift, indicating that Pakistan is not ruling out such an arrangement.

The Russian Duma has established a Group of Friendship with Pakistan - a measure that should now be reciprocated by Pakistan's parliament.

The Inter-governmental Commission on Trade and Economic, Scientific and Technical Cooperation needs to be made functional and trade and investment potential explored. Russian help in the energy and power sector would be critically important.

Contacts between the two governments notwithstanding, people of both countries have generally remained alien to each other. A prolonged American propaganda against communism and the Soviet Union created the image of that country as an aggressive and an evil empire.

This was later reinforced by the negative perception created by the Soviet misadventure in Afghanistan. This, coupled with lack of opportunities to interact, prevented Pakistanis from coming closer to the people of Soviet Union.

But now with Russia having replaced the Soviet Union, communism fading out, glasnost encouraging the Russian society to open up and Russia reshaping its policies to meet the challenges of the new millennium, Pakistanis need to see Russia in a positive light.

But to change negative perceptions, there is need for dissemination of positive information and people to people contacts.

The Russian people have to also come out of their shell. Historically, they have looked westward for trade, tourism and cultural exchanges. They now need to begin fraternizing with their neighbors in Asia.

Cultural exchange, scholarships, and student and academia exchange programs between Russia and Pakistan could cover the gap to a large extent and must be facilitated by both sides. Pursued with diligence, this could initiate a new era of friendship and cooperation between the two countries.


Time for Pakistan and Russia to mend fences - English pravda.ru
 
.
An exceptionally sympathetic composition - honestly, I don't when I have read a piece about Pakistan/Russia relations in the Soviet or Russian press that is as sympathetic and inviting as this piece.
 
. .
An exceptionally sympathetic composition - honestly, I don't when I have read a piece about Pakistan/Russia relations in the Soviet or Russian press that is as sympathetic and inviting as this piece.

Considering that its written by a Pakistani National, and that too who has a trend of Anti American writings, I hardly find it surprising.
 
.
As usual manipulation of the heading and contents of the aricle by Srilankan. How he conveniently adds "Russian Media" but deletes a vital piece of info :rolleyes:




some background:
Shahid R. Siddiqi began his career in the Pakistan Air Force, and later joined the private sector where he was until recently in a senior management position. At the same time, he worked as a broadcaster with Radio Pakistan and was the Islamabad bureau chief of the English weekly magazine, “Pakistan & Gulf Economist“.

:rofl:
 
. . .
Sri Lankan!!!! He will never change!!!! :no: :rolleyes:




I also thought differently reading the article! Russia-Pakistan relationship, yeah good but why so much talks about India!
 
.
russians can be good friend of pakistan... they can be trusted... they will help you when you are in trouble.... we have closely examined them and they have cleared all the exams... with excellent marks....

but same cant be said about pakistan.... (no offence)
 
.
Wah wah! I recently posted an article on this forum which was authored by an Indian citizen but appeared in Pakistan's DAWN newspaper. It took me several pages of back and forth to even get my Indian friends to *acknowledge* forthrightly that the article was written by an Indian! The argument I had been getting from my friends across the border was that publication in a Pakistani newspaper reflected the newspaper's opinion/wishes/posture etc. and the only reason the Indian author was published was because his views "pleased" Pakistanis.

Well, if one were to apply the same argument here, couldn't one say that since Pravda is *the* premier russian news source and has a long history of being a state mouthpiece, that an article appearing in its pages has a fairly strong connection with what is being contemplated in the echelons of power in Russia? That regardless of the piece being authored by a Pakistani pen, it "pleases" the Russians?

Either way, coming to the article itself, I think its rather balanced. It points to perfectly valid high level quid pro quo, cooperative diplomatic successes scored by Russia and Pakistan. With the recent news of unrestricted RD-93 supplies, it does appear that Russia is continuing to warm up to Pakistan. And why shouldn't it? India has certainly jumped the fence, why should Russia not pursue a balanced policy between Pakistan and India? After all, no one in Russia is blind to the fact that India is no longer as fast a "friend" as it once was.

[As a complete side note, I saw earlier today that Russia's population is now close to 20% muslim. I think good relations with muslim states will also add to domestic stability in Russia.]
 
.
but same cant be said about pakistan.... (no offence)

To be fair, I think you need to ask our friends :-)

Please ask the Chinese, Turks, Saudis or the Emiratis whether they trust Pakistan. In my humble opinion, they trust Pakistan absolutely. For decades, royal security in numerous Arab countries was secured by Pakistani soldiers. After the UAE, the country where the Nahyan royal family has the most palaces is Pakistan. They are all over, from Lahore to Rahim Yar Khan to Karachi.
 
.
@muse
I suspect that most prejudge the incoming message.I always work around facts so that no one can deny.If someone come forward and help the person in the sinking ship I take it as a help not a beg.To me the facts are suggesting that they yet are not willing to take the step which you are looking for.
 
.
To be fair, I think you need to ask our friends :-)

Please ask the Chinese, Turks, Saudis or the Emiratis whether they trust Pakistan. In my humble opinion, they trust Pakistan absolutely. For decades, royal security in numerous Arab countries was secured by Pakistani soldiers. After the UAE, the country where their royal family has the most palaces is Pakistan. They are all over, from Lahore to Rahim Yar Khan to Karachi.

Russians were ready to fight indian war... they were ready to send their armies in one of the war (wont like to mention the war name to save thread) their president remained in India and extended his visit because at the same time US announced that its army(naval) was on its way to attack india.... He said he will leave india only after having view on the ships ... the ships never came to Indian shores....

can any one of the above you mentioned has the guts to show their friendship up to such an extent??
 
.
I think the answer is embedded in the question... the Russians responded to Nixon's promised "fleet". Who was that fleet coming to assist? The Chinese prevented the eastern front from materializing in 1965. The Iranians and Jordanians gave us F-104s and Sabres for free. Our planes used Iranian bases during the 1965 war with India. According to Indian sources, China "gave" us ballistic missiles when Pakistan was under sanctions in the 1990s (I don't believe it, but apparently you do). China continues to take a strong position on Kashmir (stapled visas etc.). The Saudis, Iranians etc. all support OIC resolutions condemning India. Jordan, Morocco and Saudi Arabia helped veto Indian observer status at the OIC during the Rabat conference ignoring all consequences... because Pakistan was upset. China is giving Pakistan nuclear reactors, one after the other, in defiance of a lot of significant players. The Turkish President's wife (a Doctor by training) personally came to Pakistan and stayed for an extended period looking after folks impacted by the floods - herself! Which other country has the Turkish President's wife personally extended her services to in this fashion? I just got back from Istanbul day before yesterday. There are posters and banners all over the largest Turkish city asking all Turks to send the "Brother's share" this Eid-ul-Azha to their Pakistani brethren. No other country is even named or mentioned.

One can go on and on... but in short, yes, I think we have excellent friends.
 
.
If someone come forward and help the person in the sinking ship I take it as a help not a beg.To me the facts are suggesting that they yet are not willing to take the step which you are looking for.

I take your point, but to me, always one has to help themselves, only then can others offer to help - and relations with other states are usually based on mutual benefit, not one party behaving as if lame and demanding to see "generosity" from others.

respect begins with respecting ourselves, I'm sure you'll agree.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom