India should not be the standard for you guys. Please aim much higher - India is an extremely poor nation. Shouldn't you aim for the living standard of Western Europe or North America?
Here is funny part from some insane Indians:
An insane Indian: your Tibet policy svcks. Set them free.
A sane person: Tibetans are free to believe or not to believe, to believe what to believe. They are free from starvation and poverty unlike India where religious violence and prosecution happens on daily basis and millions of children die of huger every year. Tibet GDP is many times higher than your India's.
The insane Indian: "India should not be the standard for you guys. Please aim much higher - India is an extremely poor nation."
The sane person: WTF! Why don't you fix your own @ss before you pointing your f!lthy finger to other people. LOL! You are penniless and you laugh at a person with
only million dollar and say he's a pauper?
The insane Indian: you don't know our Indian logic. We Indians always "aim for the living standard of Western Europe or North America" though we have millions die of starvation. Don't you heard our PM Singh said once: in 4 years world forgets Shanghai, talks only Mumbai? Though many 4 years past Shanghai is still shinier than Mumbai, but do you understand our Indian logic? Vee the Indians!
The sane person is speechless and
the insane Indian wins with poverty, starvation, illiteracy, religious violence, corruption, and no real freedom.
Best line to take against the Chinese - a line which they never answer -
If Tibet was always a part of China, then why did China sign the 17-point Agreement with Tibet to take it over? Did it sign any such agreement with any such Agreement with its other provinces?
To fix your hopeless Indian logic: there was a regime change in China and ROC did not dispatch the army to Tibet whereas PRC needed Tibetans to agree for that. Unlike Indians, without any agreement they would occupy Goa, Hyderabad, Kashmir...
In retrospect, I think Mao did a right decision to put India in check. Otherwise, insane Indians would be more reckless today.
2.7 million people in Tibet, 2.5 million are Tibetan, 92% are Tibetan, pls fill something in your empty brain but guess,
bc 700 10million in Tibet
bc 1700 2million in Tibet
bc 1951 1.5million in Tibet
now 2.7 million
you can call for the Slaveholder back and make it to 0.0001 million, and call others see the Tibetans Ruins in Museum in 2200
Remind you a fact: Indians have high illiterate rate. Spare him with numbers. God(s) only bestow many of them with big mouths but small brains.
This is bound to happen for sure. If Tibet is to become another country, it would be a major country where we won't be required to take passports or visa.
In your typical Indian dream.
A similar kind to "in 4 years the world forgets Shanghai, talks Mumbai".
The world indeed only talks Mumbai and forgets Shanghai about terrorists activities.