What's new

Three sisters kill man booked for blasphemy in Sialkot

Correct in the perspective of human life and human rights.
What? You mean Islam can only exist where there are Western freedoms?

Well.... don't know who to blame.... a guy name Zia ul Haq who implement this law or who ...
The original betrayal of the ideals of Pakistan was the Objectives Resolution, which enshrined the State in the who-is-a-Muslim business, something Jinnah had ruled out. Zia merely carried such bigotry to an accepted extreme.

I literally scared.... if god forbid anyone of us walking down the street in Pakistan and anyone come forward and point finger and accuse anyone of us...........................what will happened next... Just shouting few words is good enough to kill us................. its scary
Yeah, it now looks like only accusation and punishment are important, not evidence. Angry righteous passions must be fulfilled right away!

I don't like where this is going. It doesn't appear safe to talk or walk without support and witnesses? So people will be moving and challenging each other in groups instead. You could have pitched battles on campus or the streets if the police continue to stay on the side and do nothing.

Then Pakistanis will be vulnerable to some demagogue who promises order on the streets in exchange for your loyalty and remaining freedom and ZAP! - you'll be living in a tyranny. One way to avoid that is the way America's Founders did: build a deep hatred for tyranny and suspicion of the State. But most of Pakistan's leaders have sought greater and greater centralized power instead, even at the cost of more than half the country.

90% of Pakistanis don't even know what Zionism is. Don't bring things where it doesnt belong, this has nothing to do with the racist ideology of Zionism.
Can you convince a riled-up crowd of that before they scream "treachery!" and hammer you?
 
. .
I am sure the courts will review things and form a joint comission

Politicians will "Take Notice"
 
Last edited:
.
What? You mean Islam can only exist where there are Western freedoms?

The original betrayal of the ideals of Pakistan was the Objectives Resolution, which enshrined the State in the who-is-a-Muslim business, something Jinnah had ruled out. Zia merely carried such bigotry to an accepted extreme.

Yeah, it now looks like only accusation and punishment are important, not evidence. Angry righteous passions must be fulfilled right away!

I don't like where this is going. It doesn't appear safe to talk or walk without support and witnesses? So people will be moving and challenging each other in groups instead. You could have pitched battles on campus or the streets if the police continue to stay on the side and do nothing.

Then Pakistanis will be vulnerable to some demagogue who promises order on the streets in exchange for your loyalty and remaining freedom and ZAP! - you'll be living in a tyranny. One way to avoid that is the way America's Founders did:mild a deep hatred for tyranny and suspicion of the State. But most of Pakistan's leaders have sought greater and greater centralized power instead, even at the cost of more than half the country.


Can you convince a riled-up crowd of that before they scream "treachery!" and hammer you?
Zia ul haq was a true muslim and a hero to the masses.
 
. .
yes and Zardari is the most honest person in this world, Bhutto's nationalization was the best thing ever happened to this country and talibanization of Pakistan is the future and way to go.
Bhutto's nationalization destroyed the country.
Zardari is a thief and everybody knows that.

Zia ul Haq had the guts to stand up to the Russians/Soviets in the soviet war in Afghanistan.

What? You mean Islam can only exist where there are Western freedoms?

The original betrayal of the ideals of Pakistan was the Objectives Resolution, which enshrined the State in the who-is-a-Muslim business, something Jinnah had ruled out. Zia merely carried such bigotry to an accepted extreme.

Yeah, it now looks like only accusation and punishment are important, not evidence. Angry righteous passions must be fulfilled right away!

I don't like where this is going. It doesn't appear safe to talk or walk without support and witnesses? So people will be moving and challenging each other in groups instead. You could have pitched battles on campus or the streets if the police continue to stay on the side and do nothing.

Then Pakistanis will be vulnerable to some demagogue who promises order on the streets in exchange for your loyalty and remaining freedom and ZAP! - you'll be living in a tyranny. One way to avoid that is the way America's Founders did: build a deep hatred for tyranny and suspicion of the State. But most of Pakistan's leaders have sought greater and greater centralized power instead, even at the cost of more than half the country.


Can you convince a riled-up crowd of that before they scream "treachery!" and hammer you?
What did Jinnah rule out. LOL you know nothing about Pakistan. Please back off!
 
. . . . .
legitimacy that is provided to their actions through blasphemy law.


Seriously? Come on why remain so short sighted, why not criticise the real source?................. Does this man made law promise them heaven for such killings? 72 Virgins in case of men? Promise of eternal life full of blessings?

There is only one source that promises them all these things, the source frequently used by Pakistani Muslims to justify all their idiotic and wrong actions, the source of division amongst Muslims .............. and that source is not Quran but the literature that was collected and gathered centuries after passing of Messenger (Peace be upon him), to distort the message of Quran and spread hatred and anarchy. As long as Islam in Pakistan remains 5% Quran + 95 % traditions and hearsay ........ there is no hope for justice, no hope for improvement, no hope for any progress, people would get killed for even calling spade a spade.

Pakistani society has the choice to remain unjust, and corrupt or mend their ways and enjoy what Quran has promised them in return by following its message .......... if they choose to remain the way they are, sending another Halaku khan won't be any trouble for ALLAH.

And again for me its sufficient that ALLAH raised His (peace be upon him) fame high. Now any petty human can try insulting Him but what matters for me (on individual level) is ...... should I be worried when ALLAH has promised us following.

وَرَفَعْنَا لَكَ ذِكْرَكَ
 
.
SIALKOT: Three armed burqa-clad sisters on Wednesday shot dead a man near Sialkot after accusing him of committing blasphemy 13 years ago.

Police managed to arrest the three suspects and identified them as Amna, Afshan and Razia.

The incident took place in Nangal Mirza village, Pasrur tehsil.

According to the police, the three women went to the house of Mazhar Hussain Syed, a faith healer, and asked him to pray for them. They also asked him if his son, Fazal Abbas, had returned from abroad. When told that he had returned from Belgium, they asked if they could see him. As soon as Abbas, 45, appeared before the women, they opened fire on him with the weapons they had brought with them secretly. Abbas died on the spot.

The women raised slogans in jubilation after his death, asserting that they had finally eliminated a blasphemer.

The women, in their statement to police, alleged that Abbas had committed blasphemy in 2004, but “we couldn’t kill him at the time because we were too young then”.


The police confirmed that they had registered a case against Abbas in 2004 under Section 295-C (use of derogatory remarks, etc., in respect of the Holy Prophet) of the Pakistan Penal Code at the Pasrur City station, but he fled abroad soon after.

The suspect had recently returned from abroad and promptly obtained pre-arrest bail from a local court.

The body was taken to the Pasrur Civil Hospital for autopsy.

Published in Dawn, April 20th, 2017
lol
 
.
You mean to say in a country where thousands support the murdering ashiqs who kill without proof and thinking, such murders happen. Shocking.

Quite frankly I have come to the conclusion that blasphemy law itself is not an Islamic law and in its truest form a black law. It contradicts Islam itself and its very belief. Truly jahalat reigns supreme when those that claim greateat love with islam support this law. But that's another story.


No matter what law, nobody and I mean nobody is allowed to take law into their own hands. Such an action demands they be hanged. The laws can be questionable but they are still law of the land. Those three ashiqs should have contacted the police or lodged an FIR against him rather than take law into their own hands. All three must be hanged for such an action. I hate those that take law into their own hands. No matter what the reasons or issues with the legal system you are not allowed to do this. You yourself weaken the law of the land by partaking in such illegal activities. Stupid idiots. Their evidence is that when they were children they heard somebody say it. He wasn't even convicted by any court.

Lodging of the FIR is not a verdict of guilty. It is simply a request to investigate a crime stated by the complainant. It then goes to court after which the court decided on the investigation report and evidence whether a person was guilty or not and then charges him so.

All these stupid moronic idiotic ..... Heard was somebody saying he committed blasphemy. This is bullshit. This is bullshit in out society. Is mulk ka koi haal nahi hain.
 
.
WOOOAAAHHHH....... Thats some fcukd up future for the Country. Rein in your Jihadi Mullahs before this country of yours turn into Zombieland with walking talking zombies sniffing for blasphemers!

Really? How is this different from a mob lynching a man for "Allegedly" eating Beaf? Clean your own f**king house before giving advice to others...
 
.
This is not blasphemy, it has some other reasons but people now are taking benefit of blasphemy and killing each other because it's a law in country.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom