What's new

Three Chinese airlines to purchase nearly 300 Airbus aircraft

Drug use at work is a common topic for discussion. The workers we heard from think that Boeing’s drug testing policy is laughable, saying that the only time you get tested is if you get hurt or “do something wrong like drive into the plane or something”.

Worker B: It’s all coke and, um, painkillers and, what’s the other one… You can get weed here, you can get some really good weed here.

Worker A: Really, like in the plant?

Worker B: Yeah.



Generalize much? All you have is some claims from a few workers made to a foreign news outlet 8 years ago. :D

Just curious, are airplane factory workers in communist China allowed to talk to foreign news media without pre-approval or supervision?

Maybe they prefer workers with African and Mexican ancestry and two mothers.

Maybe you are a prejudiced racist of the worst kind allowed to spout your vile filth here?
 
.
Generalize much? All you have is some claims from a few workers made to a foreign news outlet 8 years ago. :D

Just curious, are airplane factory workers in communist China allowed to talk to foreign news media without pre-approval or supervision?



Maybe you are a prejudiced racist of the worst kind allowed to spout your vile filth here?
Racism?
Obviously, I'm just laughing at the LGBT movement. What does this have to do with racism?
 
.
Generalize much? All you have is some claims from a few workers made to a foreign news outlet 8 years ago. :D

Just curious, are airplane factory workers in communist China allowed to talk to foreign news media without pre-approval or supervision?



Maybe you are a prejudiced racist of the worst kind allowed to spout your vile filth here?
Boeing even lost the trust the FAA once maintained in its products on This year

In February, the FAA said it would not allow Boeing to self-certify individual new Boeing 787 planes. Then-FAA Administrator Steve Dickson said the agency needed from Boeing “a systemic fix to their production processes. They’ve got to produce the quality on their production line that we’re looking for and that they’ve committed to.”

The FAA said in February it would retain the authority to issue airworthiness certificates until it is confident “Boeing’s quality control and manufacturing processes consistently produce 787s that meet FAA design standards.”

 
.
I take a look at Boeing 2021 annual report. In 2021 Boeing spent 184 millions USD for R&D. Meanwhile it spent 174 millions of stock options. And Boeing spent 4 billions share buyback per year for 10 years from 2010 - 2020.

This is a cancerous company that will go bankrupt.

Anyone who trust MBAs today are idiots.


***********************

1656939852989.png


Boeing, which has been struggling for the past year with the safety of its 737 Max jet, has spent over $43 billion buying back stock over the past decade.


 
.
Boeing even lost the trust the FAA once maintained in its products

The FAA is doing its job, that is all: it sent back a few documents to be completed again in detail according to its requirements. The overall system of checks and balances works quite well.
 
.
FAA predicted more 15 fatal crashes on MCAS alone for MAX entire lifestyle very much earlier. They never took action.

FAA is totally corrupted.

The chief scientist would be expected to be reward handsomely by Boeing for keeping quiet.


************

The internal FAA review, dated Dec. 3, 2018, said 15 fatal crashes of the 737 Max were possible if there were no changes made to flight-control software that was implicated in both crashes, over the course of the plane’s lifetime, which would last decades.

 
.
The FAA is doing its job, that is all: it sent back a few documents to be completed again in detail according to its requirements. The overall system of checks and balances works quite well.
Yes, the system of checks and balances worked. Intercepting Boeing's problematic product, the FAA did not repeat the mistake of trusting a snake on the 737max. avoid more tragedies
 
.
if there were no changes made to flight-control software
And there were the changes made. :D

Yes, the system of checks and balances worked. Intercepting Boeing's problematic product, the FAA did not repeat the mistake of trusting a snake on the 737max. avoid more tragedies


LOL!

Spoken like a true godless commiebot against a free world company that makes far better airplanes than all of groulius China!. :D

The FAA will do its job, and Boeing will continue to improve its products. That process will continue.
 
.
LOL!

Spoken like a true godless commiebot against a free world company that makes far better airplanes than all of groulius China!. :D

The FAA will do its job, and Boeing will continue to improve its products. That process will continue.
Yes, the FAA needs to keep working hard not to let Boeing's quality problems cause more tragedies. Even after the tragedy of the 737 Max, Boeing continued to submit products with quality problems instead of ramping up testing. Once the FAA is negligent, the snake will again create tragedy.。
 
.
Once the FAA is negligent, the snake will again create tragedy.

What "snake" is this? Boeing is still better at producing airplanes than any made in China. Are you saying all the noble hard work in China is inferior to that done by a snake? :D
 
.
What "snake" is this? Boeing is still better at producing airplanes than any made in China. Are you saying all the noble hard work in China is inferior to that done by a snake? :D
It depends on what you say good.
In terms of safety, none of the Chinese-branded jetliners have been killed, what about Boeing? ? ?
 
.
It depends on what you say good.
In terms of safety, none of the Chinese-branded jetliners have been killed, what about Boeing? ? ?

Compared to the number of passenger-miles flown?
 
.
Compared to the number of passenger-miles flown?
Compared to passenger miles flown?
Since China's death record is 0, the number of deaths per kilometer passenger mile must be less than Boeing's
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom