What's new

Threat to destroy Indian N-plant stopped attack on Kahuta

Barrett

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Oct 28, 2009
Messages
793
Reaction score
0
Threat to destroy Indian N-plant stopped attack on Kahuta

By Iftikhar A. Khan


F16.jpg-608.jpg


ISLAMABAD: Pakistan had warned India in the early 80s that an attack on nuclear assets in Kahuta would evoke a retaliatory strike on its Bhabha Atomic Research Centre in Trombay.This has been revealed by the then Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal M. Anwar Shamim, in his book “Cutting Edge PAF” launched here on Thursday.

Defence Minister Chaudhry Ahmad Mukhtar, former Chairman of Joint Chiefs of the Staff Committee Admiral (retd) Iftikhar Ahmad Sirohey, former Air Chief Air Marshal (retd) Tanvir Mahmood Ahmad, Lt-Gen (retd) Kamal Matinuddin and former foreign minister Gohar Ayub Khan attended the ceremony.

According to Air Chief Marshal (retd) Shamim, he was called by the then president Gen Zia Ul haq in 1979 to discuss air defence of the nuclear assets in Kahuta. Gen Zia had reliable information that India was planning to attack and destroy Kahuta.

He says he told the president that Kahuta was an indefensible site because it was at three minutes flying time from the border. The reaction time was about eight minutes and by the time the PAF aircraft would reach the area the enemy would have completed the job and would be safe in their territory.

Gen Zia asked how could the most vital deterrent in the country’s armoury be defended and the answer was to acquire most modern aircraft and advanced weapons and the PAF would destroy India’s advanced nuclear facility at Trombay, if they embarked upon this rash course of action.

“We will inflict more damage to them than they can do to us”.

He says he told the president that the multi-role F-16 aircraft with the latest weapons were the best and most suited to meet PAF’s needs.He says that in 1981 the US administration offered F-5Es to be later augmented by F-5Gs, but Pakistan refused to accept any aircraft other than F-16s. This was finally accepted by the United States.

Pakistan received the first batch of F-16 aircraft in January 1983, and he wrote a letter to the president about the task given to him.

“I am now in a position to confirm that Indians will not attack Kahuta because it is amply clear to them that we will retaliate and launch an attack on their atomic station in Trombay, and knowing that they will suffer much more devastation than us, will desist from taking any unwise action”.

He says he told the then secretary of science and technology, Munir Hussain, who was going abroad to attend an international conference on atomic energy, to inform his Indian counterpart of consequences of any adventure to attack the nuclear assets of Pakistan.

When he talked to his Indian counterpart, he said: “No brother, we know your capability and we will not undertake such a mission.”

He says that he also requested Lt-Gen Sahibzada Yaqub Khan, the foreign minister at that time, to declare at an appropriate time the intention of retaliating if any action was taken against the country’s nuclear assets.

“I think he did that while he was in New York. I also invited senior editors of newspapers to inform them of the capability that we had acquired and safeguarded our nuclear assets. They asked pertinent questions and I answered them. As expected the news was published in Indian newspapers next day”.

DAWN.COM | National | Threat to destroy Indian N-plant stopped attack on Kahuta
 
.
Mods kindly merge, didnt notice the thread already exists.

cheers
 
.
Mod please get the above spammer. He is advertising indecent materials.
 
.
rooz ka mamool hey warned karna dono ka! karna warna dono nay kuch nahe hey! mazay super power jo bana hey lay raha hey! eek say paisa doosray ko destablize!
 
. .
This news appeared about 7-8 years ago and I remember watching a defense expert refuting this on TV. While I wont go into whether India actually planned to bomb Kahuta, according to the expert, the PAF planes would have to cross close to 700 km inside Indian territory to get to Trombay and escape upto 3 IAF stations with their SAM batteries. Doesn't seem plausible that Pakistan would even plan to do that let alone even make a threat. PAF is no Israeli AF and Indian is no Iraq.
 
.
This news appeared about 7-8 years ago and I remember watching a defense expert refuting this on TV. While I wont go into whether India actually planned to bomb Kahuta, according to the expert, the PAF planes would have to cross close to 700 km inside Indian territory to get to Trombay and escape upto 3 IAF stations with their SAM batteries. Doesn't seem plausible that Pakistan would even plan to do that let alone even make a threat. PAF is no Israeli AF and Indian is no Iraq.

if india had ever dared to intrude pakistani boundaries form bombing kahuta then it would had been obvious retaliation from Pakistan side remember pakistan was very much confident because paf at that time paf just acquired state of art f 16 for which bombing trombay would had been never a problem at that time .. :pakistan:
 
.
if india had ever dared to intrude pakistani boundaries form bombing kahuta then it would had been obvious retaliation from Pakistan side remember pakistan was very much confident because paf at that time paf just acquired state of art f 16 for which bombing trombay would had been never a problem at that time .. :pakistan:

I appreciate your patriotism and the resultant hullabaloo. What I was trying to say in my post was that, it was practically impossible for PAF to launch air-strikes on Trombay in the 80s. State of the art F-16s or not.
 
.
RobbieS in 80's the air balance was pretty much tilted towards Pakistan until you got the migs (The Mirages were not a big threat to far superior F-16's back then)It was in it's prime.IIRC F-16 has a range of well over 3500+KM so hitting a target within 700km would not be a problem.The losses probably woud've been higher but well worth it.
 
.
☪☪☪☪;950948 said:
RobbieS in 80's the air balance was pretty much tilted towards Pakistan until you got the migs (The Mirages were not a big threat to far superior F-16's back then)It was in it's prime.IIRC F-16 has a range of well over 3500+KM so hitting a target within 700km would not be a problem.The losses probably woud've been higher but well worth it.

No doubt about PAF's air superiority during the 80s. But I still find PAF's ability to deep strike Trombay in India as highly debatable. Did the older versions Falcons too have a 3500Ks? Plus as I said earlier, they'd have to cross a minimum if 3 known air bases in Gujrat and Maharastra. Not to count the SAM batteries. To me this news seems more of a fit for domestic political and military morale consumption.
 
.
No doubt about PAF's air superiority during the 80s. But I still find PAF's ability to deep strike Trombay in India as highly debatable. Did the older versions Falcons too have a 3500Ks? Plus as I said earlier, they'd have to cross a minimum if 3 known air bases in Gujrat and Maharastra. Not to count the SAM batteries. To me this news seems more of a fit for domestic political and military morale consumption.
yep, F-16 new versions have range of 4200+KM.Like i said before Kahuta was a major strategic location as such any attack on it would be too disastrous for Pakistan.The public would have literally gone on the streets demanding war not to mention military.I have no doubt that Pakistan would have gone to war with India if India tried to do something like this.Re: The attack like i said Pakistan would have attacked the reactor even if it meant high casulities on our side.A strike package of 25 F-16's at least few would have managed to get through.
 
.
I think he did that while he was in New York. I also invited senior editors of newspapers to inform them of the capability that we had acquired and safeguarded our nuclear assets. They asked pertinent questions and I answered them. As expected the news was published in Indian newspapers next day
_________________
orlando real estate
solar installations san joaquin county
 
Last edited:
.
☪☪☪☪;950967 said:
A strike package of 25 F-16's at least few would have managed to get through.

are you sure you had 25 F-16's in early eighties. You got 6 (4 F-16 A and 2 F-16 B) in 1983 and this BS report you are refering to says that India was planning attack in 1979. Now tell me from where did these sooper dooper 25 F-16s landed to threaten somebody. This is another piece of crap for consumption of local population and to create a devil out of India.
 
.
well india never had a guts to even come and cross the line of kahutta and never will
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom