Tija
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2011
- Messages
- 145
- Reaction score
- 0
We need to make less radioactive Thorium bomb and integrate it with pdv to make it intercept dozens of missiles.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We need to make less radioactive Thorium bomb and integrate it with pdv to make it intercept dozens of missiles.
Seriously why not? There are already nuclear capable SAM's to counter the below situation . Consider a shower of missiles with nukes and decoys heading towards India in a nuclear threat scenario then we (Even US) cant shoot them with existing BMD . Already thats proposed long ago . After all such weapons are 100% better than short range tactical Nukes to prevent nuclear attack.loll didnt make any sense to me??
Instead of directional warheads currently being employed in our PDVs, a thorium based explosive will have much larger kill radius owing to its high yield and also have very less radioactive fallout. Also, the weapon will be extremely light and the delivery vehicle can be made highly maneuverable. I highly doubt it though...loll didnt make any sense to me??
Seriously why not? There are already nuclear capable SAM's to counter the below situation . Consider a shower of missiles with nukes and decoys heading towards India in a nuclear threat scenario then we (Even US) cant shoot them with existing BMD . Already thats proposed long ago . After all such weapons are 100% better than short range tactical Nukes to prevent nuclear attack.
well no country has used thorium in missiles. pdv can already intercept multiple missiles and destroy them. soon to be tested. anyways if we can destroy a missile why should we waste our thorium or uranium. let the missile do the job.
lolz...well no country has used thorium in missiles. pdv can already intercept multiple missiles and destroy them. soon to be tested. anyways if we can destroy a missile why should we waste our thorium or uranium. let the missile do the job.
Thorium based weapons if made can prove to be less radio active and hence it can be implemented practically if every thing goes fine .
What if we destabilize the nucleus by injecting any uncharged particle ? Before making Uranium Bomb did any one expect such a huge explosion could happen? The only basis was Mass to energy conversion relation , out of no of tests Uranium and some other reactions proved to be successful and now they are used in war heads and reactors, we cant exactly predict the nuclear reactions though we use super computers or nuclear reaction simulators .One of the most attractive point of thorium is that it cannot sustain chain reaction, and thus unlikely to be used in a warhead!
What if we destabilize the nucleus by injecting any uncharged particle ? Before making Uranium Bomb did any one expect such a huge explosion could happen? The only basis was Mass to energy conversion relation , out of no of tests Uranium and some other reactions proved to be successful and now they are used in war heads and reactors, we cant exactly predict the nuclear reactions though we use super computers or nuclear reaction simulators .