What's new

THIS IS WHAT IRAN CALLED INDIA IN 2010 ,'Friend' Iran calls India a Zionist regime

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder what would Iran call this?

Are Kashmiri Shias The Next Pandits?


Are Kashmiri Shias The Next Pandits? | Tehelka - Investigations, Latest News, Politics, Analysis, Blogs, Culture, Photos, Videos, Podcasts
Fatima received a fatal injury in police action during sectarian clashes that broke out in Budgam district ofKashmir valley in July this year. According to her relatives, Fatima was looking for her grandson outside her house when she was hit on the head by a policeman. Nearly a week later Fatima succumbed. Usually the killing of a civilian by the police invokes the people’s wrath. People from all walks of life come out on the roads to protest the “brutality”; however, Fatima’s burial was a comparatively silent one. Perhaps the people were apprehensive about the implications their reactions might lead to. In a place where dying for a “cause” is routine, death on sectarian lines does not fit the usual scheme of things. Rather it raises many serious questions and puts forward some ugly challenges before society.

Fatima belonged to a Shia family. Shias are a minority among Muslims in Jammu &Kashmir.

Historically, the flourishing of the Shia sect in the Kashmir Valley is attributed to Mir Shamsuddin Araqi, a saint and religious scholar who came to Kashmirduring the reign of the Chak dynasty in the later part of the 15th century. The Chak rule is considered to be the only golden period for Shias in the whole history of Kashmir. However, it was just after the downfall of the Chaks that thepersecution of Shias started. After the Mughals, it was the Afghan rule inKashmir that became a threat for the Shiite community. The hatred for this minority was visible through plunders and massacres. It was during this period that the Shia community started practicing ‘Taqiyah’ (hiding one’s religious beliefs for one’s own safety) for safeguarding their lives and honour. Since then Shiites in Kashmir have seen many highs and lows.

In the year 1947 and after, Shiites took active part in the political affairs of the State. In many instances they were at the forefront of Kashmir’s struggle for independence – a sizeable population from the community also had to suffer at the hands of the State for their pro-Pakistan leanings. Munshi Mohammad Ishaq, a Shia leader was a prominent figure of the historic Plebiscite Movement. And during the armed uprising in Kashmir in the late 80’s the Shia community also had a militant outfit Hizb-ul-Mominoon (the party of the faithful). Many of this group’s ‘boys’ were either killed or arrested.

A scholar from the Shia community Ibne Muhammad (name changed) says, “The Shia community is a strong stake holder in Kashmir and we have been participating fully in the political struggle of Kashmir throughout its history.” Talking about the diversity of political thought within the community he says, “You can find a Shia presence across the political spectrum of Kashmir. There is a Shia leader in every major separatist and mainstream political party here.”

In spite of such active participation inKashmir’s political affairs, many incidents over the last two decades, especially the sectarian violence inPakistan, have created a serious threat perception among Shias in the Valley.

The Shia population in Kashmir lives in small pockets. In the capital citySrinagar they are mostly confined to Dal (Mir Behri), Zadibal and Shalimar areas. Budgam is the only town in the Valley where Shias form a majority.

But incidents and events over the past two decades have led to a situation where the Shia community has shrunk into small enclaves, gradually taking the shape of ghettos, a sharp contrast to earlier times when Shias and other Kashmiriminorities were scattered all along the interiors of Srinagar city. “The revival of sectarian based politics in Pakistan and Middle East, and the dramatic resurgence of anti-Shia forces there reinforced the fears of the community,” says Masroor Ansari, son of former Hurriyat president Moulvi Abass Ansari and the current president of Itehadul Muslimeen, a constituent of the moderate separatist amalgam Hurriyat Conference. He further says that fears actually worsened after the entry of foreign armed militants in Kashmir in the late eighties, with some militant groups actively supported by the Pakistani Wahabi organisations, perceived by the Shia community to be influenced by anti-Shia hate propaganda.

Although there is not much representation in the legislation, a few Shia politicians including representatives from Kargil are present in the State Assembly. Besides a senior leader of the main opposition party PDP, Moulvi Iftikhaar Hussain Ansari and a young politician Aga Ruhullah who is associated with the ruling partyNational Conference (NC) had a cabinet rank before the recent reshuffle.

Ansari reiterates that there has been manipulation through delimitation ofdistricts and tehsils because of which eight Shia community majority pockets inKashmir have now been reduced to only three. Recently, two cabinet ministers from the previous Council of Ministers, Qamar Ali Akhoon from Kargil and Aga Syed Ruhallah from Budgam, were dropped in the reshuffle. Only one member of the community, Firoz Khan from Kargil has been inducted as MoS (Minister of state). This can only be seen as a raw deal given to the Shia community, which has a population of 15 lakh in the state.
 
you are misinformed sir, the revolution happened because lots of reason , one of them the disgrunt with the west

Shah's Iran was against India and was with the West including US during former Indo -Pak wars .
So far we didnt aligned with West like that in any wars .We have been always neutral .We also stood up against Western sanctions. and even did the trade with Iran .
Your Zionist claim cant survive in here.
 
And when your leader called for "to sympathize and provide assistance to the nations of Afghanistan, Pakistan,", are he advocating for lessor puppets to west?

The fact is you people cant see beyond religion.

The sympathy with afgahnistan and paksitan are very high in iran , specially for afgahnistan , before the september 11th attacks ,, the Taliban killed and dragged iranian diplomats in Kabul , iran ammassed a huge force at the afghani border but to no avail everyone realized this was a show , cause iran would never invade a poor backward country like afghanistan , as for pakistan well the gas pipleline speaks for itself , you won't believe how much money iran has lost to the subcontinent in the past 8 years

Shah's Iran was against India and was with the West including US during former Indo -Pak wars .
So far we didnt aligned with West like that in any wars .We have been always neutral .We also stood up against Western sanctions. and even did the trade with Iran .
Your Zionist claim cant survive in here.

Shah's iran was a fool , lol , iran has also cooperated with the christian armenia against muslim azerbaijan , that's on a higher priority than Kashmir
 
Achha, toh 2010 ki baat ab yaad aayi. :tsk:
Anyway, it's Iran's choice to go on with India or not.
We have now good relations with Arabs, so importing their fuel, we have Kazakhstan to access central Asia and middle east.
They even allow our military presence there. I don't think how long can Iran can hang on it's anti Zion agenda, but my friend @MaarKhoor will be glad to know that his government signed deal with Arabians and rejected Iranian gas pipeline project.
:lol:
As Arabian interests are common here with India and Iranian ones are that with China, pak is aligned against China and in favour of India in this case.
:D
pak had a strategically important position between China-India and Middle East.
I guess you guys took correct decision. Now, we are in path of be becoming allies.
Suna @MaarKhoor ? we will be allies!!!!
 
The sympathy with afgahnistan and paksitan are very high in iran , specially for afgahnistan , before the september 11th attacks ,, the Taliban killed and dragged iranian diplomats in Kabul , iran ammassed a huge force at the afghani border but to no avail everyone realized this was a show , cause iran would never invade a poor backward country like afghanistan , as for pakistan well the gas pipleline speaks for itself , you won't believe how much money iran has lost to the subcontinent in the past 8 years



Shah's iran was a fool , lol , iran has also cooperated with the christian armenia against muslim azerbaijan , that's on a higher priority than Kashmir

Nations only cares about their interests not some religion or emotional sentiments.Iran has good practical foreign policy
Kashmiris Shias and minorities is still alive because of the Indian democratic rule
 
wink wink:D
tumblr_mlw7xtU0wD1qb4tlyo1_400.gif
 
pardon me , but most indians are openly hostile to anyone they perceive as muslim" , they would eagerly sell out a so called muslim to gain the approval of their western colleagues , and that's partly because what the zionist regime does charity in a poor country like india , or when earthquake happens in mianmar

You are right on the part that cultures of our land don't have a high opinion of foreign religions and you being Iranian should know why that is the case considering that the 'composite' history that we share is more violent than peace. We don't appreciate foreign religions creating demographic forceful changes here.

Simple. It is like your sense of identity is different, so is ours.

But you are wrong that we seek approval from the west for everything. If that was the case, we won't have traded with you during the heat of the sanctions in the first place. You see, the world isn't always 'either this or that'. There is a fine balance that is sometimes needed and for that, one needs serious thought and societal depth, which is lacking is most Middle Eastern governments.

Our foreign policy has seen both sanctions and has even come to blow at times, now striking the right balance between east and west after years of attempts to find a solid ground. Indian foreign policy is just too mature and sensible for countries on either side of the fence to understand.

We don't jump camps; we have our own and we want to keep it that way going into the future.

Looking at what the bandwagon jumps between USA and Russia historically have done to Middle East, I think it should be eye-opening enough to many people that if we can maintain good ties with Iran, we can do the same with Israel, with USA, with Russia, with China, with Japan and so on.

Our relations with any country are bilateral i.e. strictly between India and that country.

Period.
 
well thanks for at least approving part of my post , i guess the nice guys i met were bangladeshis afterall and not indian
 
pardon me , but most indians are openly hostile to anyone they perceive as muslim" , they would eagerly sell out a so called muslim to gain the approval of their western colleagues , and that's partly because what the zionist regime does charity in a poor country like india , or when earthquake happens in mianmar
In 1971 war when when Pakistanis were killing there bangladeshi Uma brothers, it was kaffir indians who showed middle finger to uncle sam 1971 War: How the US tried to corner India
and liberated the country within 14 days. By the way Iran under shah was giving both military and diplomatic support to Pakistan .

.Regarding accusation of zionist regime India did not have formal diplomatic relation with Israel till 1992,
 
Iran is a close friend of India, but that has not prevented its supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, from asking the world's Muslims to support the "struggle" in Kashmir against "Zionist regimes".

When the whole world was boycotting Iran it was only Indians who went out of way to keep paying for Iranian energy.
Iranian opinion is coming out of lunatic mullah blabber mouth and has little value...
 
Where's the source? this looks like a facebook post or some such. Also, the title makes no sense while considering the content matter in the OP. A rabble rousing troll thread that makes no sense with what the bot in the OP is implying
@waz @Irfan Baloch
Well, the level of discourse by some feather-brains here is legendary! They desperately are on the look-out for some idiotic brain farts that gives them orgasms.
 
When the whole world was boycotting Iran it was only Indians who went out of way to keep paying for Iranian energy.
Iranian opinion is coming out of lunatic mullah blabber mouth and has little value...



That's nonsense. Pakistan under the leadership of Zia allowed the Iranians to trade from Karachi.

Nations only cares about their interests not some religion or emotional sentiments.Iran has good practical foreign policy
Kashmiris Shias and minorities is still alive because of the Indian democratic rule



Pity that didn't help all the Indian Shia survive the Gujarat massacres carried out by Modi. I believe there were even 1 or 2 Indian Shia politicians in the collection of 10,000 Indian Muslims killed.
 
To all Indian and Pakistani members: Either ignore @jammersat posts or don't generalize it to other Iranians. Not a single Iranian member takes him seriously on this forum, and you better do the same. He said a while back all Jews should be kicked out from Iran (and banned for months after going on rampage of insults against all Iranian members).
 
In 1971 war when when Pakistanis were killing there bangladeshi Uma brothers, it was kaffir indians who showed middle finger to uncle sam 1971 War: How the US tried to corner India

No kid, it was an impotent 7 times larger country who got kick on the *** in 1948 and 1965 wars against much smaller country and decided that we impotent terrorist can not face Pakistan face to face hence we have to support proxies in Pakistan.. u funded and armed Mukti and other terrorists not for love of Humanity or love of Bengalis, u helped them bcoz u want to break Pakistan.. dont hide ur terrorism behind humanity...

your terrorists are still trying to legitimize their traitor ship but still Bangladeshis hate ur bhangi kind with Passion not Pakistan... @monitor @Al-zakir @asad71 Ummah brother still are our brother like before.. bcoz they are not blind they understand yindoos very well bcoz at some time of period they were hindu too like us :D
 
No kid, it was an impotent 7 times larger country who got kick on the *** in 1948 and 1965 wars against much smaller countries and decided that we impotent terrorist can not face Pakistan face to face hence we have to support proxies in Pakistan.. u funded and armed Mukti and other terrorists not for love of Humanity or love of Bengalis, u helped them bcoz u want to break Pakistan.. dont hide ur terrorism behind humanity...

your terrorists are still trying to legitimize their traitor ship but still Bangladeshis hate ur bhangi kind with Passion not Pakistan... @monitor @Al-zakir @asad71 Ummah brother still are our brother like before.. bcoz they are not blind they understand yindoos very well bcoz at some time of period they were hindu too like us :D
Dude the posters that you named are stranded pakistanis who had to face backlash after the war.
Stranded Pakistanis in Bangladesh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
'Stranded Pakistanis' living in camps in Bangladesh – in pictures | Global development | The Guardian
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom