....but Afghan refugees are different, and can be abused with impunity. Sauce for the goose is obviously no longer sauce for the gander [this is an English expression, and does not imply that the person being addressed is either a goose or a gander, or that he or she is covered with sauce].
No, we cannot. We have enough poor people. Since there are nations set up with the sole justification of providing a living space for the Muslims of south Asia, it is appropriate for those nations to step in. Their studied silence is shameful indeed.
West Bengal is the home for West Bengalis, and for Indian citizens who wish to re-settle there. It is nobody else's second home.
Good point.
You will have no difficulty in absorbing a few more.
Rohingyas are ethnically Bangladeshis, so as Pakistan is the original nation from which Bangladesh broke away, they are essentially Pakistanis. Pakistan must provide them refuge in Pakistan.
There are enough comforts for Muslims in India and they are not an endangered minority, quite unlike other nations in close proximity, whose endangered minorities continue to be endangered.
For your information, Pakistan was set up for the very purpose of providing a homeland for Muslims.
We are willing to provide legal permanent residence to Bangladeshis. They are not Bangladeshis, it would appear, as Bangladesh puts them in camps rather than permitting them to move out and mingle with Bangladeshis.
Bangladesh was sought by the Qaid-e-Azam, Jinnah.
We all know who is a homeland for Muslims; we all also know who are Muslims.
How thick are you? Muslims can take refuge in a Muslim country, particularly one that has been set up exclusively on the basis of religion, and has no other binding force, cementing them together.
You can either stand with Myanmar or stand with the Rohingya. If you stand with Myanmar, you stand with Myanmar against the oppressed, Muslim minority of Myanmar.
We are helping both Bangladesh and Myanmar. However, taking over responsibility for their refugees is not help; help is supporting their efforts at managing their refugees.
Isn't it strange? Two Muslim countries to choose from, and they choose a third country, that has sought to be neutral among religions. Please ignore that strange noise; that's the TNT wheezing its life away.
GREAT idea.
Where do you plan to set up shop to give the abandoned Biharis their papers to come to Pakistan?
It almost sounds as if you're saying that it is the BJP that is responsible for anti-Muslim and anti-Pakistan feeling in India, and that the normal people in India have nothing to do with it.
One was tempted to reply to your staggeringly insightful post, but it seemed that such a reply would be quite redundant.
When they do, we won't shed tears.
I don't get your point. You seem to want:
- Not to serve where we have bought visas to go and serve;
- Not to want to work;
- Us to want to stay on illegally.
Would you agree that this would constitute mentally certifiable, unstable behaviour?
