Ultima Thule
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2012
- Messages
- 16,725
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
200+ KG EXOCET CAN CARRYwell it depends, a single missile hit by Exocet small payload will not do much to an aircraft carrier.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
200+ KG EXOCET CAN CARRYwell it depends, a single missile hit by Exocet small payload will not do much to an aircraft carrier.
more like 165kg200+ KG EXOCET CAN CARRY
BUT ITS A PENETRATION OR BLAST FRAGMENTED WARHEADS THAT'S PENETRATE THROUGH THE HULL OF AIRCRAFT CARRIERmore like 165kg
still not enough. Indonesian Navy tested C705 (130kg warhead) against a small supply ship and it still floats, until a torpedo sends it breaking in two.BUT ITS A PENETRATION OR BLAST FRAGMENTED WARHEADS THAT'S PENETRATE THROUGH THE HULL OF AIRCRAFT CARRIER
The AShM missiles being designed and developed now no longer cater to the WWII like goal of sinking the entire warship. The modern AShMs are designed to hit the ships in the areas that are used for C4I. By disabling these assets on the ships, you render the platform ineffective. It would require additional ships to come to the disabled asset's aid thus depleting more resources.Not exactly sink Aircraft carrier ... although some precision hits might disable the operations
The AShM missiles being designed and developed now no longer cater to the WWII like goal of sinking the entire warship. The modern AShMs are designed to hit the ships in the areas that are used for C4I. By disabling these assets on the ships, you render the platform ineffective. It would require additional ships to come to the disabled asset's aid thus depleting more resources.
Imagine the Indian aircraft carrier disabled and marooned on the high seas and the ensuing effort to recover it.
The attack on USS Stark is a perfect example of what can be done to render a capability ineffective.
And your all Navy also sink by our all anti ship missiles from land sea air subsurface as a resultWhat u have written abt the modern Ashm might be true but
One cant in even dreams imagine Pakistan military capable of disabling or marooning Indian AC...
Whole PN will be at bottom of sea if ever comes out of hiding during war times.
What u have written abt the modern Ashm might be true but
One cant in even dreams imagine Pakistan military capable of disabling or marooning Indian AC...
Whole PN will be at bottom of sea if ever comes out of hiding during war times.
still not enough. Indonesian Navy tested C705 (130kg warhead) against a small supply ship and it still floats, until a torpedo sends it breaking in two.
Indonesia also tested MM40 exocet and chinese C802 against an LST (ex-KRI TELUK SEMANGKA), it still floats. you'll need bigger warheads against an aircraft carrier
To sink
It you will fire multiple and any way you need multiple shots to defeat ship defenses in the first place
A million dollar missile like Exocet Abd 3/5 per Ship to take out 50-200 million Ship is a bargain
lastly a direct hit on ship magazine may just need a single round of missile