Enigma SIG
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 8,593
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
Pakistan was undone in 1971 by napak fauj yo.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't realise Pakistan was an English acronym. I thought it was an Urdu neologism meaning "land of the pure". Maybe I shouldn't be surprised because the daddy of Pakistan was British imperial interests. If the poor Bengalis had realised it earlier, they wouldn't have had to endure being a Pakistani colony for 25 years.The word Pakistan is an acronym.
Jinnah at Army Staff College, 1948:Jinnah: There is no Power on Earth that can undo Pakistan...
Pakistan Army: Hold my DHA...
But in 1971 we had general who was only a drinker and not a Hafiz.There is No Power on Earth That can Undo Pakistan
............ Except there was Pak Army 1971 .
With friends like these who needs enemies .
To the contrary history proved being part of a Hindu majority india would lead to persecution by the Hindu majority which we see today in India. A separate Muslim state has more power than all the Muslims of India who are ruled by the Butcher.The truth is that most of the ulema opposed the Pakistan movement because they believed it will result in the division of Muslim power in the subcontinent. History proved them right.
Most Pakistanis' opinion on 1971:Pakistan Phauj can undo completely, done it once can do it again.
But technically what was said for what Pakistan, that has already been done in 71...Pak phauj jindabad
Most of it is just propoganda. The economic and social condition of the median Muslim in India and Bangladesh is better than the median Muslim in Pakistan . I don't know what you mean by " Muslim power" but what good is it if people are struggling to meet their daily needs. Bangladesh, which was way behind West Pakistan in 1971, wisely chose to become a secular state and is today ahead of Pakistan in HDI indicators, whereas Pakistan is a failed state.To the contrary history proved being part of a Hindu majority india would lead to persecution by the Hindu majority which we see today in India. A separate Muslim state has more power than all the Muslims of India who are ruled by the Muslim Butcher.
Shut up and go to your slum countryMost Pakistanis' opinion on 1971:
Good riddance. Bangladesh was never a part of Pakistan.
Ok YOU'RE HYPERPOWER OF THE UNIVERSE NOW HAPPY NOW SHOO GET LOST FROM HERE GO TO YOUR SLUM CRAP HYPERPOWER LOLMost of it is just propoganda. The economic and social condition of the median Muslim in India and Bangladesh is better than the median Muslim in Pakistan . I don't know what you mean by " Muslim power" but what good is it if people are struggling to meet their daily needs. Bangladesh, which was way behind West Pakistan in 1971, wisely chose to become a secular state and is today ahead of Pakistan in HDI indicators, whereas Pakistan is a failed state.
Islam is certainly not in any danger in India. The percentage of Muslims in the population has gone up from under 10% in 1950 to almost 15% today. Just compare that to what happened to the minority population of Pakistan. If partitioned India had four Muslim Presidents, imagine the political power the Muslims would have weilded in a united India where they would have had close to 40% of the population today. Anyway, it was probably for the best for India as we managed to avoid the hotbed of Islamic fundamentalism, but the big loser from the partition was Islamic power and the Muslims of the subcontinent. From being the rulers of the subcontinent, all the Muslims got was a moth-eaten West Pakistani wing. They lost even Kashmir and some of the Muslim districts of Punjab.
I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. That is completely unintelligible. Try harder. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and wait for a couple more posts before I put you on ignore.Ok YOU'RE HYPERPOWER OF THE UNIVERSE NOW HAPPY NOW SHOO GET LOST FROM HERE GO TO YOUR SLUM CRAP HYPERPOWER LOL
Most of it is just propoganda. The economic and social condition of the median Muslim in India and Bangladesh is better than the median Muslim in Pakistan . I don't know what you mean by " Muslim power" but what good is it if people are struggling to meet their daily needs. Bangladesh, which was way behind West Pakistan in 1971, wisely chose to become a secular state and is today ahead of Pakistan in HDI indicators, whereas Pakistan is a failed state.
Islam is certainly not in any danger in India. The percentage of Muslims in the population has gone up from under 10% in 1950 to almost 15% today. Just compare that to what happened to the minority population of Pakistan. If partitioned India had four Muslim Presidents, imagine the political power the Muslims would have weilded in a united India where they would have had close to 40% of the population today. Anyway, it was probably for the best for India as we managed to avoid the hotbed of Islamic fundamentalism, but the big loser from the partition was Islamic power and the Muslims of the subcontinent. From being the rulers of the subcontinent, all the Muslims got was a moth-eaten West Pakistani wing. They lost even Kashmir and some of the Muslim districts of Punjab.
Why you're rants against Pakistan on PDF and we knows what is the condition of Indian Muslims in ENDIAI have no idea what that is supposed to mean. That is completely unintelligible. Try harder. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and wait for a couple more posts before I put you on ignore.