What's new

The Worst day in Human History.

not a level argument, but still the blockage still first !

Japan drew First Blood. But USA finished the fight as the more powerful party. That is what happens. If you draw First Blood, then either kill off the enemy or the enemy will kill you. Simple and True.
 
.
Japan was far more brutal than Nazi Germany. Estimates say they killed 23 million Chinese.

Its sad they attacked the US. Just as dumb for the Germans to attack the soviets. You can't blame the Russians or Americans for fighting back. Unlike the Russians who would send man after man as cannon fodder, Americans doctrine was to limit losses on their side.
 
.
Japan was far more brutal than Nazi Germany. Its sad they attacked the US. Just as dumb for the Germans to attack the soviets. You can't blame the Russians or Americans for fighting back.

'Fighting'? Nice.
Compared to most Canadians I know, you seem to be the biggest case of worship-defend-murrica syndrome, why is that? Are you filipino origin?
 
.
'Fighting'? Nice.
Compared to most Canadians I know, you seem to be the biggest case of worship-defend-murrica syndrome, why is that? Are you filipino origin?[/QUO


Im simply stating the fact all is fair in war.
You really think the Japanese were humane?

Technology has always been used to win wars. The Japanese used modern tactics to brutalize the Chinese.
Or the British occupying you guys.
 
.
The way terrorists have been penetrated in Pakistani panaroma, no wonder they can gain access to Nukes. For them Shia, Ahmedi, Jew, Hindu, Christians, Hans are enemy. They will not mind using it...

Meri taraf se apko 7 topon ka salam :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
.
Japan drew First Blood. But USA finished the fight as the more powerful party. That is what happens. If you draw First Blood, then either kill off the enemy or the enemy will kill you. Simple and True.

you cannot justify atombic bomb blasts on cities, its shameful.

p.s. all is fair in love and war theory is not honourable nor justifiable as simple and true.
 
.
you cannot justify atombic bomb blasts on cities, its shameful.

p.s. all is fair in love and war theory is not honourable nor justifiable as simple and true.

I am not justifying anything, only describing reality. Japan attacked first. Japan was destroyed in defeat by a more powerful USA, atom bombs or no atom bombs.
 
.
I am not justifying anything, only describing reality. Japan attacked first. Japan was destroyed in defeat by a more powerful USA, atom bombs or no atom bombs.

who fired the first bullet argument is the most pathetic. as I already told you not a level argument, so aiding Allied forces against Japan through blockage eco/military were not part of declaring the war and is not part of the war?

please what is wrong is wrong, no matter who fired the first bullet.
 
.
who fired the first bullet argument is the most pathetic. as I already told you not a level argument, so aiding Allied forces against Japan through blockage eco/military were not part of declaring the war and is not part of the war?

please what is wrong is wrong, no matter who fired the first bullet.

Destroying a major naval base with hundreds of deaths as an unprovoked pre-emptive attack is hardly a "first bullet". Economic boycotts and sanctions are peaceful ways of conducting international policy. Bombing is not. It will get a response according to the resources of the one attacked.

Apney toon waddey naal panga low gey to jawab mein jootey parein gey.
(If you provoke the bigger guy, be prepared to get beaten up.)
 
.
Destroying a major naval base with hundreds of deaths as an unprovoked pre-emptive attack is hardly a "first bullet". Economic boycotts and sanctions are peaceful ways of conducting international policy. Bombing is not. It will get a response according to the resources of the one attacked.

Apney toon waddey naal panga low gey to jawab mein jootey parein gey.
(If you provoke the bigger guy, be prepared to get beaten up.)

I fail to see how it destroyed American military might, that it decided to nuke cities !

bandar hath machis tay terrorist hath nuke.. bak tadi marzi pa jee !
 
.
'Fighting'? Nice.
Compared to most Canadians I know, you seem to be the biggest case of worship-defend-murrica syndrome, why is that? Are you filipino origin?[/QUO


Im simply stating the fact all is fair in war.
You really think the Japanese were humane?

Technology has always been used to win wars. The Japanese used modern tactics to brutalize the Chinese.
Or the British occupying you guys.

Not necessary, nukes are always overkill. All is not fair in war, especially when one party claims to be god of human rights and considers the other primitive, so what you're saying is the allies were just as 'evil' as the axis?
Because whatever crime the Japanese committed, after the nukes no one's gonna sympathise with US. And this has nothing to do with us and the british occupation, most of the world outside Pakistan as well doesn't have a good opinion of this.
 
.
Not necessary, nukes are always overkill. All is not fair in war, especially when one party claims to be god of human rights and considers the other primitive, so what you're saying is the allies were just as 'evil' as the axis?
Because whatever crime the Japanese committed, after the nukes no one's gonna sympathise with US. And this has nothing to do with us and the british occupation, most of the world outside Pakistan as well doesn't have a good opinion of this.


Do you think USA really cares whether anybody sympathizes with it or not? They have done, and will do, anything that serves their national interests, sympathy or no sympathy.

All nations do the same.
 
.
Do you think USA really cares whether anybody sympathizes with it or not? They have done, and will do, anything that serves their national interests, sympathy or no sympathy.

All nations do the same.

They are growing unpopular amongst their allies (as in the Europeans [europoors are murricans like to call them]), they must care.
 
. .
I have no doubt that the invasion of Japan would have cost far more lives.
Overkill? I think not. The deaths of people are still the same regardless of whether they came at the hands of big bombs or small bombs.
The atom bomb had to demonstrate to the world what it could do, just once was enough.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom