The Western misconception that if they don't grace an international event, it loses importance

[Rajaraja Chola]

Appeasement and active alliance are quite different things.

Yea. Britain should have supported Czech . Instead of which Chamberlain travelled to meet Hitler to hand over a part of Czech to Germans in agreeing with the French. And he signed a non aggression pact. So I am not aware of any active alliances. But only active in Appeasement.

My unknowing friend. Why does every idiot think ww2 started in 1938 or 1939? Do you even realize what position Germany was in before that? Between ww1 and ww2? Germany had the right to exterminate any non-German European (especially the French and British) for what they put Germany through. The strongest and wealthiest European nation was put in a dog house. Not only Versailles, but also not allowing them to export anything, claiming every other market, having colonized half the world. How the hell can you imagine a Europe without German exports today? Read your history, not just the one your masters (GB) tell you to read.

And why are you telling this to me? Why does it matter it to me, when the Germans were humiliated in the first world war treaty when all their mines, factories were handed over to French. The fact Germany managed to rearm and fight is the fault of European nations alone.

And Russia had to bear the largest human loss in the world war, without whom, the victory would have delayed by atleast 1-1.6 years. And I read in history whatever u had mentioned me.

The fact I am trying to decipher is why you are trying to tell me all these when these arent even discussed. Stick to topic. Or else do not quote me

 

[Steve781]

Yea. Britain should have supported Czech . Instead of which Chamberlain travelled to meet Hitler to hand over a part of Czech to Germans in agreeing with the French. And he signed a non aggression pact. So I am not aware of any active alliances. But only active in Appeasement.



And why are you telling this to me? Why does it matter it to me, when the Germans were humiliated in the first world war treaty when all their mines, factories were handed over to French. The fact Germany managed to rearm and fight is the fault of European nations alone.

And Russia had to bear the largest human loss in the world war, without whom, the victory would have delayed by atleast 1-1.6 years. And I read in history whatever u had mentioned me.

The fact I am trying to decipher is why you are trying to tell me all these when these arent even discussed. Stick to topic. Or else do not quote me

I'm talking about the USSR and Germany having an active alliance from 1939-41.

 

[Götterdämmerung]

I'm talking about the USSR and Germany having an active alliance from 1939-41.

Where did you learn history? The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was a treaty of non-aggression, not an alliance.

 

[Steve781]

Where did you learn history? The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was a treaty of non-aggression, not an alliance.

There was a joint military parade after the partitioning of Poland.

 

[Götterdämmerung]

There was a joint military parade after the partitioning of Poland.

And yet, it was not an alliance. Poland was not the innocent lamb either, it, too, had its own aggressive agenda. Read a bit more into academic history docs and not the official narrative.

 

[TaiShang]

I say fcuk them.

Celebrate with friends, not with party crashing foreigners who act like their presence is of paramount importance. Their loss in not going, no one will miss them.

People will be watching the parade and celebrating China putting Japan back in place.

The perception that Chinese contribution in ww2 is minimal will change with rising Chinese influence and power. If I recall correctly, most Frenchman back in the late 40s were of the opinion that the Soviet Union was the country that toppled Nazi Germany. The West has lied so much that most now believe that the U.S.A brought down Hitler and the Third Reich.

 

[Oldman1]

Ever heard of the failed appeasement policy of Britain with respect to Germany? The Britain never declared war, until a time, it was shameful not to be declare war against Germany. If Britain can wait patiently so many years, even in the midst of German aggresion, why cannot Russia wait for its right time?

Last time I saw, there were self glorification of the western armies in their movies, without a thought for the soviets who had bled for the same. Shameful changing of history if you ask me.

Somebody hasn't watch Enemy at the Gates.

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

I'm talking about the USSR and Germany having an active alliance from 1939-41.

Then there was a alliance btw Britain and Germany till 1939. If you are ready to call non aggression pact btw Ger and Russia as alliance, then it can be considered same btw Ger and Britain, by speaking ur own language.

Somebody hasn't watch Enemy at the Gates.

Is it good? I will try to watch. Thanks

 

[Oldman1]

Is it good? I will try to watch. Thanks

Its ok.