What's new

The west is doing its best to help China

cirr

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2012
Messages
17,049
Reaction score
18
Country
China
Location
China
The west is doing its best to help China

US steel tariffs are just the latest in a list of blunders handing windfalls to Beijing

http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-us.s3.amazonaws.com%2F39b9aefa-215d-11e8-8d6c-a1920d9e946f

Donald Trump's blanket actions will make it easier for Xi Jinping to divide what we still call the west © AFP

Edward Luce YESTERDAY

Most of it is unintentional. Yet the west could not be helping China more if it tried. First we bet that China would consciously remake itself in our image. All we needed to do was nudge it along. That obviously failed. Then we reverted to the belief that history would steer the country to its liberal democratic endpoint — whether China knew of its destiny or not. Ditto.

Finally, we threw up our hands. China is plotting its own non-western course. All we can do is — what? Readers should fill in the blanks.

It is facile to lay all the blame on Donald Trump. To be sure, the US president’s proposed steel and aluminium tariffs are a case study in collateral damage. America’s allies will be hit far harder by Mr Trump’s friendly fire than Beijing. His blanket actions will make it easier for Xi Jinping, China’s “emperor-for-life” president, to divide what we still call the west.

But Mr Trump is only making a bad situation worse. The mess was something he inherited. Responsibility for the west’s blunders is all-inclusive. It bears everyone’s fingerprint — American, European, neoliberal and social democratic.

Each has been doing their bit to shift things in China’s direction. We are not yet a fifth of the way into the 21st century, but the west has already given Beijing three big windfalls. Mr Trump is working on a fourth.

The first was the 2003 Iraq war, which outweighs the damage the US president has caused so far. The war split the west between “old” and “new” Europe, as Donald Rumsfeld, the then US defence secretary, put it. It also cost the US and its allies more than $1tn in direct spending — and far more in opportunity cost.

The Iraq war also showed up the limits of the west’s military hard power. You cannot impose democracy at gunpoint. China watched while the west squandered its hard and soft power.

The second was the 2008 financial meltdown. The crisis debunked the myth that the west’s middle classes had been getting richer. As US investor Warren Buffett said, when the tide went out we saw how many were swimming naked. Western consumers had been borrowing beyond their means.

Many still refer to what followed as a global recession. In fact it was an Atlantic one. China has maintained strong levels of growth. As the west cut back on development lending, Beijing stepped into the breach.

From Africa to central Asia, democracy lost some of its allure. China’s Belt and Road Initiative was given its name last year. But it is at least a decade old. Last month, the democracy watchdog Freedom House announced the 12th consecutive year in which global freedom has fallen.

The third geopolitical gift to China is a work in progress — the west’s populist backlash. Whether you date it from the UK’s Brexit vote, or Mr Trump’s victory, its origins go much deeper. The decline in trust for western institutions has been under way for most of this century. We no longer believe our leaders work for us.

Italy’s election last Sunday was the most recent rebuke to the west’s technocratic classes. The rest of the world is watching closely. For the first time on record, China’s president has higher global approval ratings than America’s. Some — though not all — stems from Mr Trump’s awkward relationship with the truth. It is easy to mock those who think he “tells it like it is”. What they mean is that he speaks plainly. Even when he lies, Mr Trump’s meaning is easy to grasp. Alas, the rest of the world hears him all too clearly.

Is the US president the west’s greatest gift to China? That depends on how far he goes. For the time being, the answer is yes. America’s advantage lies in the strength of its alliances. China’s only treaty ally is Mongolia. The more Mr Trump undercuts friends such as Canada and Germany, the easier Mr Xi’s task of taking global centre stage. He is a cheerleader for China’s authoritarianism.

“I think it’s great,” the US president said of his counterpart’s decision to scrap China’s presidential term limit. “Maybe we’ll give that a shot some day.”

Some of Mr Trump’s critics took fright for the wrong reason. Even if he was being serious, there is scant chance he could make himself US president for life. The problem is that the rest of the world, including China, is taking Mr Trump seriously.

If I were a Chinese dissident, I would think about switching to gardening. Not only has America mislaid its faith in democrats abroad, it has lost its trust in democracy at home.

For the time being, the US is the emperor with no clothes.

https://www.ft.com/content/66f99e1c-2143-11e8-9efc-0cd3483b8b80
 
. .
For the time being, the US is the emperor with no clothes.

For the time being? That's way too optimistic.

Once the knowledge of the systemic corruption and contradictions in the US/Western model is made known, there is no way to take back that knowledge.

The world has already seen what the US has really always been: A fascist leaning neo-liberal fundamentalist country with strong private-media embedded into the state as a legitimation tool.
 
.
Just for the fun of it. Watch how Milton Friedman responded on the topic of US steel industry and import tariff. Then the bogey was Japan.

 
.
For the time being? That's way too optimistic.

Once the knowledge of the systemic corruption and contradictions in the US/Western model is made known, there is no way to take back that knowledge.

The world has already seen what the US has really always been: A fascist leaning neo-liberal fundamentalist country with strong private-media embedded into the state as a legitimation tool.

China complaining about systemic corruption and contradictions. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
. . . .
For the time being? That's way too optimistic.

Once the knowledge of the systemic corruption and contradictions in the US/Western model is made known, there is no way to take back that knowledge.

The world has already seen what the US has really always been: A fascist leaning neo-liberal fundamentalist country with strong private-media embedded into the state as a legitimation tool.
The west are now showing its true colors. I didn't understand years back. I doubt many could see through what US really is.
 
. . .
Trump is China's best CPC secret agent ever after Bush about his war things.

Well in some cases Trump may indeed indirectly help China.
But he is causing far more harm. He is unleashing a Mccarthyist surge across the world against China, he is changing military policy to go directly against China, he is disrupting the beneficial trade with China.
 
.
The west are now showing its true colors. I didn't understand years back. I doubt many could see through what US really is.

The West is just becoming the West. They turn fascist quickly anytime a crisis hits. The color and hue of this fascism will differ, so, you will have Hitler style fascism in the 1930s, and Bush style fascism in the 2000. Now, I guess, the West is evolving into a more genuine fascism.

If they cannot eat others, they start to eat each other. It is already happening because the places they can eat others are getting smaller in number.

Refugees much hate this secret CPC agent to the bone.
He is shutting every white-worshipping refugees' wild dreams.

THE CPC agent just elevated the US into a Junta run by military-intelligence guys from top to bottom.

I guess this is bad news for defenseless nations.

But good news for countries like China and Russia.

Well in some cases Trump may indeed indirectly help China.
But he is causing far more harm. He is unleashing a Mccarthyist surge across the world against China, he is changing military policy to go directly against China, he is disrupting the beneficial trade with China.

Indeed.

(Not that China needs others' favorable opinions. Respect, not love, is required for a country. Respect comes from power. Power generates respect.)

***

Perceptions of China grow positive
By Wei Jia
China.org.cn, March 13, 2018

A Gallup survey published earlier this month found that 53 percent of Americans view China favorably, demonstrating a marked increase over the past two years.

http://www.china.org.cn/china/NPC_CPPCC_2018/2018-03/13/content_50705038.htm
 
.
Indeed.

(Not that China needs others' favorable opinions. Respect, not love, is required for a country. Respect comes from power. Power generates respect.)


I used to believe like you in the realpolitik and realist school of foreign policy.

And those schools are still perhaps the single most important ones.

But we humans, are by and large, NOT completely rational creatures. We have emotions, ego, feelings, ideology, religion, and the confluence of a hundred other things.

And in these circumstances, raw power doesn't necessarily translate to respect. Soft Power, and the ability to put one's emotions forward are very necessary stuff.

Indeed one might argue that raw power itself can't be built without influencing people and their emotions and future actions.

As for gallup polls. Not all individuals matter equally. The fact is that of the constituencies that do matter, the business community, the defense community, think tanks, diplomats, politicians, media; all seem to be going on a witch hunt against China right now.
 
.
But we humans, are by and large, NOT completely rational creatures. We have emotions, ego, feelings, ideology, religion, and the confluence of a hundred other things.

Agree that human being is not entirely rational. In fact, they can go collectively quite irrational, like electing fascist leaders and cheering for them.

Hence the falsity of soft power. If people's beliefs, emotions, orientations are not really to be trusted, then, why build a soft power on those phony/shaky ground that may change/disappear overnight.

The US media, if they really wanted, can turn 85% of the US people against Japan in a month regardless of Pikachus and Manga. That's the reality. Power to mobilize resources is what really matters. This the source of US power.

China can spend a billion dollar to look very Pandaish in the eyes of the US people; but, the US government/media can turn the positive tide over easily. If nothing, they can even stage a false flag. Kill 2000 people in Madison Square Garden and blame it on China. Repeat it. Repeat more. I think they are capable of doing it.

So, what is left for China or other countries is hard power. Hard power so that people cannot reject it. Or, if they reject, the rejection brings costs only to them, not to China.

Soft power, however, may work on extremely poor countries. Not because they would love you for love's sake, but because they needed you (perhaps in return for development assistance or some investment.) I even tend see the close relationship China has with a certain power (which you guys do not like) under that light.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom