Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I personally don't see any problem with 3 terms as long as the leader is able to deliver, chances are even Modi might have a longer reign than Xi Jinping. India has no term limit.CCP has very perfect rules for building and promoting the echelon of officials. The problem now is that someone wants to break this rule.
You are just being stupid, for years everyone here knows I oppose Xi's third term in this forum, I also voice this oppostion on several Chinese social media platforms like many Chinese netizens do, anything bad happened to me?You are lucky to be able to say this due to Canadian connection and location.
Poor chaps with both .CN flags can’t say a word against Papa Xi. He is their supreme ruler for life who can do no bad.
You are right on that.If Franklin Roosevelt left White House after 8 years presidency, US may not become the most powerful country after ww2. If Bill Clinton had his 3rd term of presidency, China may never become such a threat to US.
Next 5 years will be China's most crucial time. China needs an experienced and strong leader at this historic turn point. Xi's third term was not decided by himself but by the CCP leaders group. Collective leadership is more important than anything.
China doesn't have enough check and balance in her leaders' selection system, a term limit serves perfectly to compensate this weakness. It may make some very capable leaders to retire prematurely but for this whole system to work, it must be stuck to unconditionally. China has 1.4 billion people, I don't think anyone can be so good to the point of not being able to be replaced for 10 years.There is no definite rule in the world, only the US most famously adheres to such practice of 2 cosecutive terms for its president, and maybe a third term after a break. Germanys Merkel, Britains Thatcher and Canadas Pieere Trudeau all have more than 3 terms as prime minister. Indeed, most parliamentary countries would allow their prime ministers to have more than 2 terms.
With Indians low IQ and their weird Hindu logic,You are just being stupid, for years everyone here knows I oppose Xi's third term in this forum, I also voice this oppostion on several Chinese social media platforms like many Chinese netizens do, anything bad happened to me?
Sometimes, the leader does matter. Example, if its not for Deng to came at that time, china might be in a totally different path now, different from the reform and open up policies.China doesn't have enough check and balance in her leaders' selection system, a term limit serves perfectly to compensate this weakness. It may make some very capable leaders to retire prematurely but for this whole system to work, it must be stuck to unconditionally. China has 1.4 billion people, I don't think anyone can be so good to the point of not being able to be replaced for 10 years.
I don't care about breaking two terms limit rule. Rules serve for national interest. Mongol Empire missed several critical chances to conquer Europe and Middle East because of leadership changes. The next 5 years will be most important period of time for China since 1978's Deng's reform. China will face US and its ally serious challenges in next 5 years. China probably will reunify Taiwan by force in next 5 years because it's very likely US will cross the red line soon . China will overcome economic problems at this big pandemic and recession era in next 5 years. China will make breakthroughs in semi-conductor industry. How could a rookie handle all these never seen challenges? It is more like a burden than a bonus for Xi to lead China in next 5 years.You are right on that.
Exactly, china will need strong leader to deal with the meancing US esp the coming confrontation with US over Taiwan crisis and unification undertaking in the coming 5 years. China also need a strong and transformational leader to take china into next level of development in economy, clean high technology and society. Xi is stronger, forceful and more visionary than Jiang and Hu. But, the west doesnt like what Xi is doing for china and the world, thats all the fuss and its wests problem only.I don't care about breaking two terms limit rule. Rules serve for national interest. Mongol Empire missed several critical chances to conquer Europe and Middle East because of leadership changes. The next 5 years will be most important period of time for China since 1978's Deng's reform. China will face US and its ally serious challenges in next 5 years. China probably will reunify Taiwan by force in next 5 years because it's very likely US will cross the red line soon . China will overcome economic problems at this big pandemic and recession era in next 5 years. China will make breakthroughs in semi-conductor industry. How could a rookie handle all these never seen challenges? It is more like a burden than a bonus for Xi to lead China in next 5 years.
Anti-corruption is an extremely difficult task even Deng dared not to touch it. It needs courage and moral strength to fulfil this task. Few politician around the world and through the history made the feat Xi did. Anti-corruption is not a single event. It paved way for the following years China development. You definitely have no idea how lucky China was for it was Xi, not other leader like Bo Xilai ruled China in the second decade of 21th century.Well functioning rules should not be broken. Even better leaders are not worth breaking the rules for him.
Besides his outstanding achievements in anti-corruption, I don't think Xi has any outstanding performance in other aspects.
I don't care about the so-called pressure from western countries. In fact, we all know that these pressures can't hurt us. We do not need so-called tough leaders.
We just need to continuously improve our country and do our own work well. CCP can always provide us with new and better leaders.
I have had many disagreements with you in the past.We just need to continuously improve our country and do our own work well. CCP can always provide us with new and better leaders.