What's new

The Unstoppable Epidemic Could Start in China

Yeah rite, thats why you started the swine flu pandemic

Outside Religious values, Pork have many Positive values. I must say.

Pork is a good alternative to beef, because it is lean as well as low in fat (and lower in calories). It also has a number of important nutrients such as B6, B12, thiamine, and riboflavin. Pork also contains high amounts of other nutrients such as iron, magnesium, potassium, zinc and protein. Pork also tastes good to many people. Now the question is: are there risks? Trichinosis is a possible disease that can be contracted. However, to be fair, this disease is still pretty rare in people. Also, cooking the pork very well reduces this problem.

Protein

Pork is a wonderful source of protein. A serving of 100 grams meat provides about half of the daily requirement of an adult.

Fats

- Fat content of pork depends on the part location(breast, etc.), the "weakest" meat being the one of the 6g fat content per 100g of meat;

- Pork contains more unsaturated fat than saturated fat;

- Pork contains conjugated linoleic acid, considered by experts as a good ally of the body against cancer or cardiovascular disease;

Iron

- Pork is a good source of iron for the body and is recommended to be inserted in the diet, if feriprive anemia (with iron deficiency);

- A 100-gram portion of pork provides 15% of the daily iron;

Zinc

- By consuming 100 grams of pork ensure 30% of the daily demand for zinc;

- According to studies, people who exclude meat from your diet of any type, face shortage of zinc amounts;

- Iron, zinc and vitamin D contained in red meat is better absorbed by the body, unlike other foods that contain them.

Pork is also be used in Medical Procedures
How pork and bacon could be used in medical procedures | Blog
 
.
This is why moslem don't eat pork, they are filthy animal full of nasty germ that cause deadly decceased
So, what happens when farmer Bill or Jill take a crap and forget to wash their hands before picking the greens. Nothing like a green salad with a side of diarrhea and death. :whistle:
 
.
This is somewhat true. Historically in middle east regions, pigs are raised towns with low hygiene standards (from modern perspective) and unlike sheeps, cows and chickens, pigs are way less fussy on what to eat and consume quite a lot of unsanitary things, hence why not eating pork improves health standards back in the day. The same thing does not apply to modern day though. Pigs these days are raised in much healthier environment.

There are always economic reason beyond why certain religion bans certain foods. Pigs are not grazers, as such in place where food are scarce, it becomes a competitor to human. That said, today's factor farm that raises not just pig but every livestock are not exactly sanitary environment, which is why large dose of anti-biotic are used. It's the Americans that pioneered the technique. But China today with the largest quantities of livestock has the highest chance of seeing bacteria mutate into super-resistance form. It could happen not just on pig, but any farm animal, the only factor is the size of the pool of the animal where bacteria can grow and mutate from, in that chicken could be more dangerous.
 
. .
A strong immune system cannot always overcome every baterial infections. Anti-biotic/Penicillin is still a crucial medication, our natural immune system can only fight against bateria to a certain extent. Are you telling me that a modern/affluent country can do without antibiotics? I don’t think so. Anyway, antibiotics are doomed. It’s not just China causing the problem, but its the general developing world who have contributed to this problem. The governments in developing countries don’t do a good job at regulating antibiotic usage, not informing the low IQ ignorant population about the seriousness of this issue. Third world ignorant people often buy anti-biotics over the counter for a quick fix. Its like when I opened the toxoplamosis thread warning about its rise, a bunch of low IQ ignorant cat lovers with third world mentality didn’t believe in it and asked the mod to lock the thread. Its those type of ignorant third world mentality that is causing the demise of antibiotics.


How Lethal Bacteria Evolve to Survive

Earlier this year, Dr. Neil Fishman faced a tough decision. A 54-year-old man fell off his roof while doing housework, injuring his leg. Six months later, bacteria resistant to most antibiotics had infected the wound. Fishman, associate chief medical officer for the University of Pennsylvania Health System, saw few choices: use an old, toxic antibiotic that didn’t work well and would destroy the patient’s kidneys, or amputate his leg.

“It’s scary to me that in 2014 those are the only two options to give him,” Fishman, who is also chair of the Society of Healthcare Epidemiology of America’s Education & Research Foundation, told Healthline.

The patient had his leg amputated, thus saving his life. That case is anything but isolated. Fishman has been working on antibiotic resistance since the early 1990s, and has watched along with other infectious disease as deadly bacteria have grown stronger, antibiotic use has increased, and new antibiotic discovery has fallen to an all-time low.

It has been 86 years since the first antibiotic was discovered. Experts like Fishman can cite reams of scientific evidence that show antibiotics are not as safe as they were once thought to be, and that widespread, indiscriminate antibiotic use triggers antibiotic resistance and other complications.

“They’re the only drug where administration to one patient can affect another person,” Fishman said.

An Emerging Epidemic in the 21st Century

The discovery of antibiotics made all medical procedures less risky, but they are slowly losing their effectiveness.

Bacteria are everywhere. And in most cases, that’s a good thing. Those tiny, single-celled organisms are keeping you alive by helping you digest your meals and aiding your body in fighting off infection and disease. Scientists at the National Institutes of Health are isolating and mapping the genes of all these bacteria, collectively called the human microbiome.

While humans simply can’t exist without the help of bacteria, many strains are deadly and have been the source of billions of deaths throughout history.

Humans were given a leg up when Dutch scientist Antonie van Leeuwenhoek discovered bacteria under a microscope in 1676, and one better when Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin in 1928. Those discoveries have led to the development of dozens of classes of antibiotics.

These drugs have been so crucial for so long that we’ve nearly forgotten what it’s like when common medical problems become life-or-death situations, though the signs of a reversal have been there all along.

Those who have been studying the issue, from top U.S. government infectious-disease scientists to doctors fighting to save their patients' lives, say we need to quit our old habits and get with the new science. According to the World Health Organization, we aren't far from a world where our best defenses against bacteria are rendered useless.

Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., the only microbiologist in Congress, has repeatedly and unsuccessfully tried to change the way America uses antibiotics since 2007.

“People aren’t going to be able to have their teeth fixed, or their hip replaced, if we don’t stop this. All of the new medicine, all of the new surgeries, the basis of that being successful is antibiotic use,” she told Healthline. “We’re talking about strep throat being fatal. That’s the scariest thing.”

Well, of course without anti-biotics there will be a lot of trouble, but at the same time, it also will not take us back to medieval time as you initially stated.
 
.
This is why moslem don't eat pork, they are filthy animal full of nasty germ that cause deadly decceased

This is an evolved strain of bacteria, nothing to do with pig. We should be thanking China actually!
Report from right-wing dailymail...
/health/article-3369614/

Potentially lethal superbugs that are resistant to the most powerful antibiotics have been found in Britain.

Twelve people have been treated for infections linked to virulent strains of salmonella and E.coli carrying a deadly resistance gene.

Just last month, scientists sounded the alarm over the danger of untreatable infections after the discovery of a ‘super’ version of E.coli on pig farms in China.

A similar bug was then found in Denmark. Now this same gene has been found in bugs on people, meat and farm animals in Britain.

So it was the Chinese who alerted the world of this new strain!

Its all easy for nations sitting on the fence to whine - but are you or your nation going to find the cure?
My ££ is on Britian/EU or the China..... Then we will charge you triple the price for each pill depending how nice you are!
 
.
Few days back I read somewhere that a new strain of bacteria was discovered which were a new series of antibiotics and could be the saviour against drug resistant bacteria.
 
.
Well, of course without anti-biotics there will be a lot of trouble, but at the same time, it also will not take us back to medieval time as you initially stated.

You are taking this too lightly. This is some serious stuff that will affect ALL of us.

In the next 10 years, it is all too possible for you to die and your kids writing this inscription on your grave’s headstone:

“Here lies our beloved father, who died from a paper cut. Thanks China!!! :angry:
 
. . .
You are taking this too lightly. This is some serious stuff that will affect ALL of us.

In the next 10 years, it is all too possible for you to die and your kids writing this inscription on your grave’s headstone:

“Here lies our beloved father, who died from a paper cut. Thanks China!!! :angry:

IF you have kids, i hope you have instructed them to do the same on your grave. Virus and Bacteria mutate you illiterate, it's called evolution, so don't try to shift the blame to China. Every part of the world has to deal with this problem.
 
.
The Earth needs a break and any epidemic that reduces world's human population by 90% would be great for our planet. If the remaining 10% of the population are smart the they can then build a better world. The 7 billion humans reduced to 700 million can live happily with the environment and share with the other animals.
 
.
Spread of antibiotic-resistance gene does not spell bacterial apocalypse — yet : Nature News & Comment
A ‘last resort’ drug to which bacteria are rapidly developing resistance is not quite the end of the antibiotic line.
  • Sara Reardon
  • 21 December 2015 Clarified: 21 December 2015

TREND WATCH
: Researchers have discovered that bacteria worldwide are sharing a gene that confers resistance to colistin, a 'last resort' antibiotic. Reports of the discovery originated last month from China1, and have been followed by findings of similar resistance in countries including Denmark2, the Netherlands3, France4 and Thailand5.

Although the findings are concerning, they may not be as catastrophic as many media reports have suggested, because colistin is only one of several antibiotics that are rarely used in humans. The discovery “is bad, it isn’t apocalyptic”, says Makoto Jones, an infectious-disease physician at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City.

Colistin was developed in the 1950s, one of a class of compounds called polymyxins. It is known as a last resort drug — physicians avoid using it when possible — because it tends to damage patients’ kidneys, says epidemiologist Lance Price at George Washington University in Washington DC.

As a consequence, bacteria have been slow to develop resistance to colistin, compared to other antibiotics (see 'The spread of antibiotic resistance').

24.12%20trendwatch%20WEB.png

Source: CDDEP ResistanceMap, based in part on data obtained under license from IMS MIDAS

Mutations that confer resistance to colistin had been reported previously. Many soil bacteria are also known to be resistant, because the drug is widely used in agriculture to fatten up pigs and prevent disease in farm animals. China, in particular, uses 12,000 tonnes of colistin a year in agriculture.

But the latest findings show that genes conferring resistance to colistin have been identified on loops of DNA called plasmids, which bacteria share readily with one another. Chinese researchers1 found a gene, which they called mcr-1, in Escherichia coli samples taken from multiple Chinese provinces, suggesting that it spreads easily; the same gene has now been found across Asia and Europe. Danish researchers have shown that E. coli can transfer its resistance to unrelated bacteria2.

Not quite the last resort
Colistin is not the only drug that has been called a "last resort" antibiotic. That term is often used to refer to carbapanems, which have mostly been saved to treat only infections caused by multi-drug resistant bacteria. But carbapanem-resistance plasmids have been spreading between bacteria at an alarming rate in recent years.

Still, there are other antibiotics to which wide resistance has not been seen. Clinicians could treat patients with classes of rarely used antibiotics such as tigecyclin, Jones says, or with combinations of drugs. (Like colistin, tigecyclin is toxic to patients.)

Furthermore, the power of bacteria to resist antibiotics exists on a spectrum; a larger drug dose might overcome an apparently resistant bug. Even bacteria that are resistant to colistin and other drugs are not necessarily untreatable superbugs; they may succumb to other drugs.

It is only a matter of time, however, before some kinds of infections may not be treatable with any of our current antibiotics. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved about half a dozen new antibiotics in the past two years, and about 30 more are in the pipeline. But most are similar to existing drugs and may not work any better6. The most recently discovered class of antibiotics, lipopeptides, was identified in the late 1980s.

The discovery7 in January of a new antibacterial compound, teixobactin, was met with great excitement. It is produced by soil bacteria and has a different killing mechanism from other antibiotics. But it will be years before the compound is developed into a drug and proved safe in humans, and it will not be useful against gut bacteria such as E. coli because it kills microbes that have a different type of cell wall.

Fighting overuse
To encourage companies to develop new antibiotics, some governments have created incentives such as tax breaks and faster review by regulators. Researchers are beginning to explore alternatives to the drugs, such as harnessing viruses that attack bacteria, and using antibacterial peptides found in the blood of hardy animals such as alligators.

But bacteria will inevitably become resistant to new classes of antibiotics, too. “Creating new antibiotics is all very exciting and appealing, but it’s a losing proposition if we don’t figure out how to use our existing drugs better,” says James Johnson, an infectious-disease physician at University of Minnesota in Minneapolis.

That requires cracking down on the overuse of antibiotics in farm animals and in hospitals. And a 2013 study found that about half of antibiotic prescriptions in the United States may be unnecessary8.

Governments are taking some steps: the European Union outlawed the use of antibiotics to help fatten up livestock a decade ago, and many other high-income countries, including the United States, are instituting regulations on antibiotic use. Ultimately, however — as the spread of mcr-1 shows — international cooperation to set up global surveillance and regulations will be necessary to prevent antibiotic overuse.
  • Nature doi:10.1038/nature.2015.19037
 
.
Back
Top Bottom