Kyusuibu Honbu
BANNED
- Joined
- May 21, 2010
- Messages
- 15,305
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
Not anytime soonSoon to be joined by carrier groups as well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not anytime soonSoon to be joined by carrier groups as well.
I admit I did not know about this. Any sources you can cite for referance? Thanks.You forget that Ayub Khan announced planed independence for East Pakistan as early as 1971
I admit I did not know about this. Any sources you can cite for referance? Thanks.
You don't know your Injun from your Indian, mate. The citizens of the present political state known as Indian Republic which came into existence in 1947 consider the term 'India' as copyright. To them anything and ever that was or is called India is exclusively Indian. Hell they even think Chris Hemsworth and Elsa Pataky's daughter was named 'India' because some Indian semen was used in birthing her.
http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity...explains-newborn-daughter-indias-name-2012145
Thanks mate, this is genuine discovery. Will read this and go to add as 'ammunition' to be used against our Swamp Ganga friends across the Radcliffe Line.
You don't know your Injun from your Indian, mate. The citizens of the present political state known as Indian Republic which came into existence in 1947 consider the term 'India' as copyright. To them anything and ever that was or is called India is exclusively Indian. Hell they even think Chris Hemsworth and Elsa Pataky's daughter was named 'India' because some Indian semen was used in birthing her.
http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity...explains-newborn-daughter-indias-name-2012145
Thanks mate, this is genuine discovery. Will read this and go to add as 'ammunition' to be used against our Swamp Ganga friends across the Radcliffe Line.
Not only that, they believe any history of South Asia are part of Indian history. Their kids will subconsciously believe that Indian subcontinent all belong to India.
Not anytime soon
Reminded of the rate at which USSR was building them, we then knew what happened to them.Sooner than you think dear chap. Don't forget the rate at which they are building ships
.Reminded of the rate at which USSR was building them, we then knew what happened to them.
.
USSR was a naval power and but was not known to be a shipbuilding power.
China spends less than 2% of GDP on defence. China should be spending more and can afford it.
Moreover, China is now a shipbuilding power and has the entire industrial eco-system to support it.
Reminded of the rate at which USSR was building them, we then knew what happened to them.
Building ships is one thing but designating CBG for operations in IO is another. When China does get her first CBG, they are more likely to operating close to home ground consolidating against navies such USN and JMSDF with far richer naval tradition.Sooner than you think dear chap. Don't forget the rate at which they are building ships
So what? If they put their carrier group(s) in the Indian Ocean, they aren't in the Pacific and thus are not facing the US ;-)Sooner than you think dear chap. Don't forget the rate at which they are building ships
So what? If they put their carrier group(s) in the Indian Ocean, they aren't in the Pacific and thus are not facing the US ;-)
CVN-76 Reagan, january 2017: Homeport at Yokosuka
CVN-70 Vinson, january 2017: homeport of San Diego, started Western Pacific deployment
CVN-71 Roosevelt: 3rd Fleet
CVN-68 Nimitz: at Bremerton, undergoing maintenance
CVN-74 Stennis: at Bremerton
CVN-75 Truman: at Norfolk
CVN-77 George H.W. Bush: at Norfolk, will deploy in spring
CVN-69 Eisenhower: at Norfolk
CVN-72 Lincoln: at Norfolk
CVN-73 Washington: in overhaul, at Norfolk
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/where.htm
Sooner than you think dear chap. Don't forget the rate at which they are building ships