What's new

The Story of Indian Army's "Cowardice and Panic" in 1965 By R.D. Pradhan

RiazHaq

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
6,611
Reaction score
70
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Haq's Musings: Detailed Account of Fear and Panic Gripping Indian Army in 1965 War

A full-page Indian Army advertisement published in major Hindi national dailies recently says that the Indian forces responded to the Pakistan attack with fear (darkar muqabala kiya). It was later clarified as a typographical error which changed "datkar muqabla kiya" to "darkar muqabla kiya".


An ad in a national Hindi daily saying India ‘countered the Pakistan attack with fear (darkar muqabala kiya)’
Freudian Slip?

Let's examine whether the typo was in fact a Freudian slip: An unintentional error that revealed the real truth. The best source to examine it is "1965 War: The Inside Story", an authoritative book on 1965 war written by RD Pradhan who was personal assistant to Indian Defense Minister Y.B. Chavan in 1965. Mr. Pradhan has based his book on Mr. Chavan's diaries kept during the war.

Indian Cowardice and Panic:

Mr. Pradhan has devoted an entire chapter of his book to how General Jayanto Nath Chaudhuri, the Indian Army Chief, badly panicked when Pakistani forces mounted a fierce counter-attack during 1965 war. At one point, Gen Chaudhuri ordered Gen Harbakhash Singh to pull back behind the Beas, essentially leaving much of Indian Punjab to Pakistan.

In Chapter 8 titled "Of Cowardice and Panic" of his book "1965 War-The Inside Story", R.D. Pradhan describes the cowardice of Maj. Gen. Niranjan Prasad, the Indian general commanding officer in Kasur sector. When Pakistan Defense Forces counter-attacked the intruding Indian military and the general was fired upon on Sept 6, 1965, he "ran away". Here's an excerpt:

"On learning that, Lt. Gen. Harbakash Singh and the corps commander drove in a Jonga (Nissan P60 Jeep) to the battlefront. Army commander found that the enemy (PAF) air attack had created a havoc on G.T. Road. (Indian) Vehicles were burning and several vehicles of 15 Division abandoned on the road, the drivers having run away, leaving some of the engines still running. Maj. Gen. Niranjan Prasad was hiding in a recently irrigated sugar cane field. As described by Harabakash Singh: "He (Prasad) came out to receive us, with his boots covered with wet mud. He had no head cover, nor was he wearing any badges of his rank. He had stubble on his face, not having shaved." Seeing him in such a stage, Harbakhash Singh asked him: "Whether he was the General Officer commanding a division or a coolie? Why had he removed badges of rank and not shaved? Niranjan Prasad had no answer."


Retreat to Beas:

Chapter 12 of Pradhan's book is titled "Retreat to Beas" in which there is detailed discussion of Indian COAS's proposal for the Indian Army to retreat behind Beas in the face of Pakistan's fierce counter-attacks after India's attempted incursion in Lahore. Pradhan argues in this chapter that during the 1965 war with Pakistan, Indian COAS General Chaudhuri feared that "a major battle the west of the Beas would end in the destruction of the Indian Army and thereafter allow the enemy (Pakistani) forces to push to the gates of Delhi without much resistance".




Pradhan's book contains many different entries by Indian Defense Minister Y.B. Chavan. A Sept 9, 1965 entry reads:

Had a very hard day on all fronts. Very fierce counter-attacks mounted and we are required to withdraw in Kasur area. COAS was somewhat uncertain of himself. I suggested to him that he should go in forward areas so that he will be in touch of realities. He said he would go next day.


Harbakhash Singh Memoirs:

In Line of Duty: A Soldier Remembers, according to Shekhar Gupta, the editor of Indian Express, Lt Gen Harbakhsh Singh reveals that not only "did Gen Chowdhury play a very small role in the entire campaign, he was so nervous as to be on the verge of losing half of Punjab to Pakistan, including the city of Amritsar. Harbakhsh describes, in clinical detail, how our own offensive in the Lahore sector had come unhinged. The general commanding the division on Ichchogil canal fled in panic, leaving his jeep, its wireless running and the briefcase containing sensitive documents that were then routinely read on Radio Pakistan during the war. Singh wanted to court martial him, Chowdhury let him get away with resignation".

According to Shekhar Gupta, Harbkhash Singh recounts that a bigger disaster struck a bit to the south where the other division cracked up in assault, just as it encountered a bit of resistance. Several infantry battalions, short on battle inoculation, deserted and Singh gives a hair-raising account – and confirmation of a long-debated rumor – that Chowdhury panicked so badly he ordered him to withdraw to a new defensive line behind the Beas, thereby conceding half of Punjab to Pakistan. Singh describes the conversation with Chowdhury at Ambala where he refused to carry out the order, asking his chief to either put it down in writing or visit the front and take charge of the battle.






India was the first to accept UN sponsored ceasefire (page 100 of RD Pradhan's book) on Sept 21 followed by Pakistan on Sept 22, bringing the 1965 war to an end on Sept 22, 1965. As the ceasefire took effect, Indian Defense Y.B. Chavan wrote in his diary as follows:

"The ball is now in the political court again--where it should be--and not in the military one. I hope we have the vision and courage to (our) political leadership."

Summary:

Alas, the core issue of Kashmir still remains unresolved 48 years since Mr. Chavan wrote his words of wisdom. And, unfortunately, India's Hindu Nationalist Prime MinisterNarendra Modi refuses to even talk about the Kashmir issue, much less resolve it.

Haq's Musings

What If Modi Attacks Pakistan?

India Teaching Young Students Akhand Bharat

Pakistan Army at the Gates of Delhi

India's War Myths

India-Pakistan Military Balance

Pakistan Army Capabilities

Modi's Pakistan Policy

India's Israel Envy

Can India Do a Lebanon in Pakistan?

Haq's Musings: Detailed Account of Fear and Panic Gripping Indian Army in 1965 War
 
.
As the talks have not taken place, in the coming days it will be clear as to who is a coward or not on the boarder. BTW I know about one RD Burman, never heard of a RD Pradhan!!
 
.
A pakistani trying hard ( yet again) to convince his countrymen and probably himself that pakistan might have won 1965.
Pakistan have won some battles, but all wars have gone India's way...
 
. .
A pakistani trying hard ( yet again) to convince his countrymen and probably himself that pakistan might have won 1965.
Pakistan have won some battles, but all wars have gone India's way...


As I had just posted at another thread, .... and I'll just copy paste to save me the effort..



@MBI Munshi and @RiazHaq earn their daily bread posting anything and everything negative every written, analysed, painted, portrayed, 'you get the picture' about India.

There was a time when I used to get pissed off, corner them and watch them squirm.For a while I used to sit back and get amused. Now I am plain bored.

What I have realised is, that they rave and rant because all their bile and hatred that keep piling up, has no place to go.

No we are not disintegrating as so many PDF hopefuls and think tanks have been prophesizing for ages.

Our apparently "call centre" economy is not collapsing as predicted but is growing faster than China now.

National integrity remains the strong with the majority of populace choosing nationalism over petty regionalism or casteism.

Our defence acquisitions are a major cause for heartburn in the region.


Our leadership is well, hated by the haters and loved across the planet.

I sympathize with the haters. I really do. But they to have a job to do. It's alright.

We Indians can now afford to be magnanimous. Take a pause and take a bow gents, we have come a long away indeed from 1947.
 
. .
A pakistani trying hard ( yet again) to convince his countrymen and probably himself that pakistan might have won 1965.
Pakistan have won some battles, but all wars have gone India's way...
lol that are the accounts of yr own generals and soldiers with references to their books. Go and ask them if they are wrong. Its not our fault if we quote them. BTW the historical fact is that u had accepted UN cease fire first in 21 sep and us on 22. Tells a lot who actually won and lost.
 
Last edited:
.
While one can not dispute the disarray and at times confusion mimicking cowardice on Indian side in the said sector, one can not also deny the Indian army achievements be it 3 JAT on Lahore outskirts or Battle of Asal Uttar. While one may be hard pressed to describe 1965 anywhere as an Indian victory, it is more appropriate to hail it as a Pakistani defeat as Pakistan failed to achieve its objectives. So in a sum, India may not have won the war, but Pakistan surely lost it.

lol that are the accounts of yr own generals and soldiers with references to their books. Goand ask them if they are wrong. Its not our fault if we quote them. BTW the historical fact is that u had accepted UN cease fire first in 21 sep and us on 22. Tells a lot who actually won and lost.

Friend, India did not win the war, there is no doubt about it, but Pakistan surely lost it. If you fail to achieve your political objectives, then any war is just a slugfest for the initiator. And if the defender is successful in thwarting the efforts of the initiator, then the objectives of the defender are achieved. So if you want to get into the nuances of who won and who lost, purely speaking from objective POV, you lost we won (by denying you your objectives). But in reality, man up and accept that while India did not win, you surely lost it for yourself.
 
.
I don't know what was the situation then,but there is a major rules of war on this...

It says,Never fight a battle with river on your back.

also,India flooded some areas of Punjab intentionally to bogged down Pakistani Offensive.That might be a reason too..Reforming the line is a common fact during battle.If an Army can't defend a position,they retreats to a position to face the offensive.It has nothing to do with "Cowardice"..Pakistan Army itself retreated to Lahore to counter Indian Offensive in this same war,possibly only few weeks later.


even then Pakistan was surviving on "Aids".. :rofl::rofl: That too from Australia?? :omghaha::omghaha:
 
. .
My memory serve right then, this is his third or fourth post (blog) by OP on same paragraph of R D Pradhan.
 
. .
Yeah Right.. This Picture Speaks Volumes




modi_2.jpg
 
.
lol that are the accounts of yr own generals and soldiers with references to their books. Goand ask them if they are wrong. Its not our fault if we quote them. BTW the historical fact is that u had accepted UN cease fire first in 21 sep and us on 22. Tells a lot who actually won and lost.

Does it matter that much who won and lost in 1965. Does it matter who accepted the ceasefire offer first. What was the outcome of that war?? Nothing.
 
.
Yeah Right.. This Picture Speaks Volumes




modi_2.jpg
yeah that is what u do the role of india in mukhti bani and making of bangladesh is not "dhaka chupa".attacking from back is rule of cowards not brave people
 
.
Back
Top Bottom