Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes...Philosophically speaking, there are no differences between being 'stealthy' in the EM spectrum and the same in the visible wavelengths. Both have difficulties to overcome. In radar detection, we have what is called the 'clutter rejection threshold'. The definition of 'clutter' -- junk that we do not want to process -- is quite fluid. For a meteorologist, rain drops are desirable but the aircraft passing through the rain formation is not. For an airport trying to maintain order, aircrafts are desirable in one display but weather is clutter, in another display, weather is desirable but aircrafts are not. At the baseline level, clutter includes cosmic background radiation (CBR), assorted radio and television signals, and with today's cellular phone bands, more stuff to process. So at the display level, these signals are immediately discarded.
The human brain works the same way. In any environment, we immediately process and discard what we consider to be 'ordinary'. For example: If I am in a living room, I expect to be surrounded by comfortable furniture such as a couch, a writing desk and matching chair, a TV, a radio. Somethings are so common that I expect to see the same in America or in London or in Paris. The individual items may look different but their utility features are immediately recognizable and can be quickly discarded. A 727 pilot who moved to a 777 would require some adjustment time but it would be far less than from a C-47 to a 727.
But I do not expect to see a bale of hay or an automobile engine or a nude human being. Hopefully the last item is a Playboy model. So if I am in the desert, I do not expect to see a palm tree. If I am in a lush forest, I do not expect to see an artifact like a building. Our brains processes these information so quickly and efficiently that it is both an asset and a liability.
It is an asset because we immediately focus in on out of the ordinary item from the list of 'clutter' that was already processed. Movements are major attractant in any such data processing. That is why preys and predators are often so still -- to reduce their 'attractiveness' level to any data processing that may be looking in their direction.
It is a liability in that if someone who is a predator but behave like a prey, meaning do whatever he can to reduce his 'attractiveness' level, from being still to making himself look like 'clutter', then it is very easy for us to become preys simply because we have ALREADY discarded 'clutter'.
Just like in radar detection, the goal to being 'stealthy' is being rejected from data processing from as far as possible, as soon as possible, and as long as possible. That is why sharpshooters are so feared in combat. You already rejected him the moment you look upon an environment. You have to force yourself to examine the details that you would normally ignored to see if that detail (singular) truly belong in the 'clutter rejection threshold' or not. Then you move onto the next detail (singular). And so on. How much time does that take before you can make a move, which will raise your 'attractiveness' level in return because YOU raised yourself above someone else's 'clutter rejection threshold'?
They should already be working on octocamo I mean c'mon snake already used it so you have an idea work on it.
New Recruit