are you from A-stan ?
No, Black Vigo idiot is from P-stan where in 1951, just four years after the country's formation, a group of Communists and Socialists in the military and civilian society including the poet Faiz Ahmed Faiz ( all Muslims ) attempted to take over the governance of the country. It did not succeed and its NATO-slave opponents called it the Rawalpindi Conspiracy just like how a few decades earlier in 1929 in undivided India the British colonial government had arrested some Indian and non-Indian Communists and Socialists and tried them in what they British government called Meerut Conspiracy Case. One of the arrested Communists was Shaukat Usmani, again a Muslim and one of the founders of the Communist Party of India in Tashkent in 1920. If that 1951 attempt had succeeded in Pakistan being a Communist or Socialist society our mullah Mr. Black Vigo would have been chipping the walls of the Khewra salt mine as a form of re-education. BTW Taimur Khurram, you may know that this mine was discovered by Alexander's troops in 320 BC. But to continue on, in the 1980s the Indian PM Rajiv Gandhi was ready to help mullah dictator Zia ul Haq then oppressing Pakistan to get back into power in case he was overthrown by Pakistani Communists and Socialists. Again, if that overthrow would have happened, Black Vigo boy would have been chipping the walls of Khewra mine. This I have told the idiot so many times but he being a dunderhead won't be humble, accept the reality and change his ways.
ah, the bitter you emerges yet again.. "deserves a bullet in the back of their head" eh ? .. how about someone lynch the shit out of you with your entire dirty mohalla in attendance ?
Why me ? Why not irrational right-wing criminals ? Although I don't like lynching.
We have evolved, we are not the same hunter-gatherer people from a 1000s years back
what do I have to do with Chandragupta Maurya et al ?
that sort of behaviour would generally be frowned upon in current times, and across cultures.
You are much disconnected from the world despite your self-proclaimed travels. Do you know that that foul Nupur Sharma of BJP would shut up if she was told that the famed Jhansi ki Rani, Lakshmi Bai, got married at the age of 14 ? This was not thousands of years back but just 180 years ago ? Further,
in the 1974 film Ankur which is set in Andhra the hero Surya, played by Anant Nag, is married to a young girl Saru but he cannot have sex with her until she reaches puberty which must be 13 or 14 so he is sexually frustrated and begins an affair with his Dalit maid Lakshmi. This film is set in the 1970s, just four decades ago, and showed various elements in India whether it is the bad side like oppression of peasants and Dalits or the side that has been among humans naturally for thousands of years, in this case the marriage of Surya and his sexual relations with her once she is a teen, in the natural way but what the modern bitches of POSCO would now called "under-age" and have Surya jailed. But the same bitches of POSCO will not cry for the millions of hungry Indians, for the homeless, for those killed by dog attack, for those who die of illness just because they don't have the money to pay the extortion fee that the hospital is demanding, for those farmers and students who suicide for socio-economic reasons, for the Dalit family whose two-year-old boy entered a Hindu temple and the priests there were outraged at this "lowly" achoot boy "defiling" the "holy temple" and then the priests having their defender village "elders" put a fine of 25,000 rupees on that poor family for the "defiling", then for the honor killed, for the Muslims who are going to be genocided by the viraat Hindutvadis with two million Muslims to start with at the earliest opportunity and so on and so on. These are the real concerns and crimes, not a 15-year-old girl staring lasciviously at Jamahir. The unthinking, anti-Nature bitches of POSCO are perversions and as I said must be lined up kneeling along a long ditch and have a bullet to the back of the head one by one.
He has been ghar wapsi'd already not by Indians but some commie masters of his he is an atheist who has nothing to do with Islam this is why you'll see him posing as a Muslim while rejecting hadiths, "reforming" Islam and advocating for LGBT filth and naked women at the same time
I have more to do with Islam than you do in a light year.
I have given you sources and explained you in long but simple words but you being a dolt are a stubborn irrational.
The son of chandragupta and durdhara was bindusara , comrade
And not Helena, you don't bring foreign blood in the ruling lineage
Sources, parishistah parvan for jains and mahavamsa for Buddhists.
Firstly, Helena herself was the daughter of a Greek / Macedonian father who was the ruler of Iran, and a Irani mother so your idea doesn't hold. And then 1800 years later we again have the example of the Turkic but Indianized ruler Jalaluddin Muhammad "Akbar" marrying the Hindu princess Jodha Bai. Jodha didn't question her later children who were partly of "foreign blood". Let us not employ Hindutvadi ideology to understand the variety and situations in human relationships.
Now we shouldn't care for idiotic Jain sources. We see now that the so-called humanitarian practicing Jains are aligned deeply with the anti-human Hindutvadis.
Jain accounts say other things too which will not be true :
According to the Jain accounts dated to 800 years after his death, Chandragupta abdicated his throne and became a
Jain monk, traveled away from his empire to South India and committed
sallekhana or fasting to death. Contemporary Greek evidence however avers that Chandragupta did not give up performing the rites of sacrificing animals associated with
Vedic Brahminism, an ancient form of Hinduism; he delighted in hunting and otherwise leading a life remote from the Jain practice of
Ahimsa or nonviolence towards living beings.
[6][7] Chandragupta's reign, and the Maurya Empire, set an era of economic prosperity, reforms, infrastructure expansions, and tolerance. Many religions thrived within his realms and his descendants' empire.
Buddhism,
Jainism and
Ajivika gained prominence alongside
Vedic and
Brahmanistic traditions, and minority religions such as
Zoroastrianism and the
Greek pantheon were respected. A memorial for Chandragupta Maurya exists on the
Chandragiri hill along with a seventh-century hagiographic inscription.
So about Durdhara, this is from
the Wikipedia page about her :
Durdhara was a wife of
Chandragupta Maurya, the founder of the 4th-century BCE
Maurya Empire of ancient India, according to the 12th century CE
Jain text
Parishishtaparvan by
Hemachandra.
[1] She is stated by this text to be the mother of the second Mauryan emperor,
Bindusara also known as Amitraghāta.
[2]
Nothing is mentioned or known about Durdhara outside of this legend written 1,600 years after Chandragupta's era. Other sources, such as the Burmese Buddhist records do not corroborate the Jain legend.
[1] Megasthenes, the Greek ambassador in the final years of Chandragupta's court, does not mention Durdhara nor use the name Bindusara, but refers to Chandragupta's successor as Amitrochates, while the Hindu scholar Patanjali calls him Amitraghata (meaning "vanquisher of foes").
[3][4] Scholars consider the Bindusara of Jain texts to be the same as Amitraghata.
So the Jains were lying. Bindusara had very possibly Greek blood and through him Ashoka.
Tell me one thing, for thousands of years me n were having copulation with the female and thus the offspring is born .
Marriage, regardless of religious views is basically a key to a stable life , where kids look after the old parents and the cycles has continued .
"Kids look after the old parents". Fine but that was with the understanding the parents give their kids a good society and a good life and not push them into a dog-eat-dog life first by pushing them into a irrational, unscientific and non-empathy-teaching education system where the only intention the parents have is to force their kids to get higher and higher marks in exams so that they can brag to their neighbors and relatives even if their kids suicide because of the parental and social pressure and then for those kids who didn't suicide the parents pushing the kids into a Capitalist dog-eat-dog socio-economic ecosystem where they are trapped into a life time of wage slavery, insurance, bank loans, hospital bills, water bills, house ownership installments and taxes, income tax, irrational traditional elements, zero political rights and so on. A life of misery yet the stupid parents expect their kids to do charan sparsh every morning and evening ? Such parents should be given a bullet to the back of the head.
Early Communist intellectuals put forth the idea that the family is an artificial organization and spoke for its abolition because primitive human society did not have family structure at all, with every male and female being equal in their life decisions and relationships which might be temporary and there being no political and socio-economic oppression on the children because they possibly raised communally. There was no mother to dictate to a child that if you don't bring salary of 30,000 rupees monthly and two "post-graduate" college degrees on top of you first I won't serve food to you and respect you. These Communist intellectuals considered the family to be a historic Capitalist element that was unscientific and perpetuated family-level anti-democracy and Capitalism at micro-level through unequal rights to different members of the family even though all are humans deserving equal respect and may be brilliant and contributing in their own ways and there was the possibility of low-level and big family violence and unequal distribution of family socio-economic ownership ( money, buildings, estate etc ) among the family members, and the family contributing to macro-level Capitalism through companies being handed down via dictatorial family ownership instead of the worker owning the company he or she contributed to daily that was made the company produce and be alive with of course guidance of the leaders ( Sharma, Black Vigo, read that because you daily complain to me about the North Korean Kim dynasty ), and families holding land via feudal system where the peasants tilled the land and produced crops / goods but did not have human rights including the right to obtain much of the revenue from the land they had tilled in the first place. something to be abolished. So the family was unscientific, oppressive and anti-democratic to the citizen within the family and outside. See the case of the typical Indian middle class family where the father is nothing outside the gate of his house, working in some stupid Capitalist organization like a backoffice in Bangalore for Wall Street companies and doesn't have the courage to overthrow the oppressive political, social and socio-economic system around him but once he enters the house he becomes a dictatorial person who expects to be served at his beck and call ! His actions may lead to the suicide of his children but the Indian police will not arrest him because he's the great father of the Great Indian Family System. And his parents are willing partners in his crimes.
Janjua this isn't the first time they are attacking the institution of Marriage
Mentee bhai, please read the above text about family.
Why s
Change
Now ?
Pehle to koi nai karta tha ye sab
In India are the Khajuraho temple carvings where lesbian theme is present and before the Kerala lesbians case thread was deleted I was typing out a post that included mention of a lesbian theme in Tariq Ali's Islam Quintet book series where that particular story is set in Al Andalus ( Muslim Spain of 600 years ago ).
I said elsewhere that as long as they keep it private and don't do pride marches and kiss there with saliva dripping it is fine.
No it didn't, the Punjab was on the frontier of the sub-continent and they didn't even acquire all of it, let alone the rest of India.
Yet the people set up in India by Alexander led to many Greeks / Macedonians settling here and Greek blood being part of the emperor Ashoka even.
Also, last year an episode of the quiz show Kaun Banega Crorepati hosted by Amitabh Bachchan had a question : who was the conqueror who more than 2000 years ago brought the concept of democracy to an area in what is now Himachal Pradesh in India in the Himalayan mountain region and this being among the early examples of democracy in the world ( well, at least the modern ancient world in my view ). I guessed the answer correctly. Alexander the Great who 2300 years ago brought to India the idea of Demokratia, direct democracy which was an idea implemented in Greek cities 200 years earlier where the citizens of the city could directly participate in the running of their city without a monarch or feudal being the superboss. However, this idea was not fully a democratic one because it did not include females and slaves as part of the decision-making citizens. Yet it was an advancement which is still not available now, 2300 years later in the Capitalist "free world".
Those primarily came from the Indo-Greeks, an offshoot of the Greco-Bactrians from centuries later who were heavily Dharmicised regardless, adopting Buddhist theology and customs whilst integrating with locals. They were not the same as the Macedonian or Seleucid empires, with their reign also being rather short-lived too.
OK.
Which he acquired after beating the ever living crap out of them during the Seleucid-Mauryan war.
Yes.
I don't care, that's irrelevant to everything I said.
That was in context to Alexander who I was looking at dispassionately.
I barely even mentioned him.
Jamahir, stop acting like you have an inferiority complex.
"Mera Sona Punjab defeated Alexander" was your theme, yes ?
