The real reasons Tehran is obsessed with Israel

[Solomon2]

The real reasons Tehran is obsessed with Israel

DR. MAJID RAFIZADEH
May 27, 2018

If you listen to Iranian politicians, the speeches of the Supreme Leader or Friday prayers in Iran, or study its state-controlled newspapers and other media, you will notice that hardly a day passes without the Iranian regime lashing out at Israel, which it commonly refers to as the “Little Satan.”

Some policy analysts argue this suggests two things; that Iran and Israel are natural enemies, and that the enmity is caused by the Iranian leaders’ determination to support the Palestinian people. Apologists for the regime frequently point to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s claim that Tehran’s animosity toward Israel is solely to help the “oppressed” Palestinians.

These arguments fail to reveal the strategic, geopolitical, historic and ideological reality. When the ruling clerics of Iran came to power in 1979, Iran-Israel relations shifted dramatically. Before the Iranian revolution, Israel and Tehran enjoyed close geopolitical and strategic relationships. Military cooperation was robust and included arms deals worth millions of dollars.

Iran built amicable ties with Israel for several reasons. The first was that Tehran wanted to undermine pan-Arabism. Secondly, Iran desired to appease the US by aligning itself with Washington’s staunchest regional ally, Israel. Third, Tehran sought to obtain the support of the Jewish community in the US, which was believed to be a powerful lobby group with influence in shaping US foreign policy in the Middle East. Fourth, Iran was seeking to build alliances with countries that shared common interests with Tehran in order to counter the Soviet Union’s influence in the region.

But when the mullahs seized power, Israel became a core element and a focal point of the regime’s foreign policy because the clerical establishment projected Israel as one of its critical enemies. Iran’s late Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, coined the derogatory epithet“Little Satan,” and the chant of “Death to Israel” became an integral part of the regime’s rallies.

There are several reasons for this obsession, and the regime’s colossal and unexpected policy change toward Israel.

"Threats to annihilate Israel, Holocaust denial by senior officials such as former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and hosting anti-Semitic events such the annual Holocaust Cartoon Competition are common practices within the clerical establishment, and are further examples of the regime’s anti-Semitic stance"

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh​

To begin with, the clerics did not view their power and revolution as limited to Iran’s borders. One of the vital parts of the regime’s pursuit of regional domination is expanding its influence in the Levant, which has considerable strategic importance in the region. Having a presence in the Levant ensures Iran’s access to the Mediterranean Sea and grants the mullahs a significant edge over the Arab world. Competing with, outdoing, outperforming, and dominating powerful Arab states is one of Iran’s regional aims.

To achieve such an objective, the most effective way was to create an enemy. Which enemy is better than a powerful state such as Israel? From the mullahs’ perspective, having such a strong enemy would justify Tehran’s intensive military adventurism and expansionist policies in Lebanon, Syria, and Palestine.

It would also justify Iran’s efforts to advance its nuclear and ballistic missile programs and allocate a significant part of its budget to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and its elite branch, the Quds Force, which is in charge of clandestine and extraterritorial military operations.

Secondly, projecting an obsessive hostility toward Israel paves the way for the Iranian leaders to defend establishing “resistance” groups, such as Hezbollah. In truth, these so-called resistance groups act on behalf of the Iranian regime, advancing its interest in the region, and assist Tehran in interfering in the domestic affairs of Arab nations.

Third, having Israel as an enemy helps the mullahs to repress domestic opposition. One of the charges commonly used to silence dissidents and opponents is being a “Zionist spy.” The penalty can range from long imprisonment to death.

Finally, the Islamic Republic is a revolutionary regime that sits on the bedrock of its extremist founders’ ideology. One of the core revolutionary principals of Khomeini and his gilded circle was anchored in anti-Semitism. The execution in May 1979 of Habib Elghanian, the head of the Jewish community, a businessman, and a philanthropist — after a 20-minute trial on trumped-up charges — was the regime’s first robust anti-Semitic message to Jewish communities and the rest of the world.

Threats to annihilate Israel, Holocaust denial by senior officials such as former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and hosting anti-Semitic events such the annual Holocaust Cartoon Competition are common practices within the clerical establishment, and are further examples of the regime’s anti-Semitic stance.

The mullahs’ obsession with Israel has nothing to do with defending and advancing the cause of the oppressed Palestinian people. It is for strategic and ideological reasons; to export the ruling clerics’ extremist ideology, to dominate and expand its influence in the Levant, to justify its military adventurism, and to more easily suppress domestic opposition and dissent.

• Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a Harvard-educated Iranian-American political scientist. He is a leading expert on Iran and US foreign policy, a businessman and president of the International American Council. Twitter: @Dr_Rafizadeh

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point-of-view

 

[TruthSeeker]

The deep reason Muslim world hates Zionism

Rafael Castro |Last update: 10.08.17 , 20:08

Understanding the theological implications of Zionism for Islam is crucial to realizing why peace eludes Israel. Without these implications, Israel would've probably been tolerated as a minor nuisance. Due to these implications, though, the Muslim world tends to attribute demonic ambitions to Zionism.

Cultural and political demands advanced by Berbers, Kurds and Chechens have been frustrated. Muslim claims over Mindanao and Southern Thailand have been crushed. Yet Islamic solidarity and support for the Palestinian cause dwarfs the solidarity and support provided to urgent Muslim causes elsewhere.

During the 20th century, millions of Muslims were murdered and exiled from the Balkans, the Caucasus and India. More recently, hundreds of thousands of Muslims have been persecuted and exiled from Myanmar. Muslim hatred of the nations behind these atrocities is regional. The odium stirred by smaller Zionist abuses is pan-Islamic.

Many Islamic scholars regard non-Muslim control of Muslim lands to be unjust and offensive. Yet religious sensitivity to occupation is selective: Chinese subjugation of Muslim Xinjiang, the Indian takeover of Kashmir and Russian dominance in the Caucasus are largely ignored. Jewish control of Palestine fuels religious fundamentalism and terrorism throughout the world. The claim that Jewish control over Jerusalem—the third holiest city of Islam—lies at the origin of these emotions is incorrect: Zionism was vilified long before Israel controlled any Muslim holy sites in Palestine.

Some analysts claim that aversion to Zionism reflects the strength of Islamic anti-Semitism. This theory is weak. It does not explain how Jews lived in relative peace and prosperity in Muslim lands for many centuries. If Muslims had hated Jews throughout history, it would be hard to fathom why Jews in India, for instance, built their synagogues in the heart of Muslim neighborhoods and why most Spanish Jews sought refuge in Muslim lands after 1492.

Contemporary anti-Zionism in the Muslim world reflects fears that recognition of Zionism discredits Islam. Zionism cites memories of exile to claim Jewish rights to self-determination in the Land of Israel. Jewish descent from the exiled Israelites and continuity between Israelite and Jewish religious traditions undergird this narrative.

According to Islamic tradition, the biblical Abraham, Moses, David and Solomon were Muslim prophets. The Israelites were also originally Muslim. The corollary is Islamic supersession, namely the belief that Muslims—and not Jews—are the legitimate heirs to the Israelite faith and homeland. Muslim denial that a Jewish temple existed in Jerusalem reflects Islamic beliefs that the Muslim king and prophet Suleyman built a mosque on the Temple Mount. Islamic supersession is based on the Islamic doctrine of tahrif, which teaches that Jewish and Christian scriptures distort the Islamic message delivered by the prophets of antiquity.

As fanciful as tahrif and Islamic supersession may appear to non-Muslims, these teachings are fundamental in justifying the doctrinal superiority of Islam. These teachings also shed light on the fundamental reason most Muslim states refuse to recognize Jewish ties to Jerusalem and to accept Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people.

Recognizing Israel as the Jewish homeland involves accepting the Zionist narrative. For Muslims, this means engaging with Jewish history and Jewish scriptures on historical terms—not Islamic terms. Doing so leads to recognition that Judaism predates Islam and that Islam appropriated prophetic traditions from Judaism.

For Israel, making peace with Muslim nations is a diplomatic achievement. For Muslim nations, accepting Zionism concedes the precedence of Judaism over Islam. Understanding the theological implications of Zionism for Islam is crucial to realizing why peace eludes Israel. Without these theological implications, Israel would probably be tolerated as a minor nuisance. Due to these theological implications, the Muslim world tends to attribute demonic ambitions to Zionism.

The psychological impact of Zionism is hard to overestimate. Throughout Islamic history, the fact that Jews were docile dhimmis subject to Muslim rule demonstrated the truth of supersession. Zionism subverted traditional religious hierarchies in the Middle East. By doing so, it also subverted the credibility of Islamic superiority over Judaism. The insecurity and anxiety created by this situation hardens political postures.

Despite the advantages of a peace agreement with Israel and the heavy costs of continued conflict, a survey conducted by Bernard Sabella of Bethlehem University during the Oslo peace process revealed 81 percent of Muslim Palestinians wanted Palestinian control over all of Jerusalem, including its Jewish neighborhoods. Only 33 percent of Christian Palestinians endorsed this view. These figures—even though they are not recent—suggest that Palestinian intransigence in the conflict is not motivated by a collective historical trauma or by nationalism.

As long as the religious legitimacy of Judaism is denied, the vast majority of Muslims will reject genuine peace and reconciliation with Israel.

Were the demands of Palestinian negotiators driven by national pride and memories of the tragic Nakba, Christian Palestinians who are proudly patriotic and who also experienced the Nakba would be as intransigent as their Muslim neighbors. These survey results suggest that the refusal of Hamas and the Palestinian Authority to recognize Israel as the Jewish homeland mirrors the religious anti-Zionism of a predominantly Muslim population.

It is true that Egypt and Jordan, which are predominantly Muslim countries, have signed peace agreements with Israel. Neither Egypt nor Jordan, however, ever agreed to recognize Israel as the Jewish homeland. It is probable that had Israel demanded this recognition, both Egypt and Jordan would have refused to sign peace agreements with Israel. And despite these peace agreements, both Egypt and Jordan continue to boycott Israel and imbue schoolchildren with hostility towards Israel

Ending the Israeli-Arab conflict requires Islamic recognition of the historical and spiritual significance of Israel for the Jewish people. This recognition will only be forthcoming when Muslim public opinion is exposed to pre-Islamic history, archaeology and scriptures. Islamic engagement with Jewish religious texts is fundamental for Jewish human rights to be respected in the Middle East. As long as the religious legitimacy of Judaism is denied, the vast majority of Muslims will reject genuine peace and reconciliation with Israel.

Rafael Castro (rafaelcastro78@gmail.com ) is an independent political analyst based in Berlin.

 

[Zibago]

The deep reason Muslim world hates Zionism

Rafael Castro |Last update: 10.08.17 , 20:08

Understanding the theological implications of Zionism for Islam is crucial to realizing why peace eludes Israel. Without these implications, Israel would've probably been tolerated as a minor nuisance. Due to these implications, though, the Muslim world tends to attribute demonic ambitions to Zionism.

Cultural and political demands advanced by Berbers, Kurds and Chechens have been frustrated. Muslim claims over Mindanao and Southern Thailand have been crushed. Yet Islamic solidarity and support for the Palestinian cause dwarfs the solidarity and support provided to urgent Muslim causes elsewhere.

During the 20th century, millions of Muslims were murdered and exiled from the Balkans, the Caucasus and India. More recently, hundreds of thousands of Muslims have been persecuted and exiled from Myanmar. Muslim hatred of the nations behind these atrocities is regional. The odium stirred by smaller Zionist abuses is pan-Islamic.

Many Islamic scholars regard non-Muslim control of Muslim lands to be unjust and offensive. Yet religious sensitivity to occupation is selective: Chinese subjugation of Muslim Xinjiang, the Indian takeover of Kashmir and Russian dominance in the Caucasus are largely ignored. Jewish control of Palestine fuels religious fundamentalism and terrorism throughout the world. The claim that Jewish control over Jerusalem—the third holiest city of Islam—lies at the origin of these emotions is incorrect: Zionism was vilified long before Israel controlled any Muslim holy sites in Palestine.

Some analysts claim that aversion to Zionism reflects the strength of Islamic anti-Semitism. This theory is weak. It does not explain how Jews lived in relative peace and prosperity in Muslim lands for many centuries. If Muslims had hated Jews throughout history, it would be hard to fathom why Jews in India, for instance, built their synagogues in the heart of Muslim neighborhoods and why most Spanish Jews sought refuge in Muslim lands after 1492.

Contemporary anti-Zionism in the Muslim world reflects fears that recognition of Zionism discredits Islam. Zionism cites memories of exile to claim Jewish rights to self-determination in the Land of Israel. Jewish descent from the exiled Israelites and continuity between Israelite and Jewish religious traditions undergird this narrative.

According to Islamic tradition, the biblical Abraham, Moses, David and Solomon were Muslim prophets. The Israelites were also originally Muslim. The corollary is Islamic supersession, namely the belief that Muslims—and not Jews—are the legitimate heirs to the Israelite faith and homeland. Muslim denial that a Jewish temple existed in Jerusalem reflects Islamic beliefs that the Muslim king and prophet Suleyman built a mosque on the Temple Mount. Islamic supersession is based on the Islamic doctrine of tahrif, which teaches that Jewish and Christian scriptures distort the Islamic message delivered by the prophets of antiquity.

As fanciful as tahrif and Islamic supersession may appear to non-Muslims, these teachings are fundamental in justifying the doctrinal superiority of Islam. These teachings also shed light on the fundamental reason most Muslim states refuse to recognize Jewish ties to Jerusalem and to accept Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people.

Recognizing Israel as the Jewish homeland involves accepting the Zionist narrative. For Muslims, this means engaging with Jewish history and Jewish scriptures on historical terms—not Islamic terms. Doing so leads to recognition that Judaism predates Islam and that Islam appropriated prophetic traditions from Judaism.

For Israel, making peace with Muslim nations is a diplomatic achievement. For Muslim nations, accepting Zionism concedes the precedence of Judaism over Islam. Understanding the theological implications of Zionism for Islam is crucial to realizing why peace eludes Israel. Without these theological implications, Israel would probably be tolerated as a minor nuisance. Due to these theological implications, the Muslim world tends to attribute demonic ambitions to Zionism.

The psychological impact of Zionism is hard to overestimate. Throughout Islamic history, the fact that Jews were docile dhimmis subject to Muslim rule demonstrated the truth of supersession. Zionism subverted traditional religious hierarchies in the Middle East. By doing so, it also subverted the credibility of Islamic superiority over Judaism. The insecurity and anxiety created by this situation hardens political postures.

Despite the advantages of a peace agreement with Israel and the heavy costs of continued conflict, a survey conducted by Bernard Sabella of Bethlehem University during the Oslo peace process revealed 81 percent of Muslim Palestinians wanted Palestinian control over all of Jerusalem, including its Jewish neighborhoods. Only 33 percent of Christian Palestinians endorsed this view. These figures—even though they are not recent—suggest that Palestinian intransigence in the conflict is not motivated by a collective historical trauma or by nationalism.

As long as the religious legitimacy of Judaism is denied, the vast majority of Muslims will reject genuine peace and reconciliation with Israel.

Were the demands of Palestinian negotiators driven by national pride and memories of the tragic Nakba, Christian Palestinians who are proudly patriotic and who also experienced the Nakba would be as intransigent as their Muslim neighbors. These survey results suggest that the refusal of Hamas and the Palestinian Authority to recognize Israel as the Jewish homeland mirrors the religious anti-Zionism of a predominantly Muslim population.

It is true that Egypt and Jordan, which are predominantly Muslim countries, have signed peace agreements with Israel. Neither Egypt nor Jordan, however, ever agreed to recognize Israel as the Jewish homeland. It is probable that had Israel demanded this recognition, both Egypt and Jordan would have refused to sign peace agreements with Israel. And despite these peace agreements, both Egypt and Jordan continue to boycott Israel and imbue schoolchildren with hostility towards Israel

Ending the Israeli-Arab conflict requires Islamic recognition of the historical and spiritual significance of Israel for the Jewish people. This recognition will only be forthcoming when Muslim public opinion is exposed to pre-Islamic history, archaeology and scriptures. Islamic engagement with Jewish religious texts is fundamental for Jewish human rights to be respected in the Middle East. As long as the religious legitimacy of Judaism is denied, the vast majority of Muslims will reject genuine peace and reconciliation with Israel.

Rafael Castro (rafaelcastro78@gmail.com ) is an independent political analyst based in Berlin.

The real problem from day one is the presence of European squatters imposed on this lamd by colonial powers take them back things will be solved

 

[Solomon2]

...Contemporary anti-Zionism in the Muslim world reflects fears that recognition of Zionism discredits Islam...As fanciful as tahrif and Islamic supersession may appear to non-Muslims, these teachings are fundamental in justifying the doctrinal superiority of Islam. These teachings also shed light on the fundamental reason most Muslim states refuse to recognize Jewish ties to Jerusalem and to accept Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people -

And yet...as true as this may be psychologically, there are elements in the Qu'ran at least that Israel is where Jewish possession and self-government are permitted, so there should be grounds for theological doubt here at a minimum.

The real problem from day one is the presence of European squatters imposed on this lamd by colonial powers take them back things will be solved

When maddened Muslims massacred the Jews of Hebron in 1929 the populace had been there for centuries; they were Arabized Jews, not "squatters" - your derisive term for the Jewish immigrants from Europe. Rather, egged on by the inflammatory British-appointed Mufti of Jerusalem, the growing prospect of Jewish self-rule seized these Arabs with the desire for murderous violence, targeting an utterly defenseless Jewish population: their neighbors.

 

[Zibago]

And yet...as true as this may be psychologically, there are elements in the Qu'ran at least that Israel is where Jewish possession and self-government are permitted, so there should be grounds for theological doubt here at a minimum.

When maddened Muslims massacred the Jews of Hebron in 1929 the populace had been there for centuries; they were Arabized Jews, not "squatters" - your derisive term for the Jewish immigrants from Europe. Rather, egged on by the inflammatory British-appointed Mufti of Jerusalem, the growing prospect of Jewish self-rule seized these Arabs with the desire for murderous violence, targeting an utterly defenseless Jewish population: their neighbors.

Care to give pre colonial percentage of jews in that region ?

And yet...as true as this may be psychologically, there are elements in the Qu'ran at least that Israel is where Jewish possession and self-government are permitted, so there should be grounds for theological doubt here at a minimum.

When maddened Muslims massacred the Jews of Hebron in 1929 the populace had been there for centuries; they were Arabized Jews, not "squatters" - your derisive term for the Jewish immigrants from Europe. Rather, egged on by the inflammatory British-appointed Mufti of Jerusalem, the growing prospect of Jewish self-rule seized these Arabs with the desire for murderous violence, targeting an utterly defenseless Jewish population: their neighbors.

Defenseless or occupants from Europe?

 

[Solomon2]

Care to give pre colonial percentage of jews in that region ?

Defenseless or occupants from Europe?

DYOR.

 

[Zibago]

DYOR.

Too chicken to admit the relocation under colonial rule?
https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/jerusalem-capital-settler-colony-171207100813811.html

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

iSraevil , is a country which is run by a group of racial Psychopaths
And that is the claim or Primary argument I will make

Why is it that Israevil , has not been able to have a Normal Ties with Muslim world the secret lies in simple fact
IsraEvil , is not interested in "P.e.a.c.e" their main objective is depopulation

Main Objectives for IsraEVIL
a) Depopulation of Arabs in IsraEvil
b) Demilitarization of Arab armies in some cases Turkey/Iran
c) Gradual progression of Jewish Sperm and population to make a case for expansion

Usage of Excessive force is not new on IsraEvil , as it has continued to destry Infrastructure on Palestine portions
so that it's community and Economy continues to dwindle

One aspect which has prevented a lasting trust in IsraEvil is the constant Palastine Genocide Denial by IsraEvil , and it's breastfeeding Jew fathers who has amassed wealth and stashed it in USA and Foreign banks

The Principles of Depopulation and , Destructin of Arab Farms and Economy have meant that
the numbers of Palestinians have continued to lower, and the possibility of Palestinians giving up their Land has increased exponentially over time.


Is there really depopulation ocurring in Palestine (IsraEvil) , yes of course
Palestinians families have less chances to get education , they have less chance to have Jobs due to constant destruction & Bombardment.

Historically Jews were given a Safe heaven in Muslim Lands in Past civilizations as their major beef was mainly with Christians

However it seems , the problem in Palestine is unfixable as Jews do not have desire to live in peace and instead they have a desire to spread anarchy in region

IsraEvil Neighbours

Jordan - No major airforce , no Notable Military NEUTERED
Lebnoon - No airforce , No Notable Military (60's, 70's Espinage missions) NEUTERED
Egypt - Major Military force , Airforce and Navy (PEACE DEAL FOR NOW)
Syria - Under going Demilitarization , or active War
Iraq-Syria-Turkey border Kurds NEUTERED dependent militia force
Iraq - NEUTERED
Libya - NEUTERED Military wise and Economic Wise
Turkey - Hit with Economy loses Economic Attack (Proxy War)
IRAN - Major Military force , Airforce and Navy (PEACE DEAL FOR NOW)

 

[Solomon2]

Faked photo: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...ked-photo-israeli-fighter-jet-bombing-tehran/

Map that lies: http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2012/07/debunking-map-that-lies.html

If your arguments were real you wouldn't have to use fake evidence to illustrate them, would you?

 

[500]

Why is it that Israevil , has not been able to have a Normal Ties with Muslim world the secret lies in simple fact
IsraEvil , is not interested in "P.e.a.c.e" their main objective is depopulation

LOL. Iran supports depopulation of 700,000 Muslims in Karabakh and Iran is directly responsible for biggest depopulation of Muslims in history - over 10 million Muslims in Syria.

In same time they cry about Palestine where Muslim population is rapidly growing.

One aspect which has prevented a lasting trust in IsraEvil is the constant Palastine Genocide Denial by IsraEvil , and it's breastfeeding Jew fathers who has amassed wealth and stashed it in USA and Foreign banks

Another fake lie. Here the truth:

 

[Solomon2]

However it seems , the problem in Palestine is unfixable as Jews do not have desire to live in peace and instead they have a desire to spread anarchy in region

That's what you want others to believe. Maybe you even believe it yourself. But -

"....David Wilder, a spokesperson for Hebron’s Jewish community. He grew up in New Jersey, but has lived in Israel for 35 years. He first visited during a one-year program in college and said it changed his life, so he came back after he graduated and has been there ever since.

“When we came back in 1967,” he said, “we had reasonable relations between Jews and Arabs again. There were business relationships, personal relationships. We could walk around the city unarmed and there were no problems. Things weren’t all lovey-dovey, but people got along. Things started to change in a bad way during the first Intifada in the late 1980s. The PLO began rounding up Arabs who were seen talking to Jews and accusing them of being collaborators, so pretty soon the Arabs stopped talking to us -”"

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

The jew Bankers and investors who push US into accepting every crime and genocide , can try all they want but Palestinians will get their Homeland and they will also get a Safe passge to Muslim Mosque

No respect will be granted till Palestine is Recognized and Muslims are given open access to our Mosque

 

[SALMAN F]

You obsessed with Iran

 

[Solomon2]

The jew Bankers and -

You're exposed telling repeated lies and all you do is keep digging, seeking a magic wellspring of hatred to further poison yourself and try to poison others. Heroin addict and pusher combined, yes? Prescription: cold turkey from this opiate of the masses.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Solution of Palestine is simple

2 State , and United Nation Administers the Holy City and the Cleric get rotational duties to administer the passage of people to that city Month to Month Key access (Civil) work

This demolishing of homes, Armies patroling against Palestinians and other crime of genocide will result in more conflict, this cat and mouse game of killing Civilians or people who are protestors and people who want freedom this is just not going to work

I have been given 2 pair of eyes to see how 1 group of Humans treat other group

I am sure jews need to access that area but the currenct approach of moving Embassy was provocative - the ethnic cleansing need to end , not appreciated move.

If IsraEvil loves war and loves it's technology , it is gona get a war it has never seen before


Hamas(Legitimate local movement being run by Local people)
Hisbulla (Legitimate local movement being run by Local people)
XYZ Movement (Legitimate local movement being run by Local people)


At end of day that is the only outlet for Palestinian people the sooner 2 state happen the better we will be less worried about that Barron wasteland in Israevil


FAIR DEAL:

• iSRAEL is recognized for certain lands
• Palestine is recognized for cetrain land no more air bombing and tanks

No one country owns Jerusalam it becomes under UN watch
Jerusalam -> Administered by United Nation Police / Appointed Clerics


Simple Solution ~

Stop wasting every human on planet's time thank you