The picture that shames Britain

[Abingdonboy]

There just are no words.....

The busy scene on the banks of the lake appears to show our emergency services at their dynamic best.
An air ambulance stands by as two specialist officers in yellow ‘immersion suits’ deliver a man who has collapsed into the water to paramedics at the water’s edge.
They attempt to resuscitate him inside an inflatable tent. A queue of ambulances and fire engines stands by ready and waiting near a small crowd of shocked onlookers. Yet the story behind this picture is anything but impressive.

Walpole Park 12.52pm: The massive operation to haul Mr Burgess from the lake - 37 minutes after he was first spotted
This was Walpole Park in Gosport, Hampshire, on an overcast lunchtime last March when no fewer than 25 members of the emergency services, including a press officer, descended on a 3½ft-deep model boating lake minutes after Simon Burgess, 41, fell into the water when he suffered a seizure. But as an inquest heard last week, he lay floating face-down for more than half an hour while firemen, police and paramedics watched and did nothing.
The reason? Even though they could all swim, the first fire crew to arrive hadn’t been ‘trained’ to enter water higher than ankle-deep. Instead they waited for ‘specialists’ to arrive to retrieve his body. They had decided Mr Burgess must surely be dead because he had been in the water for ten minutes. When a policeman decided to go in anyway, he was ordered not to. A paramedic was also told not to enter the water because he didn’t have the right ‘protective’ clothing and might be in breach of the Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992.
The tragic incident made headlines around the world, held up as a shocking example of ludicrously risk-averse Britain. And it prompted a coroner to demand that fire, police and ambulance services improve training to prevent a repeat.
Following the inquest, a Mail on Sunday investigation has now discovered that:
The ‘ankle-deep’ rule was meant for fast-flowing water and is taken from guidelines drawn up to deal with floods.
Other rescue agencies believe people can survive submerged for much longer than ten minutes – some will still try resuscitation at 90 minutes.
The incident happened despite a previous reassurance from the Health and Safety Executive that firefighters would not face prosecution if they performed acts of heroism that break rules.
Mr Burgess could have been reached within two minutes of emergency crews arriving at the scene – as proved by our reporter who went into the lake and waded 25ft to the spot where his body had been floating.
Mr Burgess had been feeding swans from a plastic bag that blew into the lake. He went in to retrieve it and while he was in the water he had a fit and fell unconscious. Last week, Coroner David Horsley ruled his death was an accident on the balance of probabilities, but said there was a chance, ‘albeit a slim one’, he could have been saved had the emergency services intervened sooner.
Fire station watch manager Tony Nicholls arrived at the scene within five minutes but refused to try to rescue Mr Burgess because, he told the inquest, his crew’s ‘Level 1’ training only allowed them to go in the water up to their ankles.
Hampshire Fire and Rescue said all its firefighters were trained to Level 1, which includes ‘general water safety awareness and basic land-based rescue techniques’. To comply with the guidelines, they had to wait for a specialist water rescue team to arrive. Mr Nicholls said these officers were ‘Level 2-trained’, meaning they could ‘go in chest- high’. Only those who had completed the Level 3 course would be allowed to swim, however.
Although it wasn’t made clear at the inquest, the rule about not entering water more than ankle-high is based entirely on guidelines drawn up by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs for tackling flood emergencies.
A Hampshire Fire and Rescue spokesman admitted the service knew the guideline was originally intended as advice to be followed at flood incidents – but the service insists firefighters apply it in ALL water-related incidents.


A Defra spokeswoman explained: ‘Our guidance is only ever to be used by the emergency services in response to a flood. This is because floods by their very nature are highly unpredictable, unlike existing bodies of water. Our guidance should never be used in any other instance.’
However, the Government’s Chief Fire and Rescue Adviser, Sir Ken Knight, has included the Defra training recommendations in an ‘operational guidance’ document on water safety.
One of the police officers at the scene, PC Tony Jones, told the inquest that he volunteered to go in, but was ‘strongly advised’ not to by Mr Nicholls. The PC also told the inquest that Mr Nicholls refused to let him borrow his lifejacket.
Then PC Jones was told by his control room that ‘under no circumstances’ should he attempt a rescue. Asked to explain that decision, Hampshire Police said yesterday: ‘The fire service were already there and they were recovering a body.’ The decision to downgrade the incident from a rescue to a ‘body retrieval situation’ reflected the confusion over submersion victims.
The Royal National Lifeboat Institution said the only instances in which its rescuers would not attempt resuscitation would be if a body was already decomposing, or had been submerged for more than 90 minutes. Rescuers in the US believe a person can be revived after being immersed in water for up to an hour.
Professor Mike Tipton, of Ports–mouth University, concluded in a report for the emergency services last year that if ‘water temperature is warmer than 6C [42F], survival is extremely unlikely if submerged longer than 30 minutes’.
Chances of survival are much higher if water temperature is lower than this, but not if the body is submerged for more than 90 minutes.
He produced examples of people who had been saved after submersion of between 20 and 60 minutes.
Despite the safety rules, those at the scene could have entered the water under Health and Safety Executive guidelines that exempt 999 workers from prosecution if they perform acts of heroism. This follows Lord Young’s report, Common Sense, Common Safety, which called for an end to ‘senseless’ rules and regulations.
Last night, Fire Minister Bob Neill said: ‘Health and safety rules should be there to save lives, not put them at risk.’ He added that the Government would review existing guidance and take into account lessons learnt from recent incidents.

Treading carefully, it would have taken rescuers less than two minutes to reach Simon Burgess as he floated face-down in Gosport’s Walpole Park pond.
I know this because I put on a pair of waders and made my way across the 25ft of water that fire officers decreed was too dangerous for their crew, given that Mr Burgess was showing ‘no visible signs of life’.
Based on information given by the main independent witness, Gillian Hughes, I went into the former boating lake and made my way out to the spot where Mr Burgess had been floating.

'No danger': Reporter Nick negotiates the lake
Because this was a simple reconstruction rather than an emergency, I had time to don anglers’ waders and boots. I used a pole to prod the lake floor ahead of me.
Easing myself into the half-moon-shaped lake, the water immediately rose thigh-high.
I could feel the bottom was covered in thick sludge but beneath lay a hard, even base that was straightforward to negotiate. At no point did the depth rise higher than 3½ft, and at no point did I feel as if I was in the remotest danger.
Mrs Hughes, a 53-year-old catering assistant, had been walking beside the lake with her two-year-old grandson as the tragedy unfolded in March last year.
Like Mr Burgess, they had been feeding the swans. She watched him trying to reach a plastic bag that had blown into the water, then saw him step in fully clothed and start swimming.
He appeared to be smiling but in fact, the inquest heard, epileptic Mr Burgess was probably having a seizure. He soon stopped moving.
Mrs Hughes dialled 999 and watched the Gosport fire crew arrive. But as they waited on the bank, showing little sign of activity, her frustration boiled over.
‘I just could not believe how everybody stood around doing nothing,’ she told me. ‘I said, “Quick, go in and get him. He might be all right.”
‘One of them said, “We’re not allowed.”
‘After the body was recovered and I was brought over to give a statement to police, another fireman came over and said, “We’re not allowed to go in more than ankle-deep.”
‘I asked why. He replied, “Health and safety.” I’ve never heard of anything so stupid in my life.’
Our reconstruction shows that Mr Burgess could have been reached by firemen – who took five minutes to reach the scene – within seven minutes of
Mrs Hughes’s 999 call, rather than the 37 minutes that it eventually took.
As I stepped out of the water, members of the Gosport Model Yacht Club, who use an adjoining pond, stopped to talk about the tragedy. One said: ‘We often wade in to free up yachts that get stuck. Why couldn’t firemen do the same for a dying man?’

The picture that shames Britain: As a man's body floats in three and a half feet of water, 25 999 workers stand and watch because they aren't 'trained' to go in water | Mail Online

 

[Mech]

Unbelievable stuff right here.

 

[rcrmj]

lol, this is too much 'proffesionism'

 

[Lone Shooter]

Amazingly horrifying.

But I am sure that this incident will not go down the drain and some sense will prevail for the training of future rescuers.

 

[boris]

When I read "chest deep" I read about 10 times to make sure it was correct.Seems the Metropolitan Police and Emergency services are filled with madcaps.

 

[Asian.Century]

terrible pak govt and Briti govt.

UK sends 7 chartered flights of ‘illegal’ immigrants to Pakistan

By Asif Mehmood

LONDON: The ongoing mass deportation of illegal Pakistani immigrants from the UK has cost some of these immigrants their lives despite the British government being forewarned about this eventuality. Many of them could have been tortured on their return.

At least seven chartered flights have been sent to Pakistan carrying 350 to 400 of Pakistanis whose pleas to remain in the UK have been refused.

The UK Border Agency (UKBA) refuses to discuss such flights until they landed. These deportees are over and above those repatriated regularly under the MoU on managed migration between the two countries. Under the MoU, the maximum of 120 persons can be deported per month.

The British Home Office says it only removes people who face no risk of torture, but Freedom From Torture Freedom and Human Rights Watch both argue that the government has severely underestimated this possibility when it comes to returned Pakistanis, many of them have been routinely arrested by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA).

The Association of Pakistani Lawyers (APL), a team of Pakistani origin lawyers in the UK, has expressed concerns over the chartered flights of deportees and swift “travel documents” to facilitate deportations.

Talking to Daily Times, APL Chairman Barrister Amjad Malik expressed his reservations on MoU between both the countries and demanded that the said arrangements and “enforced repatriation” must be made public.

“Interior Minister Rehman Malik must impress his British counterpart for regularisation of those immigrants, especially students who are affected due to sudden closure of their colleges to compensatory regularise them rather than their arrests, detention, repatriation, and threats of prosecution via chartered flight,” he added.

Barrister Malik feared that such “foggy” arrangements and “shady” deals may promote illegal actions and torture and Pakistan may directly or indirectly use torture to extract information on behalf of third parties, as has allegedly happened in the case of British permanent resident Bin Yam Mohammad and Rangzeb Ahmed over which courts have criticised Pakistani government, and intelligence agencies.

The Pakistan High Commission in London did not respond to a request for comment.

Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan

 

[Roll in deep]

So sad........