The pain of partition

[PAKBARBIE]

Those people who relatives in India are mostly muhajirs, they should have never moved to pak as its not their ancestral land, they belong in bihar and other jungles, and since they have relatives they should move to India As this land is our ancestral land soon to be pakafghania.

r u effin stupid. muhajirs r the most educated and made the most sacrifices for our nation. they brought language and culture that is associated with pakistan today. for ur info the founder of pak lived in bombay. and there wud be no pakistan if it werent for him and others from present-day india .

 

[Jackdaws]

r u effin stupid. muhajirs r the most educated and made the most sacrifices for our nation. they brought language and culture that is associated with pakistan today. for ur info the founder of pak lived in bombay. and there wud be no pakistan if it werent for him and others from present-day india .

Then why have a specific name for them - mujahirs? We don't have any such name for the Hindus/Sikhs who came to India.

 

[mb444]

Dude Bangladesh may have come into existence in its current form in 1971. but a sovereign Muslim presence has existed for just over 1000 years . In terms of a true legal entity what is Bangladesh was part of the Delhi sultanate which itself was constituent part of the islamic empire.

Speaking as a Bangladeshi and Muslim I am unaware of this historical India you people speak of. As someone said what does a bangali have in common with a punjabi. Well nothing other than Religion. I suppose Hinduism perhaps links theology with land as such you guys have a vision of a India that supersedes the identities of the individual nations of the subcontinent. Pre Islamic empires of the subcontinent were large but none united what is India now under one central rule. Moghuls united all differing parts in one.

 

[notsuperstitious]

there is no logic in this statement.

Ask All INDIA Muslim League leader Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

 

[Hindustani]

Dude Bangladesh may have come into existence in its current form in 1971. but a sovereign Muslim presence has existed for just over 1000 years . In terms of a true legal entity what is Bangladesh was part of the Delhi sultanate which itself was constituent part of the islamic empire.

Speaking as a Bangladeshi and Muslim I am unaware of this historical India you people speak of. As someone said what does a bangali have in common with a punjabi. Well nothing other than Religion. I suppose Hinduism perhaps links theology with land as such you guys have a vision of a India that supersedes the identities of the individual nations of the subcontinent. Pre Islamic empires of the subcontinent were large but none united what is India now under one central rule. Moghuls united all differing parts in one.

Mauryan Empire, Kushan Empire, Gupta Empire, Devapala Empire... etc. The Mughals never ruled all of India. Such as modern day Assam, Kerala and parts of Tamil Nadu

 

[Jackdaws]

Mauryan Empire, Kushan Empire, Gupta Empire, Devapala Empire... etc. The Mughals never ruled all of India. Such as modern day Assam, Kerala and parts of Tamil Nadu

Or Rajasthan or the Maratha region....

 

[mb444]

I am no historian but apart from the very south of India I always understood the moghul empire held sway over almost all of India. Obvious as it decayed bits of broke off and rebelled just like the sultans of Bengal for example. I just did a cursory search and the following map came up.

moghul empire at its height - Google Search

 

[Jackdaws]

I am no historian but apart from the very south of India I always understood the moghul empire held sway over almost all of India. Obvious as it decayed bits of broke off and rebelled just like the sultans of Bengal for example. I just did a cursory search and the following map came up.

moghul empire at its height - Google Search

"At its height" will present a skewed picture. Here is the Maratha Empire at its height in the same era -

https://www.google.co.in/search?q=m...sugexp=chrome,mod=19&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

 

[mb444]

"At its height" will present a skewed picture. Here is the Maratha Empire at its height in the same era -

https://www.google.co.in/search?q=m...sugexp=chrome,mod=19&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

What??? Marathas rebelled and as moghuls fell they rose. Not sure what point you are making. Moghuls controlled most of the sub continent in their time. The transfer of power went from moghuls to the British. Others are mere side note of history.

But the only actual point I was making was that Hindu view of India transends nation, jurisdiction and cultural states of the subcontinent

 

[S_O_C_O_M]

r u effin stupid. muhajirs r the most educated and made the most sacrifices for our nation. they brought language and culture that is associated with pakistan today. for ur info the founder of pak lived in bombay. and there wud be no pakistan if it werent for him and others from present-day india .

What you posted is very biased with complete disregard for the rest of Pakistani community. And many may find it insulting.

 

[miss]

With due respect I dun agree with this..with current hindu population of 80 million and combined muslim population of bangladesh,pakistan and indian muslims of arnd 50 million it was no problem for muslims to rule subcontinent for ages again like they did before britshers owing to coward nature of vegetarian hindus as compare to meat eating brave muslims..Muslims ruled subcontinent would have been a superpower given the combined resources of subcontinent.Lots of resources were wasted to mutual distrust and wars induced by US and EU arm sellers.
Hindus claimed to be living in this area for thousand of years and relatively new muslims ruled them for over a thousand years ,ruling them again wouldnt have been a issue at all...

how can you rule if we dont vote for you?

 

[Ticker]

Those people who relatives in India are mostly muhajirs, they should have never moved to pak as its not their ancestral land, they belong in bihar and other jungles, and since they have relatives they should move to India As this land is our ancestral land soon to be pakafghania.

There could have been a better word used than calling ones self a Muhajir, 65 years after Pakistan's creation. An alternative word to identify the community is in order.

 

[Ticker]

Mauryan Empire, Kushan Empire, Gupta Empire, Devapala Empire... etc. The Mughals never ruled all of India. Such as modern day Assam, Kerala and parts of Tamil Nadu
Original Post By Hindustani
Or Rajasthan or the Maratha region....

Yeh kaafi nahin hai kya .......

 

[skydrill_2]

mughals are indians......

ryt??..........

 

[Desert Fox]

True. They were ruled by Hindus, then my Arabs/Afghans, then by Sikhs, then by the British and now by the Americans. The area which currently forms Pakistan has never enjoyed any real freedom.

Good, then don't claim the Indus Valley Civilization or Ghandara either since that too was/is in modern day Pakistan.