What's new

The only South Asians to defeat the Greeks-Mauryas

Status
Not open for further replies.

JaiMaurya

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
Seleucus I Nicator's invasion of India (c.306-303 BC) was one of a series of obscure campaigns fought by Seleucus in an attempt to gain control of the eastern part of his recently regained kingdom.

Seleucus was appointed Satrap of Babylon in 321 BC, and retained more of an eastern outlook that most of Alexander successors, remaining married to his Iranian wife. In 315 BC Seleucus was expelled from Babylon by Antigonius, and was forced to flee to Ptolemy in Egypt. Three years later Ptolmey defeated Antigonus's son Demetrius at Gaza, and Seleucus took the chance to return to Babylon, where he regained power. Antigonus attempted to expel him for a second time, but was defeated in a battle somewhere near Babylon.

In theory Seleucus now had control over the eastern part of the old Persian empire, stretching out to the Indus River, but in reality large parts of that empire had slipped out of Macedonian control during the civil wars. A new empire had risen in India, where Chandragupta Maurya had seized control of Magadha at about the time of Alexander's death, and now controlled most of northern India as far as the Indus.

The events of the war between Seleucus and Chandragupta are obscure. Seleucus crossed the Indus, and may have advanced towards the Ganges. If there were any major battles Chandragupta must have won them, for when the war ended (possibly in 303 BC) the peace was greatly to his advantage. Seleucus abandoned any claims east of the Indus and also transferred the satrapies of the Parapanisadai (around Kabul), Aria (around Heart) and Arachosia (around Kandahar) and possible eastern Gedrosia to Chandragupta. In return he was given 500 war elephants. The treaty was to be ratified by a marriage alliance between the two men.

Seleucus made good use of his elephants, taking them 2,500 miles west to Ipsus, where they played a major part in the defeat and death of Antigonus, a victory that gave Seleucus access to the Mediterranean coast. In India Chandragupta's victory enhanced the strength of the Mauryan Empire, the first in Indian history.
 
.
err. why do you think alexander turned back at beas? afraid of bhaiyas? :lol:

Raja Porus kicked that midget out of Punjab. we didn't let him meet his darker midget brethren in ganga. how sad :cry:
 
.
err. why do you think alexander turned back at beas? afraid of bhaiyas? :lol:

Raja Porus kicked that midget out of Punjab. we didn't let him meet his darker midget brethren in ganga. how sad :cry:

Dear lord why do most people think that Porus defeated Alexander at the battle of hydaspes???
 
.
err. why do you think alexander turned back at beas? afraid of bhaiyas? :lol:

Raja Porus kicked that midget out of Punjab. we didn't let him meet his darker midget brethren in ganga. how sad :cry:
If Porus defeated Alexander then why did Seculus occupy Pakistan after his death?
 
.
Seleucus I Nicator's invasion of India (c.306-303 BC) was one of a series of obscure campaigns fought by Seleucus in an attempt to gain control of the eastern part of his recently regained kingdom.

Seleucus was appointed Satrap of Babylon in 321 BC, and retained more of an eastern outlook that most of Alexander successors, remaining married to his Iranian wife. In 315 BC Seleucus was expelled from Babylon by Antigonius, and was forced to flee to Ptolemy in Egypt. Three years later Ptolmey defeated Antigonus's son Demetrius at Gaza, and Seleucus took the chance to return to Babylon, where he regained power. Antigonus attempted to expel him for a second time, but was defeated in a battle somewhere near Babylon.

In theory Seleucus now had control over the eastern part of the old Persian empire, stretching out to the Indus River, but in reality large parts of that empire had slipped out of Macedonian control during the civil wars. A new empire had risen in India, where Chandragupta Maurya had seized control of Magadha at about the time of Alexander's death, and now controlled most of northern India as far as the Indus.

The events of the war between Seleucus and Chandragupta are obscure. Seleucus crossed the Indus, and may have advanced towards the Ganges. If there were any major battles Chandragupta must have won them, for when the war ended (possibly in 303 BC) the peace was greatly to his advantage. Seleucus abandoned any claims east of the Indus and also transferred the satrapies of the Parapanisadai (around Kabul), Aria (around Heart) and Arachosia (around Kandahar) and possible eastern Gedrosia to Chandragupta. In return he was given 500 war elephants. The treaty was to be ratified by a marriage alliance between the two men.

Seleucus made good use of his elephants, taking them 2,500 miles west to Ipsus, where they played a major part in the defeat and death of Antigonus, a victory that gave Seleucus access to the Mediterranean coast. In India Chandragupta's victory enhanced the strength of the Mauryan Empire, the first in Indian history.
That because chadragupta United almost all parts of India into single empire.He have an army of 6 lacs which huge.secondly Chandra Gupta was vetran in gorilla war.he himself defeated formidable Nanda empire with few outlaw army.Thirdy he have Kautilya as his advisor So you can say odds are in the Favour of Chandragupta.
 
Last edited:
.
Dear lord why do most people think that Porus defeated Alexander at the battle of hydaspes???
Its Because of the Alexander movie i think they don't take ashokan inscriptions as true facts but Hollywood movie:D:D:D:D
 
. .
If Porus defeated Alexander then why did Seculus occupy Pakistan after his death?

selucus nicator's realm was mainly afghanistan/then ancient bactria, beyond that his control or extent of border is not concretely known. porus' 'defeat' is only mentioned in greek texts and later western accounts based on the same. just face saving for the mighty midget's reputation, otherwise alexander wouldn't be alexander would he? eastern accounts outside subcontinent like ferdowsi confirm alexander was defeated by Porus.
 
.
selucus nicator's realm was mainly afghanistan/then ancient bactria, beyond that his control or extent of border is not concretely known. porus' 'defeat' is only mentioned in greek texts and later western accounts based on the same. just face saving for the mighty midget's reputation, otherwise alexander wouldn't be alexander would he? eastern accounts outside subcontinent like ferdowsi confirm alexander was defeated by Porus.
It's well established fact the Seleucid Empire stretched into Pakistan and this fact is also established by the edicts of Ashoka. Unless you can show me a source which proves that the Seleucid empire didn't rule Pakistan then I will leave you with this:
"He (Seleucus) crossed the Indus and waged war with Sandrocottus [Maurya], king of the Indians, who dwelt on the banks of that stream, until they came to an understanding with each other and contracted a marriage relationship."

— Appian, History of Rome, The Syrian Wars 55
 
.
It's well established fact the Seleucid Empire stretched into Pakistan and this fact is also established by the edicts of Ashoka. Unless you can show me a source which proves that the Seleucid empire didn't rule Pakistan then I will leave you with this:
"He (Seleucus) crossed the Indus and waged war with Sandrocottus [Maurya], king of the Indians, who dwelt on the banks of that stream, until they came to an understanding with each other and contracted a marriage relationship."

— Appian, History of Rome, The Syrian Wars 55

bactria in those times included khyber region and suleiman mountains, which was mostly inhabited by khatri tribes and others similar to hindkowans of today. at any rate, what this have to do with proving alexander's victory? Porus controlled his own kingdom when alexander was on his deathbed- Fact. does ashoka or any other's writings validate the greek version of events? no, in fact eastern sources and tradition says the opposite.
 
.
err. why do you think alexander turned back at beas? afraid of bhaiyas? :lol:

Raja Porus kicked that midget out of Punjab. we didn't let him meet his darker midget brethren in ganga. how sad :cry:

He was afraid of Nands'a army aka Bhaiyas :lol:
 
. .
bactria in those times included khyber region and suleiman mountains, which was mostly inhabited by khatri tribes and others similar to hindkowans of today. at any rate, what this have to do with proving alexander's victory? Porus controlled his own kingdom when alexander was on his deathbed- Fact. does ashoka or any other's writings validate the greek version of events? no, in fact eastern sources and tradition says the opposite.

That is because Alexander made him his satrap. When Seleucus marched across the Indus he clashed with Chandragupta Maurya who gave him a bloody nose.

err. why do you think alexander turned back at beas? afraid of bhaiyas? :lol:

Raja Porus kicked that midget out of Punjab. we didn't let him meet his darker midget brethren in ganga. how sad :cry:

Apparently it was a Bihari bhaiya Chandragupta Maurya who freed your tall and handsome people from the Greeks and ruled over you ;)
 
. .
bactria in those times included khyber region and suleiman mountains, which was mostly inhabited by khatri tribes and others similar to hindkowans of today. at any rate, what this have to do with proving alexander's victory? Porus controlled his own kingdom when alexander was on his deathbed- Fact. does ashoka or any other's writings validate the greek version of events? no, in fact eastern sources and tradition says the opposite.
He was booned By Alexander after the war due to his commanding skills of a warrior and secondly for the famous lines he has spoken to Alexander when he asked Porus what should he do with him Porus said " Treat me like one king treats another king after loosing a war" Alexander was once again impressed.alexander give porus his kingdom back and made him his ally.after the battle alexander army was devasted they don't have courage to go more deeply in alein territory where Nanda army is waiting for him which has forces of more than 5 lacs in numbers including 5000 elephants.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom