What's new

The Myth Of The Cruel Mongol

. .
inferior hindus of India sliding to new lows! gj modi the conqueror!
 
.
Her Jawhar is part of the history of Rajputs, the clan of Ratan singh.


She chose a dynamic conqueror over a pathetic loser.... she was burnt alive for the crime...

Put your self in her place... what would you choose??
 
.
She chose a dynamic conqueror over a pathetic loser.... she was burnt alive for the crime...

Put your self in her place... what would you choose??

Chhota tinda chaddi Vs great Alauddin Khilji.. most of his kind will chose khilji for their sisters.. :lol:
 
.
History was written by the people who killed Padmawati.. lolll

Nope, it was also written by the survivors of the war.

That whole story is disputed.

Which only means there are two versions as with any historic account.

She chose a dynamic conqueror over a pathetic loser.... she was burnt alive for the crime...

Put your self in her place... what would you choose??

She is a hero cause most Hindus men and women admired her courage. So the answer is pretty obvious.

Today, she would have picked up the gun and fought kilji.
 
. .
:lol:

The fact that this is even being discussed shows the sheer bigotry Hindustanis have towards Muslims.

Khiliji saved your hide and gave many people of the region great job opportunities so they could feed their family. Cities like Delhi prospered under his rule, and he settled down within Hindustan and made it his home, rather than looting it.

The Mongols would have literally wiped out most of the population. Remember what they did to Iran or Iraq? The Mongols literally wiped out 11% of the world population at the time. That would be like someone in modern times wiping out all of Europe.

Not to mention the amount of rape that took place, it's been rigourously documented that the Mongols loved to rape those they conquered and the results are seen today, with 1/200 people today being descended from Ghenghis Khan alone (and that's just the ones who haven't had the genes diluted over time), so imagine how many people have at least some Mongol admixture in general from his empires mass rape sprees.

The Mongols were without a doubt the most barbaric savages to ever exist, anyone who says otherwise is a liar. There's a reason we to this day call anyone who is a savage a Mongoloid.

what makes you think Mongols could survive monsoons, tropical disease, mosquitoes etc ?
 
. . .
LOL.

You got 0.0001% taste of Mongols when the fake Mongol wannabe Tamerlane invaded Delhi.

Wikipedia said:
After three days of citizens uprising within Delhi, it was said that the city reeked of the decomposing bodies of its citizens with their heads being erected like structures and the bodies left as food for the birds by Timur's soldiers. Timur's invasion and destruction of Delhi continued the chaos that was still consuming India, and the city would not be able to recover from the great loss it suffered for almost a century.

Erect a statue of Khilji and worship it. He did more for you than any Hindu God or King.
@Suriya
 
.
1. khilji faught mongols in today's pakistani punjab . So if anything he saved ur hide .

2. When Mongols had captured north west punjab , they didn't wiped off the population or rape/killed them , not even your historian alleges anything as such on Mongols who invaded today's pakistani part of punjab .

3. Barbarian Khilji rule was well documented ,


probably in Pakistan too .






i can feel pity for those who suffers from stockholm syndrome , LOL

1. Do you think they would have stopped in Punjab? Of course not, they would have raped and looted you guys too. Also, I'm not the one bad-mouthing Khiliji here, I appreciate him for his efforts and consider him a hero as he projected Muslim rule further into Hindustan.

2. They didn't treat us as bad as other places they conquered, but they weren't exactly good either.

3. Cry all you want, the Mongols were much worse and your rulers have done some pretty nasty stuff too. Also, it is the job of the Muslim to obey the Muslim ruler. If some idiots in Sindh went against that rule, then I fully support Khiliji in uniting the Muslims of the area under one banner, even if he had to do so by force. Islam comes first, then nationality/ethnicity. Also, I'm not Sindhi.

What's your obsessions with this stockholm syndrome thing? It isn't stockholm syndrome if we are Muslim and our ancestors fought under these Muslim Empires or migrated to the area with them.

Also, Malik Kafur was not just a Hindustani, but also a Hindu lol.

As said earlier, if the Mongols were so great, why did one of them (Tamerlane) leave you guys so upset that nobody can even name their child Taimur without you screaming like a bunch of dumb monkeys.
 
Last edited:
.
Because everyone else could.

Look where Mongols went - it was either dry parts of the world or cold temperate regions of the world
British could not handle the tropics - they are little more resourceful than the Mongols
 
.
Look where Mongols went - it was either dry parts of the world or cold temperate regions of the world
British could not handle the tropics - they are little more resourceful than the Mongols

The British still conquered and subjugated the place.

Anyway, we already saw what the Mongols could do under Tamerlane. This hypothetical scenario is worthless, it already happened.
 
.
As said earlier, if the Mongols were so great, why did one of them (Tamerlane) leave you guys so upset that nobody can even name their child Taimur without you screaming like a bunch of dumb monkeys.
1.
Timur was Turco-Mongol basically what was later known as Mughals and a muslim rather than Buddhist Mongol of Genghis Khan vintage.

2. Whatever murder ,rape and pillage of Hindus he did in delhi , by his own account done as a religiously duty ordained to punish idol worshiping hindus .

3. Buddhist mongols Khilji faced would never hurt hindus out of sheer religious hatred the way muslim invaders often justified massacres of Hindus and destruction hindu temples for Hindus simply being kafirs .
 
.
Back
Top Bottom