THE "MOON"...Ah, the moon!!!

[Cookie Monster]

Exactly. While we all are entitled to opinions, national interests do not go by personal concepts such as these. Children are dying of starvation in Thar, but Pakistan must do whatever serves its national interests given whatever resources and abilities it can muster, just like the attempted Indian moon landing. There is no difference here.

Lol what? So this entire time u thought I was speaking for the state of India? Or for the state of Pakistan? Was it not obvious to u that I was stating my opinion? Plz tell me I didn't just waste my time with this whole argument just bcuz u didn't know that I was stating my opinion.

 

[VCheng]

Lol what? So this entire time u thought I was speaking for the state of India? Or for the state of Pakistan? Was it not obvious to u that I was stating my opinion? Plz tell me I didn't just waste my time with this whole argument just bcuz u didn't know that I was stating my opinion.

And as I have said all along, nations in pursuit of their sovereign interests do not go by personal concepts, whether it be space exploration, nuclear weapons or border security. There is no difference between any of them in this regard.

 

[Cookie Monster]

And as I have said all along, nations in pursuit of their sovereign interests do not go by personal concepts, whether it be space exploration, nuclear weapons or border security. There is no difference between any of them in this regard.

If I stated that...
"the government of country X should listen to me and my opinion matters superceding their decisions"

...then it would make sense for u to counter with...
"ur personal concept does not apply...or nations don't decide based on ur opinion"

However that wasn't the case...I presented my argument and gave reasons for why I had arrived at such an opinion...
U then started to justify it by saying that "right" and "wrong" doesn't apply and it's just a matter of perspective. I countered by telling u that actually u can list the pros and cons and weigh the outcomes...based on which u can in fact decide whether that decision is good or bad. So now that my time has been unnecessarily wasted...can u at least pick one argument or the other?

Either pick the one u just used...where u tell me that
"My opinion doesn't matter to the government(of whatever country)"
...in which case at least I can quit wasting my time bcuz that's a dumb argument to begin with

Or pick the other argument where u were debating how no decision is right or wrong and it's just a matter of perspective. In this regard I have already posted various replies to u.