Mamluk
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2016
- Messages
- 1,746
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
One of those "Pakistanis for hire" to write against Pakistan and its ally.
The moment the US gave the world to China
- Thread starter beijingwalker
- Start date
One of those "Pakistanis for hire" to write against Pakistan and its ally.
Hamartia Antidote
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2013
- Messages
- 35,188
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
- Location
The one can't deal with it, is you. US is showing crack. You are desperate to avoiding this point. Trump being appointed by white american shows the huge crack in US society that is getting bigger and bigger.
People didn't vote him in because we wanted to jail every non-white American. That's ridiculous. He got voted in because people didn't want Hillary in office. Do the math...not everybody who voted for Trump was a white person.
What an excuse you have. You are desperate trying to mask the racism most white American have in them. US society is cracking. Minority shall think twice about pledging their loyalty to US.
TruthSeeker
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2008
- Messages
- 6,390
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
I look forward to China's reign over the world. Wonder if they will do it in English? Will everyone have to learn hanxi?
The most racist countries in the world
By Staff Writer March 21, 2016
Economic and trading group, Insider Monkey, has combined the findings from two separate surveys in race relations and compiled a ranking of the 25 most racist countries.
The two surveys cover different aspects of racism, but not racism directly – as the group points out, many people may not even know if they are racist.
The first survey was conducted by the Washington Post and broadly asked if people would like having people of other races as neighbours. Answers saying no were assumed to have some form of racial basis.
The second survey was more direct, asking whether respondents had seen or experienced racism. All answers that we not a direct “no not at all”, were considered as a check next to racism.
The findings cover the responses of over 85,000 people from 61 countries between 2014 and 2015.
South Africa was ranked as the 9th most racist country based on the survey results, where 19.6% of people said they would not like having people of different races living next door to them – while 61.8% of people said they had witnessed or experienced some form of racism.
Recent data released by the South African Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) showed that South Africans feel like race relations in the country have worsened since 1994 – however, contrasting data from the Institute of Race Relations (IRR) found the opposite had ocurred.
In 2015, IRR commissioned a national opinion survey of public attitudes to race, empowerment, and other policy issues entitled Race: What South Africans really think.
Insider Monkey said that individually, the surveys are too broad to give an indication of racism, which is incredibly complex to ‘define’ due to the subjectivity involved – and even when combined, the topic of ‘racism’ still isn’t comprehensive.
However, “when you combine two or more approaches it is more likely that some of these biases cancel out and the resulting estimate is more accurate,” it said.
One caveat to the data was that it only covered 61 countries. “It is highly likely that the rankings would be different if (Syria and Austria) and other excluded countries were part of the survey,” the group said.
It said it applied the same method as it does to to identify the best stocks to invest in the stock market, which it does by calculating the consensus picks of over 700 hedge fund managers.
These are the 25 most racist countries based on the results:
# Country % Who don’t want neighbours of another race % of people who witnessed racist behaviour
1 India 43.6 64.3
2 Lebanon 36.3 64.4
3 Bahrain 31.1 85.7
4 Libya 54.0 33.5
5 Egypt N/A 39.7
6 Philippines 30.6 49.1
7 Kuwait 28.1 37.9
8 Palestine 44.0 32.0
9 South Africa 19.6 61.8
10 South Korea 29.6 36.5
11 Malaysia 31.3 34.4
12 Nigeria 21.0 42.5
13 Iraq 27.7 37.8
14 Kyrgyzstan 28.1 35.9
15 Ecuador 34.5 32.0
16 Algeria 19.8 41.0
17 Pakistan 14.5 48.8
18 Yemen 34.0 31.2
19 Hong Kong 18.8 40.4
20 Russia 17.0 38.5
21 Thailand 39.8 19.0
22 Cyprus 26.7 26.1
23 Turkey 33.8 19.1
24 Morocco 13.8 35.6
25 Japan 22.3 29.7
https://businesstech.co.za/news/lifestyle/116644/the-most-racist-countries-in-the-world/
The most racist countries in the world
By Staff Writer March 21, 2016
Economic and trading group, Insider Monkey, has combined the findings from two separate surveys in race relations and compiled a ranking of the 25 most racist countries.
The two surveys cover different aspects of racism, but not racism directly – as the group points out, many people may not even know if they are racist.
The first survey was conducted by the Washington Post and broadly asked if people would like having people of other races as neighbours. Answers saying no were assumed to have some form of racial basis.
The second survey was more direct, asking whether respondents had seen or experienced racism. All answers that we not a direct “no not at all”, were considered as a check next to racism.
The findings cover the responses of over 85,000 people from 61 countries between 2014 and 2015.
South Africa was ranked as the 9th most racist country based on the survey results, where 19.6% of people said they would not like having people of different races living next door to them – while 61.8% of people said they had witnessed or experienced some form of racism.
Recent data released by the South African Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) showed that South Africans feel like race relations in the country have worsened since 1994 – however, contrasting data from the Institute of Race Relations (IRR) found the opposite had ocurred.
In 2015, IRR commissioned a national opinion survey of public attitudes to race, empowerment, and other policy issues entitled Race: What South Africans really think.
Insider Monkey said that individually, the surveys are too broad to give an indication of racism, which is incredibly complex to ‘define’ due to the subjectivity involved – and even when combined, the topic of ‘racism’ still isn’t comprehensive.
However, “when you combine two or more approaches it is more likely that some of these biases cancel out and the resulting estimate is more accurate,” it said.
One caveat to the data was that it only covered 61 countries. “It is highly likely that the rankings would be different if (Syria and Austria) and other excluded countries were part of the survey,” the group said.
It said it applied the same method as it does to to identify the best stocks to invest in the stock market, which it does by calculating the consensus picks of over 700 hedge fund managers.
These are the 25 most racist countries based on the results:
# Country % Who don’t want neighbours of another race % of people who witnessed racist behaviour
1 India 43.6 64.3
2 Lebanon 36.3 64.4
3 Bahrain 31.1 85.7
4 Libya 54.0 33.5
5 Egypt N/A 39.7
6 Philippines 30.6 49.1
7 Kuwait 28.1 37.9
8 Palestine 44.0 32.0
9 South Africa 19.6 61.8
10 South Korea 29.6 36.5
11 Malaysia 31.3 34.4
12 Nigeria 21.0 42.5
13 Iraq 27.7 37.8
14 Kyrgyzstan 28.1 35.9
15 Ecuador 34.5 32.0
16 Algeria 19.8 41.0
17 Pakistan 14.5 48.8
18 Yemen 34.0 31.2
19 Hong Kong 18.8 40.4
20 Russia 17.0 38.5
21 Thailand 39.8 19.0
22 Cyprus 26.7 26.1
23 Turkey 33.8 19.1
24 Morocco 13.8 35.6
25 Japan 22.3 29.7
https://businesstech.co.za/news/lifestyle/116644/the-most-racist-countries-in-the-world/
Hamartia Antidote
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2013
- Messages
- 35,188
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
- Location
What an excuse you have. You are desperate trying to mask the racism most white American have in them. US society is cracking. Minority shall think twice about pledging their loyalty to US.
I hate to break the news to you but white people also voted for Hillary. She didn't get almost 50% by having only non-white people vote for her. It was a very very close contest. Trump won by a tiny fraction. You make it sound like he got 100% of the white vote and 0% of the non-white vote. That wasn't the case.
Last edited:
TruthSeeker
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2008
- Messages
- 6,390
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
If the U.S. withdraws, China wonders whether it is ready to lead the world
By Simon Denyer November 21 at 5:21 AM
If the United States under Donald Trump gives up its global leadership and withdraws into isolationism, will the rising superpower China replace it?
Ironically, in the past week, China has defended the system of global governance that the United States has done much to build.
Senior officials have urged Trump not to walk away from a global deal to address climate change, while President Xi Jinping told the Asia-Pacific region not to surrender to protectionist pressures but to recommit itself to globalization and free trade.
“Openness is the lifeline of the regional economy,” Xi said the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in the Peruvian capital, Lima, on Saturday.
The official Xinhua News Agency gushed that Xi’s speech put China and the region in the “vanguard” of a joint effort to revive the global economy.
Of course, the United States and China have sometimes used their power to ignore global rules, whether in sidestepping the United Nations to invade Iraq or in advancing territorial claims in the South China Sea.
Nevertheless, China is defending the collaborative, rules-based order because it has benefited hugely from the system: Its accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001 gave an immense boost to Chinese exports but also provided a real incentive for domestic economic reforms.
Its 1.4 billion people also stand to lose heavily if the planet continues to warm sharply.
But is China prepared to accept the burden of leadership?
In 2014, President Obama accused China of being a “free rider” on the world stage, but there is no doubt that under Xi, the country has been taking a more forceful global role — launching the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank in 2014 and a “Belt and Road”regional development plan.
China’s influence will also expand if Trump fulfills his campaign promise to walk away from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, an ambitious trade pact involving 12 Pacific Rim nations.
The TPP was a key element of Obama’s strategic rebalance to Asia, but his administration has given up on the idea of ratifying the deal in the lame-duck session of Congress.
China, meanwhile, has lost no time in pushing forward its vision for free trade in Asia, through a Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a potential deal it has long championed that involves 14 Asian nations, plus Australia and New Zealand.
The RCEP would involve much lower standards for the environment, labor rights and intellectual property protection than the TPP and does not include the United States, potentially leaving U.S. businesses at a competitive disadvantage in Asia.
“There's no doubt that there would be a pivot to the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership if the TPP doesn't go forward,” Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said, according to the Kyodo news agency.
Vietnam has indicated that it will not ratify the TPP, and Malaysia has said that it will turn its attention toward the RCEP negotiations. Chile and Peru also have expressed interest in joining RCEP negotiations in light of the TPP’s problems.
But championing a regional trade deal is not quite the same as leading the world, and, on that score at least, China is not yet ready to take up the burden.
“China, to its credit, has always been open that at its current stage of development, it has no capability or ambition to replace the United States,” said Yanmei Xie, a China policy analyst at Gavekal Dragonomics in Beijing. “It wants the U.S. to gradually relinquish some control and gradually make room for China. But it doesn’t want the U.S. to suddenly retreat — it doesn’t want to deal with the unpredictability and potential chaos that would go with that.”
Last week, China’s top envoy on climate change, Xie Zhenhua, said the United States still needed to play a joint leadership role in combating global warming. For one thing, developed countries have proposed about $100 billion in annual support for developing countries by 2020, a commitment that depends on Washington’s participation.
More broadly, though, the Global Times argued that China is still no match for the United States, as it lacks the ability and psychological readiness to lead the world.
“If Washington withdraws from the Paris climate deal, China can stick to its commitment, yet it won't be able to make up for the loss caused by the U.S.,” it wrote.
“Or if the U.S. takes on an anti-free trade path, the messy consequences will be beyond China's ability to repair.”
Even in the Asia-Pacific region, China “chafes” against U.S. dominance, Xie said, “but a lot of foreign-policy experts privately admit that China has benefited from peace and stability under the current order.”
The Global Times concluded that it was unimaginable that China could replace the United States.
“So Sino-U.S. cooperation is the only choice for future global governance. For a long time to come, the leadership of the U.S. will be irreplaceable,” it concluded. “Meanwhile, China's further rise is inevitable.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ina-wonders-if-it-is-ready-to-lead-the-world/
By Simon Denyer November 21 at 5:21 AM
If the United States under Donald Trump gives up its global leadership and withdraws into isolationism, will the rising superpower China replace it?
Ironically, in the past week, China has defended the system of global governance that the United States has done much to build.
Senior officials have urged Trump not to walk away from a global deal to address climate change, while President Xi Jinping told the Asia-Pacific region not to surrender to protectionist pressures but to recommit itself to globalization and free trade.
“Openness is the lifeline of the regional economy,” Xi said the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in the Peruvian capital, Lima, on Saturday.
The official Xinhua News Agency gushed that Xi’s speech put China and the region in the “vanguard” of a joint effort to revive the global economy.
Of course, the United States and China have sometimes used their power to ignore global rules, whether in sidestepping the United Nations to invade Iraq or in advancing territorial claims in the South China Sea.
Nevertheless, China is defending the collaborative, rules-based order because it has benefited hugely from the system: Its accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001 gave an immense boost to Chinese exports but also provided a real incentive for domestic economic reforms.
Its 1.4 billion people also stand to lose heavily if the planet continues to warm sharply.
But is China prepared to accept the burden of leadership?
In 2014, President Obama accused China of being a “free rider” on the world stage, but there is no doubt that under Xi, the country has been taking a more forceful global role — launching the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank in 2014 and a “Belt and Road”regional development plan.
China’s influence will also expand if Trump fulfills his campaign promise to walk away from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, an ambitious trade pact involving 12 Pacific Rim nations.
The TPP was a key element of Obama’s strategic rebalance to Asia, but his administration has given up on the idea of ratifying the deal in the lame-duck session of Congress.
China, meanwhile, has lost no time in pushing forward its vision for free trade in Asia, through a Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a potential deal it has long championed that involves 14 Asian nations, plus Australia and New Zealand.
The RCEP would involve much lower standards for the environment, labor rights and intellectual property protection than the TPP and does not include the United States, potentially leaving U.S. businesses at a competitive disadvantage in Asia.
“There's no doubt that there would be a pivot to the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership if the TPP doesn't go forward,” Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said, according to the Kyodo news agency.
Vietnam has indicated that it will not ratify the TPP, and Malaysia has said that it will turn its attention toward the RCEP negotiations. Chile and Peru also have expressed interest in joining RCEP negotiations in light of the TPP’s problems.
But championing a regional trade deal is not quite the same as leading the world, and, on that score at least, China is not yet ready to take up the burden.
“China, to its credit, has always been open that at its current stage of development, it has no capability or ambition to replace the United States,” said Yanmei Xie, a China policy analyst at Gavekal Dragonomics in Beijing. “It wants the U.S. to gradually relinquish some control and gradually make room for China. But it doesn’t want the U.S. to suddenly retreat — it doesn’t want to deal with the unpredictability and potential chaos that would go with that.”
Last week, China’s top envoy on climate change, Xie Zhenhua, said the United States still needed to play a joint leadership role in combating global warming. For one thing, developed countries have proposed about $100 billion in annual support for developing countries by 2020, a commitment that depends on Washington’s participation.
More broadly, though, the Global Times argued that China is still no match for the United States, as it lacks the ability and psychological readiness to lead the world.
“If Washington withdraws from the Paris climate deal, China can stick to its commitment, yet it won't be able to make up for the loss caused by the U.S.,” it wrote.
“Or if the U.S. takes on an anti-free trade path, the messy consequences will be beyond China's ability to repair.”
Even in the Asia-Pacific region, China “chafes” against U.S. dominance, Xie said, “but a lot of foreign-policy experts privately admit that China has benefited from peace and stability under the current order.”
The Global Times concluded that it was unimaginable that China could replace the United States.
“So Sino-U.S. cooperation is the only choice for future global governance. For a long time to come, the leadership of the U.S. will be irreplaceable,” it concluded. “Meanwhile, China's further rise is inevitable.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ina-wonders-if-it-is-ready-to-lead-the-world/
Thəorətic Muslim
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2012
- Messages
- 5,006
- Reaction score
- 17
- Country
- Location
The one can't deal with it, is you. US is showing crack. You are desperate to avoiding this point. Trump being appointed by white american shows the huge crack in US society that is getting bigger and bigger.
Trump won the election. If you want someone to "blame" it's not the "whiteman" it's the people who didn't come out to vote for a worse alternative.
As for racism. I'm sure you'll love to visit your Chinese Comrades in the Western part of your country to see how much better China is to the US.
maximuswarrior
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2016
- Messages
- 13,771
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Freebie for China. China is going capitalize and fill the void. It is an absolute no-brainer with Trump the clown and his anti-Muslim bandwagon leading the USA. Dark times ahead for a protectionist USA. The world is questioning how this is even possible. A racist, misogynistic xenophobic parasite is leading the "free" world. America is being run like the apprentice show. China ought to grab this golden opportunity with both hands.
The world isn't crazy. Everything unfolded before our eyes. Everything that has been said and done. No matter what these Trump bigots say, the entire world isn't convinced with a clown calling the shots. He is unpredictable and foolish. His temperament can be compared to a little whining baby. No experience and skill. Just rhetoric and a foul mouth. Even the staunchest of US allies are fearful about the future prospects. China is a stabilizing factor in the world. The entire world knows what to expect from China. The whole world doesn't have a clue what to expect from Trump's America. Thus far, his team comprises of bigots and warmongers. That doesn't bode well for anyone. Things look bleak. Very bleak.
China has a golden opportunity. With the current Trump administration we can safely assume that the US war machinery is going to be in full throttle in the coming years. The upcoming years are a window of opportunity that cannot be missed. China should continue to invest abroad and win the hearts and minds whilst the US continues to lose both at home and abroad. China should do this as it always perfectly does holding a low profile. The US is a divided country under the leadership of Trump and that will remain so forever. Trump is too divisive. Trump is too arrogant. These Trump traits are beneficial to China. Under Trump the US simply won't win. The Trump saga is the first and final nail in the coffin. No a doubt about it.
What an excuse you have. You are desperate trying to mask the racism most white American have in them. US society is cracking. Minority shall think twice about pledging their loyalty to US.
The world isn't crazy. Everything unfolded before our eyes. Everything that has been said and done. No matter what these Trump bigots say, the entire world isn't convinced with a clown calling the shots. He is unpredictable and foolish. His temperament can be compared to a little whining baby. No experience and skill. Just rhetoric and a foul mouth. Even the staunchest of US allies are fearful about the future prospects. China is a stabilizing factor in the world. The entire world knows what to expect from China. The whole world doesn't have a clue what to expect from Trump's America. Thus far, his team comprises of bigots and warmongers. That doesn't bode well for anyone. Things look bleak. Very bleak.
China has a golden opportunity. With the current Trump administration we can safely assume that the US war machinery is going to be in full throttle in the coming years. The upcoming years are a window of opportunity that cannot be missed. China should continue to invest abroad and win the hearts and minds whilst the US continues to lose both at home and abroad. China should do this as it always perfectly does holding a low profile. The US is a divided country under the leadership of Trump and that will remain so forever. Trump is too divisive. Trump is too arrogant. These Trump traits are beneficial to China. Under Trump the US simply won't win. The Trump saga is the first and final nail in the coffin. No a doubt about it.
Last edited:
Beidou2020
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 7,857
- Reaction score
- -48
- Country
- Location
This article is incredibly stupid.
Chinese-Dragon
RETIRED TTA
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 33,932
- Reaction score
- 52
- Country
- Location
Who the Hell says China wants to lead the world? 
What China cares about is our own national interests. Let America continue to be the World Policeman and keep building up that debt pile.
What China cares about is our own national interests. Let America continue to be the World Policeman and keep building up that debt pile.
It's American choice and you need to respect it since you all brag about the merit of democracy.
It's good that they can come back to China. But for you, I don't know where you can go.
You hate Chinese, of cos you will badmouth China. At least China don't have a leader who openly talk abt banning Muslim or kick out the minority.
Thəorətic Muslim
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2012
- Messages
- 5,006
- Reaction score
- 17
- Country
- Location
It's American choice and you need to respect it since you all brag about the merit of democracy.
It's good that they can come back to China. But for you, I don't know where you can go.
Merits of Democracy support Trump's win.
I'll be here in the US.
Similar threads
