The message is clear: The BJP is against terrorists only if those terrorists are Muslim

[SwAggeR]

in such cases, the more enlightened people from a gathering impress or force the gathering to accept their ideas or questions simply through intellectual debate... remember, in these discussions, before a consensus is formed, everyone is allowed a chance to put their opinion or question.

so how can this be ridiculous?? it is the most natural kind of opinion making.

So now you want intellectuals to force their way to 100% consensus ?? Great idea. So then we can have forced 100% democracy.

therefore, deriving from what i said above, the societies you call democracies are not democracies then because they simply impose majority opinion or will at the threat of arrest, death, boycott or general harassment.

Didn't we adopt this form of democracy back in 1950 ??So what changed to make you think on those lines ?? World over that democracy is
being followed and we see no rejection or revolt.

my mistake in not reading your question properly.

yes, there were pakistanis and many other guest workers ( including from india ) who went to libya before 2011 and some stayed on since.

at the start of the 2011 war, libya had about 6 million total population, including 2 million guest workers... during the war, many black africans were brutally captured by the terrorist gangs and tortured by cutting, burning, slicing and other forms... the "rebels" ( nato-supported terrorists ) said they suspected the black african workers to be fighting for muammar gaddafi but the terrorists were simply being racist.

below links document atrocities done by the "rebels"...

1. NATO-rebel atrocities in Libya: photo and video evidence

2. libya rebel atrocity - Google Search

Don't twist and twirl , I was not asking about laboures. I was asking how many people applied for permanent citizenship of Libya or was their any refugee or asylum seeker in Libya ??Come on be honest to own up if you don't have valid argument, don't waste bandwidth just for the sake of doing it.