Shabaz Sharif
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2006
- Messages
- 4,000
- Reaction score
- -15
- Country
- Location
That's not related. Read this:
"
Studies based on mtDNA variation have reported genetic unity across various Indian sub–populations. Conclusions of studies based on Y Chromosome variation and Autosomal DNA variation have been varied, although many researchers argue that most of the ancestral nodes of the phylogenetic tree of all the mtDNA types originated in the subcontinent. Recent genome studies appear to show that most Indians are descendants of Ancestral North Indians (related to Central Asians, Middle Easterners and Europeans) and Ancestral South Indians who are not closely related to external groups, except possibly the aboriginal populations in Australia.
It has been found that the ancestral node of the phylogenetic tree of all the mtDNA types typically found in Central Asia, the Middle East and Europe are also to be found in South Asia at relatively high frequencies. The inferred divergence of this common ancestral node is estimated to have occurred slightly less than 50,000 years ago. In India the major maternal lineages, or mitochondrial DNA Halogroups, are M, R and U,whose coalescence times have been approximated to 50,000 BP."
For more information please visit Anthroscape
Read again what you posted.
"It has been found that the ancestral node of the phylogenetic tree of all the mtDNA types typically found in Central Asia, the Middle East and Europe are also to be found in South Asia at relatively high frequencies."
Does it mean europeans, central asians and south asians look similar? Nope just share common haplogroup which are 20-30 thousand years old. ASI-ANI is admixture, thats what harappanda.