What's new

The Malaysian miracle: some lessons for Pakistan

Yankee-stani

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 22, 2018
Messages
8,100
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Both Malaysia and Pakistan have had general elections in 2018, with two new governments in place that share a few similarities. Both have a strong anti-corruption rhetoric that contributed to their massive electoral victories. Both countries have a large majority of Muslim populations and are being led by charismatic leaders that enjoy huge public trust and support. Although Malaysia gained independence in 1957 it has been treading on a high economic growth trajectory for many decades now and has emerged as a global economic giant.

During a visit to the East Asian country the Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan expressed the desire to learn from the Malaysian experience. The PM expressed the same desire while visiting China as well. In 1980, the year before Mahathir Mohamad became Prime Minister, Malaysia’s gross domestic product was just $12 billion. By last year, it had grown to $210 billion, and per capita income stood at $3,540, the third-highest in Southeast Asia.

However, it will be interesting to see what exactly Pakistan could potentially imbibe from the Malaysian experience particularly related to its Economic growth and development. Malaysia’s underlying economic strengths include a diversified economic structure, a strong external position, robust institutions, and significant natural resources and human capital endowments. Nonetheless, a much detailed analysis of historical, cultural, social and political dynamics will be required to understand the environment in which economic progress took place in the East Asian nation.

Considering the current challenges the government is facing, Pakistan can certainly benefit looking into three attributes of Malaysian economic and political policy.

Pakistan still struggles with building, forging and delineating a balance between various institutions

Firstly, export led growth achieved by Malaysia has been phenomenal. Pakistan currently faces an enormous mismatch in balance of payments that keeps recurring due to its dwindling exports base. In order to improve on foreign reserve account we need more vibrancy in export sector coupled with value addition, technological and product upgradation. In Malaysia the successful development of the electronics and electrical (E&E) industry is particularly noteworthy from the perspective of diversification given its minimal links to resource-based industries. Its take-off created jobs for previously underemployed rural workers, accelerating urbanization through migration and boosting on-the-job upskilling. According to ADB (2014) since the 1990s, it has been the leading contributor to Malaysia’s participation in global value chains, producing components such as semiconductors for mobile devices and automotive components, as well as computer parts. E&E exports are presently Malaysia’s largest exported component, accounting for approximately 36 percent of total export by 2015. In terms of Malaysia’s leading export destinations in 2015, Singapore and China accounted for around 14 percent and 13 percent respectively of total exports. Post CPEC Pakistan must also take leverage from the opportunity of enhancing its export productivity and boost trade with China, Iran, Turkey, Afghanistan and other SAARC countries. It also needs to focus on technological and product upgradation towards medium value added and high valued exports. While capitalizing on textile, leather and other products with competitive advantage it needs to build its capacity in energy production and local manufacturing industries to support CPEC initiatives.

Secondly, education and investment in human capital is a pivotal pillar of any sustainable, long term economic development policy. There is an urge in the incumbent government in both countries to invest more in R&D and education and skills. The PM Khan recently inaugurated the PM house which has been converted into a university. It is debatable whether antics provide any real support to the cause. Albeit, there is an awareness of the need for change. The question is how quickly we can upgrade the education system in terms of imparting high quality instruction and updated skillset?

Considering the level of social development in Malaysia, it has also been exceptional with the advancement in human capital development. Malaysia’s education policy has long focused on inclusiveness, and access to education has improved vastly in recent years. In line with the Millennium Development Goals, it has reached near-universal levels, with primary education enrolment at around 98 percent in 2015 and secondary education enrolment at around 89 percent respectively. Increasing the quality of education is critical to boosting human capital development and workforce productivity, increasing the availability of skilled workers and improving Malaysia’s attractiveness to investment in higher value-added activities. Ambitious reforms are already underway to improve collaboration between industry and tertiary educators to align curricula to industry specifications and internationally recognized qualifications, while also increasing opportunities for job placements during and after the completion of studies. The Education Blueprint 2013-2025 provides the overarching framework for reforms to basic education. Reforms have also been introduced for more holistic examinations and student benchmarking, a comprehensive framework for teacher evaluation, training and career development.



Thirdly, an effective, coherent and a unanimous foreign policy is what Pakistan needs direly since past many decades. Regional integration and cooperation is one of the cornerstones of Malaysia’s foreign policy hence Pakistan must also strengthen regional cooperation with its neighbors. Peace in Afghanistan and opening trade with Iran can be extremely important for peace and stability in the region. Pakistan must also keep emphasizing the importance of SAARC in South Asia to enhance economic cooperation within the region as it is still one of the least integrated regions in the world. Inclusion of more members may help in ameliorating the dominance of a single player (India) which holds back SAARC from regional cooperation as per its convenience. In order for SAARC to become effective forum for redressal of issues of the countries in the region it needs to take cues from ASEAN.

Pakistan could stress the strategic significance of the regional treaty and call for addressing the environmental challenges, boosting the level of trade and business cooperation between regional countries, progressing intra-regional communications in terms of road transport as well as enhancing energy network could be helpful in promoting regional peace and security.

Pakistan government also must turn towards real and pressing issues of the public and make them a central concern instead of playing political gimmicks with dissenting voices implicitly or explicitly. Rising inflation, unemployment, declining exports and remittances should be a grave policy concern.

A combination of long -term stability, shrewd government policies, strong private sector development and political and social stability all contributed to the success of economic diversification in the Malaysian context. Moreover, in Malaysia politicians can come and go without having all that much effect on the outcome because it’s a reasonably well institutionalized country. There is no risk of a military takeover. Malaysia inherited a strong division between the bureaucracy and the military, with the bureaucracy in control.

Pakistan still struggles with building, forging and delineating a balance between various institutions. In order to have sustained progress, ending politics of victimization and reformation of accountability mechanisms to have impartiality and transparency could be instrumental in keeping checks and balances in place while curbing misuse of political power in case of violation.

The writer is an Economic Development Analyst based in Lahore and has represented Pakistan at the Young Diplomat Forum

Published in Daily Times, December 30th 2018.



  • 15
    Shares


Submit a Comment






Dubai Photos That Will Make You Wonder About VisitingDefinition|

Sponsored





The World's Best Glasses Site Finally Arrives in Fresh MeadowsGlassesUSA.com|

Sponsored




Why Millennials Are Ditching Take Out For This #1 Rated Meal KitHome Chef|

Sponsored






Play this for 1 min and see why everyone is addicted!Vikings: Free Online Game|

Sponsored





I Tried The Target Hack Everyone’s Talking About — And It’s Actually Pretty GeniusWikibuy|

Sponsored




Remember Him? Your Jaw Will Drop When You See Him NowCash Roadster|

Sponsored





Shah Mehmood Qureshi all set to leave PTI - Daily TimesDaily Times





Mohsin Abbas Haider’s daughter passes away - Daily TimesDaily Times








Turnout falters but France’s ‘yellow vest’ protests rumble on
EMAIL EDITION


Daily Times in your inbox
* indicates required
Email Address *






Sponsored Links
You May Like

Take a Look Inside Oprah Winfrey’s MansionMonagiza





Doctor: Diet Is Likely Not The Problem, This IsLCR Health





Man Who Called NASDAQ Crash Has Surprising New PredictionInvesting Outlook





50+ and Single? These Dating Sites Are Really WorkingWeekly Dating Insider





Stop Doing This 1 Thing With Your PasswordsTruthFinder Guardian





Doctor's New Discovery Makes Foot Calluses "Vanish"DermalMedix Skin Care




by Taboola






PAKISTAN

Fake bank accounts case: SC orders seizure of all records

‘Establishment’ always ‘maltreats’ those who serve country: Zardari

Pakistan to start repayment of loans from 2021: China

FIA recommends SC to close Asghar Khan case

PM concerned over political situation in Sindh
More Posts from this Category

BUSINESS

PSX Index plummets 3% WoW on political noise, economic concerns

Austria plans digital tax while EU keeps working on its own levy

Industrial production to become standstill if gas supply, low pressure not maintained by SSGC

The Fed could be a factor in the week ahead as stocks exit the worst year in a decade

Women bearing brunt of job losses due to automation, new data shows
More Posts from this Category

WORLD

Turnout falters but France’s ‘yellow vest’ protests rumble on

DR Congo goes to the polls after troubled odyssey

French start-up offers ‘dark web’ compass, but not for everyone
More Posts from this Category

footer-d.png
 
.
. . .
@OsmanAli98 the last half of the article is an eye sore...might be best to delete that stuff (after the article text) before posting etc.
You know I have come around to the distressing conclusion that Pakistan was never going to anywhere from day one. That big talk about the 1960s is all hot air. Huge US aid package [bigger then CPEC in dollar adjusted terms] coupled with a sliver of highly educated officialdom [legacy of British Raj] who were 'brown sahibs' or might be disparagingly called coconuts like President Imran Khan gave a superficial look of success.

But below teaming millions of 'desi' masses lived and thought like they always did. The thinking that had been recipe for slavery. We can see how British subjagated South Asia so easily. What did they subjagate? A mass of desi-dom. After all there was no liberal or westoxified cnuts like me about then.

As the memory of the British Raj withered the desi masses exploded in numbers and we went back to where we were. Pakistan failed to turn the desi mass into a modern educated populace. That space was taken over by mullahs like Rizvi etc of the TLP on one end and others who were not so extreme but still displayed that animus against progress. Interestingly Malaysia uses Tulisan Rumi, literally "Roman script". Interesting that Turks, Indonesians also use the same.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malay_alphabet
 
.
The author miss out on one major contributing point.
Malaysia do not get involved nor engage in any armed conflicts with any country hence there is no over spending on military equipments

Minus the brief 1965-1966 border war with Indonesia and the break up of Singapore -Malayla union lack of conflict there
 
. .
Minus the brief 1965-1966 border war with Indonesia and the break up of Singapore -Malayla union lack of conflict there
Errmm that one with indonesia, well they tried to invade to form greater Indonesia, they call it Ganyang but was pushed back.

That one Singapore expulsion was due to internal politics + racism, there was no armed conflict ir civil war.
 
.
I am not convinced of that. South Asia traditionally has been one of the lowest expenders on military. East Asia is far higher. Singapore has always maintained a huge military.


gpol12328-fig-0003-m.png

Legacy of the "Cold War "to be honest and now part of the 2010s Strategy of "Indo-Pacific" counter towards PRC
 
.
Legacy of the "Cold War "to be honest and now part of the 2010s Strategy of "Indo-Pacific" counter towards PRC
No. Malaysia invested heavily in military because of Singapore/Indonesia. Singapore is a city state [smaller then Lahore] with a army/airforce so large that could take on Pakistan. They have national compulsory service.
 
.
You know I have come around to the distressing conclusion that Pakistan was never going to anywhere from day one. That big talk about the 1960s is all hot air. Huge US aid package [bigger then CPEC in dollar adjusted terms] coupled with a sliver of highly educated officialdom [legacy of British Raj] who were 'brown sahibs' or might be disparagingly called coconuts like President Imran Khan gave a superficial look of success.

But below teaming millions of 'desi' masses lived and thought like they always did. The thinking that had been recipe for slavery. We can see how British subjagated South Asia so easily. What did they subjagate? A mass of desi-dom. After all there was no liberal or westoxified cnuts like me about then

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malay_alphabet

Lol You meant Ayub Khan you got confused with Imran Khan, anyways, I do look at 1960s Pakistan and I say what the hell happen here, first the problem was after 1948 and the death of Jinnah the ideology of Pakistan got muzzled by opportunists and frankly the Americans saw India and Nehru as a little bit enamoured with the USSR so they sided with Pakistan on those grounds,as for the legacy of Brown Sahibs I think they failed to cultivate a Unified Nationalism for the masses to rally around Pakistan as a nation instead they bought in retarded regionalism and later on as the 1970s came along our dear "Arab" brothers bought in wahabbism thanks to that cuck Bhutto who wanted those Petro-Sheikh money which then continued on with Zia.
 
.
I am not convinced of that. South Asia traditionally has been one of the lowest expenders on military. East Asia is far higher. Singapore has always maintained a huge military.


gpol12328-fig-0003-m.png

Well SG historically maintained high military expenditure since thr founding of Singapore because the early days due to fear of being attacked by her neighbours who are all muslim countries. atleast it was their thought right after being expelled from Malaysia.

Prepped for survival, SG afterall is very small landmass wise.
 
.
No. Malaysia invested heavily in military because of Singapore/Indonesia. Singapore is a city state [smaller then Lahore] with a army/airforce so large that could take on Pakistan. They have national compulsory service.

Relations between those states are still cordial at best, compared with India and Pakistan
 
.
As the memory of the British Raj withered the desi masses exploded in numbers and we went back to where we were. Pakistan failed to turn the desi mass into a modern educated populace. That space was taken over by mullahs like Rizvi etc of the TLP on one end and others who were not so extreme but still displayed that animus against progress. Interestingly Malaysia uses Tulisan Rumi, literally "Roman script". Interesting that Turks, Indonesians also use the same.

Agree with the first part; pakistan indeed have failed to educate masses. However, alphabet change have nothing to do with it; china, japan, south korea etc being prime examples. Actually it's other way around. Majority of the well educated countries teach at-least till secondary education in their local language. We for some reason put all emphasis on English medium curriculum. English can be taken as elective as one of the foreign languages to learn but that should never be the medium of teaching. And on the top of all this converting a language to a different alphabets rather will create a bigger gap of non-comprehension on local level and will drag people more away from education.
 
.
Well SG historically maintained high military expenditure since thr founding of Singapore because the early days due to fear of being attacked by her neighbours who are all muslim countries. atleast it was their thought right after being expelled from Malaysia.

Prepped for survival, SG afterall is very small landmass wise.

Add in the fear of Communist China using the Ethnic Chinese and the use of ethnic Malays by Malaysia was also another reason too
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom