The Iranians have built two mosques in China, one of which is a prince of Persia.

[Beast]

And this is me censoring myself because the mods simp for ch*na and would delete my replies.

We dont want to deal with India who are anti-Muslim. Ask Modi if you dont believe it.

 

[Beast]

YOL DONG NO LONG, MA PENGYOU (and neither is modi monkey's)! YOL YINJING WEILY XIAO XIAO, hence your opinion is fucking worthless to me and everyone else.

ME HUANG XIANSHENG LAOWAI, DONG LONG EMPELOL! YING YANG YEETUS, SHINAJIN DELETUS!

@waz @LeGenD

Please take care of this troll. Thank you.

 

[BlessedKingOfLonging]

@waz @LeGenD

Please take care of this troll. Thank you.

Them deleting my thread won't change the fact that SHINAJIN YINGJING WEILY XIAO XIAO TAO CAO CAO.

 

[drmeson]

YOL DONG NO LONG, MA PENGYOU (and neither is modi monkey's)! YOL YINJING WEILY XIAO XIAO, hence your opinion is fucking worthless to me and everyone else.

ME HUANG XIANSHENG LAOWAI, DONG LONG EMPELOL! YING YANG YEETUS, SHINAJIN DELETUS!

You need to grow up. You being an Indian person have anti China sentiments is understandable. But, since you are hoisting the Iranian flag, respect the ancient Iranian ally.

 

[BlessedKingOfLonging]

You need to grow up. You being an Indian person have anti China sentiments is understandable. But, since you are hoisting the Iranian flag, respect the ancient Iranian ally.

Snap out of it. Have you seen how they treat North Korea which has been a neighbouring state and which they share a staggering amount of history with? We abuse USA for the sanctions but China is the one accepting bribes to enforce them and keep it on the brink.

Knowing this, are you really that naïve to believe they'll actually treat you better? Hah! And I don't care about sino-indian hostilities - I want both sides to bludgeon one another bloody so long as I'm unaffected. I'm on my own side here.

 

[drmeson]

Snap out of it. Have you seen how they treat North Korea which has been a neighbouring state and which they share a staggering amount of history with? We abuse USA for the sanctions but China is the one accepting bribes to enforce them and keep it on the brink.

Knowing this, are you really that naïve to believe they'll actually treat you better? Hah! And I don't care about sino-indian hostilities - I want both sides to bludgeon one another bloody so long as I'm unaffected. I'm on my own side here.

Your way of talking is immature is all I am saying. Iranians do not talk this way. China is Iran's ally and largest trade partner. Our biggest export market is China no one else, they are one of the big reasons we laugh at JCPOA.

 

[BlessedKingOfLonging]

Your way of talking is immature is all I am saying. Iranians do not talk this way. China is Iran's ally and largest trade partner. Our biggest export market is China no one else, they are one of the big reasons we laugh at JCPOA.

Fantastic! Then we're at least partially in agreement. In fact, my original comment stated in black and white that Iran's relationship with them has to be a business and military partnership and I respect that they circumvent the JCPOA to do business with Tehran.

BUT they're NOT allies. Hezbollah are allies, PMU are allies, Ansarallah are allies...they share the belief system and political ideology with us (a single outlier among allies is the DPRK which while clearly alien in these two categories still shares common political goals and is a defence partner like no other).

Beware the dragon...in future, I'll mention how their business malpractices work and what their end goal regarding Iran is (it means nothing good for Iranians) and how they can potentially exploit it but heed my warning for now - it's given in good faith.

 

[Beast]

Them deleting my thread won't change the fact that SHINAJIN YINGJING WEILY XIAO XIAO TAO CAO CAO.

It wouldn't be just deleted. You will disappear from this forum too. Becos you are trolling and contribute rubbish to this forum only.

Your way of talking is immature is all I am saying. Iranians do not talk this way. China is Iran's ally and largest trade partner. Our biggest export market is China no one else, they are one of the big reasons we laugh at JCPOA.

He is an Indian, not Iranian.

 

[BlessedKingOfLonging]

It wouldn't be just deleted. You will disappear from this forum too. Becos you are trolling and contribute rubbish to this forum only.

Lol, look who's talking - the shinajin who spams shamelessly himself.

Trust me, if they ban my account, I'll return in short order and be back in full swing while you will be left tugging on your xiao yinjing in frustration, twat-eyes.

He is an Indian, not Iranian.

Missed by a light year. You don't know shit about me.

 

[Leishangthem]

chinese musilms should be chinese-muslim not middle eastern- Muslim ,the wahabi like radical cult influence is need to be checked,china already knows that.

 

[drmeson]

Fantastic! Then we're at least partially in agreement. In fact, my original comment stated in black and white that Iran's relationship with them has to be a business and military partnership and I respect that they circumvent the JCPOA to do business with Tehran.

BUT they're NOT allies. Hezbollah are allies, PMU are allies, Ansarallah are allies...they share the belief system and political ideology with us (a single outlier among allies is the DPRK which while clearly alien in these two categories still shares common political goals and is a defence partner like no other).

Beware the dragon...in future, I'll mention how their business malpractices work and what their end goal regarding Iran is (it means nothing good for Iranians) and how they can potentially exploit it but heed my warning for now - it's given in good faith.

DPRK is not some massive defense partner of Iran for the last 20+ years I will tell you that. If the magnitude of import of technology is to be considered post-revolution, proven origins are in this order:

1) China (small quantity of fighters, Radar tech, AD tech, Naval missiles, FACs)
2) Russia (Fighters, Radars tech, AD, large Subs, torpedoes)
3) DPRK (Initial Hwasongs, light sub blueprints)
4) US (AT missiles, Air defense, Spare parts for IRIAF)
5) Israel during the early days of war supplied much needed stuff for IRIAF

It wouldn't be just deleted. You will disappear from this forum too. Becos you are trolling and contribute rubbish to this forum only.


He is an Indian, not Iranian.

Well, hopefully, he will learn to behave maturer.

 

[BlessedKingOfLonging]

DPRK is not some massive defense partner of Iran for the last 20+ years I will tell you that. If the magnitude of import of technology is to be considered post-revolution, proven origins are in this order:

1) China (small quantity of fighters, Radar tech, AD tech, Naval missiles, FACs)
2) Russia (Fighters, Radars tech, AD, large Subs, torpedoes)
3) DPRK (Initial Hwasongs, light sub blueprints)
4) US (AT missiles, Air defense, Spare parts for IRIAF)
5) Israel during the early days of war supplied much needed stuff for IRIAF



Well, hopefully, he will learn to behave maturer.

The bulk of Iranian missile technology which is being fielded has a lot of DPRK DNA in it, right from the Qiam-1s launched at ayn al-asad to the Kheybarshekan MaRV that was unveiled some time ago. Also, the Ghadir class submarines the Navy uses have their origin in a KPA Navy midget class submarine...and there's a lot more.

So please, don't insult Pyongyang in such a way and elevate b*ijing to a pedestal where it doesn't deserve to be. Certainly, it exported some very important hardware which is now a staple of the Iranian Armed Forces and Hezbollah but it was bottom to lower middle of the shelf, nothing cutting edge. DPRK on the other hand cooperated and shared technology at the very highest levels of it's development.

 

[drmeson]

The bulk of Iranian missile technology which is being fielded has a lot of DPRK DNA in it, right from the Qiam-1s launched at ayn al-asad to the Kheybarshekan MaRV that was unveiled some time ago. Also, the Ghadir class submarines the Navy uses have their origin in a KPA Navy midget class submarine...and there's a lot more.

So please, don't insult Pyongyang in such a way and elevate b*ijing to a pedestal where it doesn't deserve to be. Certainly, it exported some very important hardware which is now a staple of the Iranian Armed Forces and Hezbollah but it was bottom to lower middle of the shelf, nothing cutting edge. DPRK on the other hand cooperated and shared technology at the very highest levels of it's development.

Hwasong-7 (itself tech transfer of Scuds) gave birth to Shahab-1/2 in 1980s/90s, that is it. That DNA later became Shahab-3 which is retired now in favor of Emad and Qiam-2, the MaRV's of both are totally indigenous.

Rest of the far more dangerous arsenal is totally indigenous

-Sejjil 2/3 IRBM, no missile in the world matches its motor dia, the MaRV could be Salman TVC which is used in SLVs
-Qassem, KheibarShikan Glide vehicle, Kahlije fars AShBM comes from Fateh series which again has zero equivalent in the outside world
-Khorramshahr may have some Hwasong-12 like gas output but its MaRV is again indigenous. Its constantly evolving so it may end up being totally different.

Ghadir class submarine has driven hull design from North Korean Yono blueprints, fitted with Iranian electronics, fires Hoot super cavitation torpedo which is probably TOT of it Russian Schkval, launches Nasr/Jask which is TOT of Chinese C-704. How come it is of North Korean design origin only?

So please, don't insult Pyongyang in such a way and elevate b*ijing to a pedestal where it doesn't deserve to be. Certainly, it exported some very important hardware which is now a staple of the Iranian Armed Forces and Hezbollah but it was bottom to lower middle of the shelf, nothing cutting edge. DPRK on the other hand cooperated and shared technology at the very highest levels of it's development.

Iranian Military-Industrial Complex design origins: Sino-Russian-American Tech > DPRK. Its a fact regardless of politics and ideologies.

 

[tower9]

2，The Qingjing Mosque[1] (simplified Chinese: 清净寺; traditional Chinese: 清淨寺; pinyin: Qīng Jìng Sì; Pe̍h-ōe-jī: Chheng-chēng-sī; Arabic: مسجد الأصحاب‎, romanized: Masjid al-Aṣḥāb), also known as the Ashab Mosque, is a mosque located in the city of Quanzhou, Fujian, China.The Islamic calendar is 400 years old. Rebuilt and expanded by Ahmed Ben Mohamed Jades of Persia (present-day Iran)

I have been to this mosque. Most of it was damaged by a massive storm a hundred years ago so most of it was not rebuilt. But there are still some buildings there, I spoke with the Imam who was there.

 

[SalarHaqq]

4) US (AT missiles, Air defense, Spare parts for IRIAF)
5) Israel during the early days of war supplied much needed stuff for IRIAF

The US and zionist regimes did not transfer these weapons deliberately, for they never intended to support Islamic revolutionary Iran let alone in a strategic manner. What actually happened, is that Iran forced their hand in 1983 by escalating massively in Lebanon, with pro-Iranian elements bombing the Beirut Marines barracks (and killing 241 US military personnel in addition to 58 French troops), eliminating the regional CIA station chief and arresting a consequential number of western journalists suspected of engaging in espionage activities. In exchange for mediating the release of these detainees, Iran asked its enemies to sell her some needed weaponry, considering she had been placed under total arms embargo by both western and Soviet blocs, and considering that the Iranian military had inherited essentially American equipment from the ousted pro-western monarchy.

It is important to restore the historic context when evoking these arms transfers, and also to characterize them for what they were - a deal brought about by nothing other than unilateral Iranian pressure. Else uninformed readers may conclude that the zio-Americans had a policy of siding with the Islamic Republic against Saddam's Iraq, which would be historically incorrect; outright enemies for their part will be given ammunition to spread their fallacious propaganda that Iran's policy of Resistance is a nothing but smoke and mirrors intended to mislead Muslim audiences and mask opposite intentions etc. This is without mentioning how sparse and overpriced these weapons sold to Iran were, while Iraq was literally being flooded with weaponry.

As for allegations of spare parts deliveries by Isra"el" during the early days of the war, sources making these claims are not solid. They include, namely, dissident air force officers loyal to the monarchy who fled Iran after continuing to serve for a few years after the Revolution. Also, some of these sources make mention of weapons known for never having been in Iran's possession, so they have no credibility. After the victory of the Revolution and even before the start of the Imposed War, Iran completely reversed her international alliances and above all began resisting both US and especially zionist imperialism right away. Isra"el"is present in Iran under the shah regime didn't wait for Imam Khomeini's arrival to flee in panic. The former zionist diplomatic mission in Tehran was replaced by a Palestinian one and Yasser Arafat welcomed with open arms in Tehran. The main leader of local zionist networks in Iran, Habib Elghanian was executed by firing squad.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habib_Elghanian#Arrest_and_execution

So clearly, the deep antagonism between Iran and the zionist occupation regime was firmly in place already when Iraq launched its aggression on September 22, 1980.

Also, the role played by the zionists in the Iran-Contra affair was confined to furnishing, upon request from Washington, some of the weapons to arms dealers who would then go on selling them to Iran. The US administration presided over by Reagan, was keeping the entire operation secret including from Congress, not least because the money paid by Iran was used to assist Contra rebels in Nicaragua. It was therefore out of the question for Washington to tap into its own weapons stockpiles, and so it switched to Isra"eli" ones. Tehran had been kept in the dark about this indirect zionist involvement, and when Iran discovered that certain arms she received had been procured from Tel Aviv, she immediately put an end to all transactions with the involved arms dealers.

There hasn't been any tacit understanding between Iran and the zionist entity. The animosity is deep rooted, structural and uncompromising. Tel Aviv's hostility towards Iran is definitely of an existential, not of a flexible or cyclical nature. So while it is technically factual that Iran received some (not many) weapons from the enemy during the war, it was a consequence of Iran herself coercing them into these transactions and not a case of them wishing to support Iran. I believe it's crucial to always remind this fact in order to prevent misunderstandings from emerging.

When it comes to military level assistance, one may also mention Syria (and to a lesser extent Libya). It was Damascus which allowed Iran to properly familiarize itself with ballistic missile technology for the first time.