Indrajit
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2016
- Messages
- 543
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
first. NIA chief gave clean chit to pakistan on pathankot. its on record. almost every newspaper reported it.
second. TTP and BLA are indian proxies who carried even more worst attacks than URI. its indian distinction to use non state actors on innocent. even if uri attackers were pakistani proxies, they killed soldiers not civilians.
it doesn't matter what indian army sees. they saw pakistan army when the terrorists were still kicking their asses. you can't defeat us conventionally either. not when we are not surrounded by india on three sides and sea on the fourth side.
No clean chit was given to Pakistan, JeM is the organisation held responsible. The NIA chief's statement was limited to say that he had no specific indication that official agencies of Pakistan supported JeM to carry out the attack.
Uri attack is seen as an attack by the PA & it is the PA that will face the consequences. The Indian army makes no distinction whether the PA or its proxies attacked. A war is not necessary for retribution to happen. Retribution was inevitable the moment this attack took place. The only question is whether the retribution is dealt with by local commanders or at a higher level. This is not the first time such attacks have taken place. As before, retribution is guaranteed.
Well you have jumped the gun as always then. Either the boys did it or they didn't do it simple.
You cannot say Pak army did it, then refuse to answer the logical fallacy's this assertion entails & then say they maybe didn't do it and were caught unaware. Pick a story and stick to it.
We have said J-e-M has done it. From day 1.The PA allows JeM cadres as well as other such organisations to operate & supports them. We hold PA equally responsible. That's the only story here.