What's new

The India-China Rivalry by Robert D. Kaplan

But none of those nationalities have the psychotic paranoia that Indians have about 1962. :rolleyes:

Your media is in English, everyone here can read it. You guys have an obsession regarding the "China threat", that is only getting stronger as time goes on.

i was talking about the indians in HK.

and yes, our media sticks to sensationalism of trivialities since its more profitable
 
.
and yes, our media sticks to sensationalism of trivialities since its more profitable

And the Indians believe it all.

Can you honestly tell me with a straight face, that Indians are not emotional towards China regarding 1962? Or regarding China's partnership with Pakistan, which culminated with them developing nuclear weapons?

Also, I added more to my previous post.
 
.
And the Indians believe it all.

Can you honestly tell me with a straight face, that Indians are not emotional towards China regarding 1962? Or regarding China's partnership with Pakistan, which culminated with them developing nuclear weapons?

Also, I added more to my previous post.

Why shouldnt we be emotional to the fact that china can destroy us. The govt channels cannot afford to be emotional. Can you tell me with a straight face that the online community of china was not emotional with Agni V launch?
 
.
Can you tell me with a straight face that the online community of china was not emotional with Agni V launch?

Absolutely yes.

In the 1970's, China had ICBM's with 10,000+ km range, which were able to carry multiple-megaton nuclear warheads.

40 years later... India doesn't have EITHER one of the above.

Indians are getting really exited about an IRBM launch, but it just really highlights the fact that India does not have what we had 40 years ago. If anything, it was a shocking reminder of how far behind India still is.

More shocking than the "India only has two days worth of ammo" revelation.
 
.
We'll have relative peace till 2025, after that there indefinite years of wars, including nuclear wars. and deaths will be in billions.

The reason is simple , the rate at which the human population is growing , with limited resources its impossible to sustain this kind any longer. There will be some radical population cut through wars and mass murders.
 
. .
We'll have relative peace till 2025, after that there indefinite years of wars, including nuclear wars. and deaths will be in billions.

The reason is simple , the rate at which the human population is growing , with limited resources its impossible to sustain this kind any longer. There will be some radical population cut through wars and mass murders.

did you read david murrin's book 'breaking the code of history'?

tbh, all along i thought india had ICBMs. when they announced they will test fire their first ICBM, i was kinda shocked.
because china had ICBMs in the early 1970s.
i always thought india was not too far behind china in strategic weapons like ICBM, SLBM.
 
.
Absolutely yes.

In the 1970's, China had ICBM's with 10,000+ km range, which were able to carry multiple-megaton nuclear warheads.

40 years later... India doesn't have EITHER one of the above.

Indians are getting really exited about an IRBM launch, but it just really highlights the fact that India does not have what we had 40 years ago. If anything, it was a shocking reminder of how far behind India still is.

More shocking than the "India only has two days worth of ammo" revelation.


Even if we are 200 yrs behind China, the fact is that we had tested this missile successfully. It is perfectly normal reaction.... we cant mourn saying china had better weapons 50 yrs back. It was a success and will be cheered.
 
.
That is some sort of joke right? :lol:

Go to any Indian website and look for comments about China. About 1% of them are based on cold hard logic, 99% of them are based on emotion.

To say that Indians are not emotional about their rivalry with China, is simply a lie. We've all heard the screaming about 1962 and our cooperation with Pakistan, day in and day out.

But we aren't actually doing much about it. While china is actively involved in weaponzing Pakistan as a hedge against India a so that Pakistan may severely wound india even at the cost of its own demise in process . China has been playing this dangerous game and India was smart enough to not fall for it in spite of repeated Pakistani provocation.
 
.
But we aren't actually doing much about it. While china is actively involved in weaponzing Pakistan as a hedge against India a so that Pakistan may severely wound india even at the cost of its own demise in process . China has been playing this dangerous game and India was smart enough to not fall for it in spite of repeated Pakistani provocation.

China and India had no big conflicts with each other, until India hosted our largest separatist group in 1959. And as if that was not enough, India then followed up with the Forward Policy in 1962.

This happened right when we in the middle of the worst famine in Chinese history (1959-1961). India saw our weakness as an opportunity.

All the other disagreements in Sino-Indian relations happened after these events.
 
.
That intimacy is inflamed by a religious element: Pakistan is the modern incarnation of all of the Muslim invasions that have assaulted Hindu northern India throughout history. And then there is the tangled story of the partition of the Asian subcontinent itself to consider

And that does translate itself into the ruling Indian class.
 
.
Even if we are 200 yrs behind China

Not the question of 200 or 500, but can we delopy the missile and send shivers or not :cheers:

China and India had no big conflicts with each other, until India hosted our largest separatist group in 1959. And as if that was not enough, India then followed up with the Forward Policy in 1962.

This happened right when we in the middle of the worst famine in Chinese history (1959-1961). India saw our weakness as an opportunity.

All the other disagreements in Sino-Indian relations happened after these events.

The cat will always close eyes while drinking mik and will assume that nobody is watching it :lol:
 
.

That intimacy is inflamed by a religious element: Pakistan is the modern incarnation of all of the Muslim invasions that have assaulted Hindu northern India throughout history. And then there is the tangled story of the partition of the Asian subcontinent itself to consider

And that does translate itself into the ruling Indian class.

This is not quite an accurate diagnosis.

India is quite friendly with the nations from where the invaders came.

Pakistanis are overwhelmingly of South Asian ancestry, and their hostility towards India is rooted in their divorce from their ancestral civilization.
 
.
China and India had no big conflicts with each other, until India hosted our largest separatist group in 1959. And as if that was not enough, India then followed up with the Forward Policy in 1962.

This happened right when we in the middle of the worst famine in Chinese history (1959-1961). India saw our weakness as an opportunity.

All the other disagreements in Sino-Indian relations happened after these events.

Honestly do you know what is problem between afghanistan and Pakistan with respect to Durand line?

China says India follows illegal Macmohan line (drawn by british imperialist)
Similary Afghanistan says Pakistan follows illegal durand line (drawn by british imperialist)
Even India Pakistan border line is drawn by British imperialist. So is it illegal?


So either China and Afghanistan are right OR India and Pakistan are right.

Please choose one which is right
 
.
Absolutely yes.

In the 1970's, China had ICBM's with 10,000+ km range, which were able to carry multiple-megaton nuclear warheads.

40 years later... India doesn't have EITHER one of the above.

Indians are getting really exited about an IRBM launch, but it just really highlights the fact that India does not have what we had 40 years ago. If anything, it was a shocking reminder of how far behind India still is.

More shocking than the "India only has two days worth of ammo" revelation.

Good, so there is nothing for you to worry about.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom