What's new

The incredible story of how Col. Narendra Kumar secured the Siachen Glacier for India.

hkdas

BANNED
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
2,271
Reaction score
-20
Country
India
Location
India

In the army, they knew him as ‘Bull’ Kumar, awed as his mates were by the strength of his thick, muscular neck. Col Narendra Kumar earned this sobriquet at the National Defence Academy, then in Dehradun, during the first boxing match he fought. His rival was a senior cadet, S.F. Rodrigues, who went on to become the chief of army staff. Col Kumar lost the bout, but the ‘Bull’ epithet stuck.

Since then, Col Kumar has done everything in his long military career to justify the name his colleagues gave him. Like the bull, he loves a challenge, sniffs it even before others can see it, and goes at it in a single-minded pursuit, indifferent to consequences, full tilt, tail up. It was these qualities of his that ensured the Siachen glacier became an integral part of India.

The heroic story of Col Kumar dates to 1978, when he took a major expedition to the inhospitable glacier. This was six years before India launched Operation Meghdoot to thwart Pakistan’s designs on the Siachen glacier. No doubt, he knew the mountains well, commissioned as he had been into the Kumaon Regiment and consequently having spent the better part of his military career surrounded by troops born and bred in the rugged hills of Kumaon. Yet glaciers aren’t just stunningly beautiful mountainscape: they can numb, daze and kill you. Col Kumar, posted as the commandant of the army’s High Altitude Warfare School (HAWS) in Gulmarg then, knew he was heading into uncharted territory. “This was the first major expedition into the unknown,” he says, reminiscing about it in his flat in Delhi. “We had some reports that the Americans were showing Siachen as part of Pakistan in their adventure maps.”

What Kumar and his team planned was to reach the glacier’s snout, its lowest point, where the ice melts into water, and then trek up the 77 km of treacherous crevasses, mountains, passes and snow-covered peaks to reach the source. The colonel knew the stakes were high, that this mission could decide the future of India’s strategic outreach and establish a critical wedge between Azad Kashmir and the swathe of Indian territory the Chinese had occupied in the aftermath of 1962. “Our equipment wasn’t the best, we didn’t have any maps,” he recalls. “We were going in blind and all we had was a rough idea of the peaks which had been named by the British decades ago.”

Bound to each other by thick ropes, trekking across the harsh terrain for weeks on end, Col Kumar became the first Indian to climb the Sia Kangri peak, which offers a majestic view of the Siachen glacier. But there was also a surprise awaiting the team—a Japanese mountain expedition facilitated by the Pakistan military had a presence there. After a “sit-rep” (situational report) was dispatched to the army headquarters, the team went from peak to peak, staying ahead of snow avalanches to chart the area.

Bull Kumar led other expeditions till 1984, losing four toes to frostbite. His sacrifice wasn’t to go waste.

Cut to 1984: intelligence information convinced the army headquarters that the Pakistanis were planning to militarily occupy Siachen and the heights of the nearby Saltoro ridge. There was evidence: in the autumn of 1983, a team from the Indian army’s elite Ladakh Scouts had sighted a Pakistani special forces unit from the ssg in the Siachen area. This prompted the area army headquarters to immediately draw up plans for a major operation in the summer of 1984. The fourth battalion of the Kumaon Regiment was assembled and equipped for Operation Meghdoot, which had as its bulwark Kumar’s maps, films and his knowledge of the area.

On April 13, 1984, Operation Meghdoot finally got under way. Air force choppers, their engines clattering in protest at being pushed to the limits of technological possibility at incredible heights, began to drop soldiers at Bilafond La which is today part of the Siachen Base Camp. For the first time in history, India had stamped its claim on the Siachen glacier. The sturdy Kumaonis then trekked up the glacier to secure the two major passes—the Sia La and Gyong La—even as the Pakistanis were scrambling their troops into the region. The Kumaonis moved up the Saltoro ridge, overlooking the approach from Azad Kashmir, and Sia Kangri to establish posts that would give India the command of the glacier. With hands veritably frozen around their 7.62 mm rifles, Indian troops battled the elements to establish a military foothold in what would become the world’s highest battlefield.

“At times, you face impossible choices on the glacier. We always moved in pairs, bound to each other by rope. At one point, my buddy fell into a crevasse. For 45 minutes, I grappled with the idea of dying with him or cutting him loose and saving my life or to hang with him till the cold killed us both. I am glad that I never cut the rope.” In those 45 minutes, the buddy crawled up, the duo living to continue their foray from peak to peak.

To the west of the glacier were hostile Pakistani troops; on the east and to the north stood the Chinese. Had Col Kumar been given a clearance, he’d perhaps have climbed the K2 peak in the Karakoram ranges as well. But to reach K2, he’d have had to traverse the Shaksgam valley, which the Pakistanis had illegally ceded to China. So, India halted its advance on reaching the northernmost tip of the Siachen glacier, settling in on its frozen waste.

As Indian troops established more posts, a key base on the glacier was named Kumar Base: perhaps the only living Indian army officer to enjoy this singular honour. India’s claim to Siachen was confirmed. But the “refrigerated combat” against the elements and Pakistan had only just begun.

The incredible story of how Col. Narendra Kumar secured the Siachen Glacier for India.
 
.
Pakistan launched an all out assault in 1987 and again in 1989 to capture Siachen, the Soltoro ridge and passes held by India. The first assault by Pakistan's SSG was headed by then Brigadier Musharraf who initially managed to capture a few high points before being pushed back from where he had started.

Later the same year, Pakistan lost at least one major Pakistani post, Quaid which came under Indian control and renamed Bana Post in recognition of Bana Singh who launched a daring daylight attack, after climbing 1,500 ft of ice cliff. Bana Singh was awarded the Param Vir Chakra — the highest gallantry award of India for the assault that captured the post. Bana Post is the highest battlefield post in the world today at a height of 22,143 feet.

The second assault in 1989 by Pakistan's SSG was also unsuccessful and the ground positions did not change. The loss of most of the Siachen area and the subsequent unsuccessful military forays by Pakistani forces especially the SSG, prompted Benazir Bhutto to taunt Zia ul Haq that he should wear a burqa as he had lost his manliness! (From: Demilitarisation of Siachin by Air Marshal [R] Ayaz A Khan, PAF).
 
.

In the army, they knew him as ‘Bull’ Kumar, awed as his mates were by the strength of his thick, muscular neck. Col Narendra Kumar earned this sobriquet at the National Defence Academy, then in Dehradun, during the first boxing match he fought. His rival was a senior cadet, S.F. Rodrigues, who went on to become the chief of army staff. Col Kumar lost the bout, but the ‘Bull’ epithet stuck.

Since then, Col Kumar has done everything in his long military career to justify the name his colleagues gave him. Like the bull, he loves a challenge, sniffs it even before others can see it, and goes at it in a single-minded pursuit, indifferent to consequences, full tilt, tail up. It was these qualities of his that ensured the Siachen glacier became an integral part of India.

The heroic story of Col Kumar dates to 1978, when he took a major expedition to the inhospitable glacier. This was six years before India launched Operation Meghdoot to thwart Pakistan’s designs on the Siachen glacier. No doubt, he knew the mountains well, commissioned as he had been into the Kumaon Regiment and consequently having spent the better part of his military career surrounded by troops born and bred in the rugged hills of Kumaon. Yet glaciers aren’t just stunningly beautiful mountainscape: they can numb, daze and kill you. Col Kumar, posted as the commandant of the army’s High Altitude Warfare School (HAWS) in Gulmarg then, knew he was heading into uncharted territory. “This was the first major expedition into the unknown,” he says, reminiscing about it in his flat in Delhi. “We had some reports that the Americans were showing Siachen as part of Pakistan in their adventure maps.”

What Kumar and his team planned was to reach the glacier’s snout, its lowest point, where the ice melts into water, and then trek up the 77 km of treacherous crevasses, mountains, passes and snow-covered peaks to reach the source. The colonel knew the stakes were high, that this mission could decide the future of India’s strategic outreach and establish a critical wedge between Azad Kashmir and the swathe of Indian territory the Chinese had occupied in the aftermath of 1962. “Our equipment wasn’t the best, we didn’t have any maps,” he recalls. “We were going in blind and all we had was a rough idea of the peaks which had been named by the British decades ago.”

Bound to each other by thick ropes, trekking across the harsh terrain for weeks on end, Col Kumar became the first Indian to climb the Sia Kangri peak, which offers a majestic view of the Siachen glacier. But there was also a surprise awaiting the team—a Japanese mountain expedition facilitated by the Pakistan military had a presence there. After a “sit-rep” (situational report) was dispatched to the army headquarters, the team went from peak to peak, staying ahead of snow avalanches to chart the area.
So this article or story whatever basically attests to the Pakistani claim that Siachin was invaded by the Indians. Good.
 
.
So this article or story whatever basically attests to the Pakistani claim that Siachin was invaded by the Indians. Good.

Do u know Why We captured Siachen

The glaciers are the source of several rivers going in to both India and Pakistan
So if u control the Tap
You will control the flow of water
Control of Siachen ensures that UN doesn't have problems if we build Dams on rivers across Kashmir
 
.
So this article or story whatever basically attests to the Pakistani claim that Siachin was invaded by the Indians. Good.
the article says that india capture the land pakistan had occupied... you must read history before trolling..
 
. .
I was wondering if we can establish a road to Xinxiyang from J and K, from Sikkim to Tibbet and onwards while from Uttarakhand to Lhasa. And in north east sector from Arunachal or Nagaland to Chengdu and Kunming should be connected by at least 4 lane highway. More faster connectivity means more people to people contact and more economic activity. Which in long term will give much more return overall as compared to so called 10 to 20 km wide still not confirmed LAC. This my imaginative scenario. Future lies in area integration. Lets see future turns out.
 
.
Funny thing is indians brag about capturing siachen, lol a frozen waste land. They dont realize that india has been cut into so many pieces. Pakistan, Bangladesh, then China defeats them and capture their territory and infact recently again entered indian territory. Lost 1948 war to Pakistan when we captured one-third Kashmir. Lost 1962 war to China and again in 1965 failed to capture Lahore and had to settle for truce. Got humiliated in Sri Lanka when their own trained terrorists LTTE killed so many indian soldiers.
LOL. Let the rebuttal begin.

:bunny: :bunny: :bunny: :bunny:
 
. .
Funny thing is indians brag about capturing siachen, lol a frozen waste land.

fools won't understand the importance of siachen... do you think that pakistan and india fighting for a waste land is for notting??
 
.
Pakistan, Bangladesh, then China defeats them and capture their territory and infact recently again entered indian territory. Lost 1948 war to Pakistan when we captured one-third Kashmir. Lost 1962 war to China and again in 1965 failed to capture Lahore and had to settle for truce. Got humiliated in Sri Lanka when their own trained terrorists LTTE killed so many indian soldiers.
LOL. Let the rebuttal begin.

are you trying to prove that you are and idiot and fool or trying to troll here?? when did pakistan, bangladesh defeat india?? we lost 1948 war?? are you mad?? during 1947 war UN intervene and declare ceasefire. before 1947 kashmir was a separate country. show some shame man... in 1965 pakistan was at a blink of defeat. indian army was performing well in srilanka... we captured large area of srilanka form LTTE.. the only failed operation of IPKF was Jaffna University Helidrop all other operation was successful... withdraw of IPKF was political... not a military decision
in mean time all the wars pakistan do with india had ended in defeat of pakistan.. hell pakistan lost half of its territory. pakistan have the highest casualty from terrorism. every day pakistanis are dying due to terrorist attacks done by those terrorist formed by pakistani military... living ina propaganda world you seems to be unaware of the things happening around you... very pathetic
 
. .
Funny thing is indians brag about capturing siachen, lol a frozen waste land. They dont realize that india has been cut into so many pieces. Pakistan, Bangladesh, then China defeats them and capture their territory and infact recently again entered indian territory. Lost 1948 war to Pakistan when we captured one-third Kashmir. Lost 1962 war to China and again in 1965 failed to capture Lahore and had to settle for truce. Got humiliated in Sri Lanka when their own trained terrorists LTTE killed so many indian soldiers.
LOL. Let the rebuttal begin.

:bunny: :bunny: :bunny: :bunny:

Bangladesh , hahahahahahahaahahahahaha
 
.
The LoC in that was undemarcated at that point in time. So neither party can claim occupation.

Details here:

Truth/Facts About Pakistani Claim Over Siachen Glacier


There is another book about Siachen; written by Lt.Gen.V.R.Raghavan. Its name--- Siachen: Conflict without end.
Have'nt read it yet; but may do so later. Right now; I'm better occupied reading the 'Diary of Zehiruddin Babar' and reading about Bahadur Shah Zafar. :)

But here is a review of Gen. Raghavan's book by Ayesha Siddiqua. There are other reviews too, but they are Indian; so I am posting this one by a Pakistani reviewer. Take a look at it, and then at the book itself; if you feel like. That may be preferable to a PPT...... :D


Siachen: conflict without end by Lt Gen V.R. Raghavan


Reviewed by Dr Ayesha Siddiqa-Agha

When I met Lt General Raghavan in Delhi before reading his book on Siachen, his claim that he had written the first definitive work on the subject sounded pompous. However, after reading the book, I can understand where the author's confidence came from. This is, indeed, the first respectable piece of research on the subject. Prior to reading the book, one was also unsure of the research and writing skills of army generals, particularly from the Indian subcontinent. Raghavan's book should dispel this scepticism.

Although presenting an Indian perspective, the 350 page monograph is an excellent study of what the armies of India and Pakistan have been doing at the glacier since 1984. More important, it tells the story of why an insane battle is being fought at such ridiculous heights -and tells it in a readable style. Of course, one does not expect an Indian general to present Pakistan's perspective. However, the publication makes one wish that a Pakistani military officer could also write a readable and honest account of Siachen or other military adventures/ operations that remain a mystery to the public.

The study analyses the history of the conflict and the conduct of the war. Both Pakistan and India had an eye on the glacier. Contrary to the perspective that launching an operation to take control of the Siachen glacier was a unilateral decision on India's part, the author's claim is that Islamabad had started to make the necessary moves to establish control of the glacier and that the Indian military operation was basically to upstage the Pakistan army's military manoeuvres. Thus, as rightly pointed out by the author: "The Siachen dispute is a prime example of geopolitics influencing policies and strategic choices."

Apparently, Pakistan wanted to draw a line connecting the point NJ 98428 a point where the LoC and the CFL terminated, with the Karakoram pass. This move was an extension of an earlier move whereby Pakistan had acceded some of its territory to China as per the 1963 boundary agreement between Islamabad and Beijing, a development contested by New Delhi. The initial move was made by Pakistan through changing the lines on the map and exhibiting its control over the glacier through granting mountaineering permits to foreign mountaineers. The author claims that the Indian move, hence, was retaliatory.


Despite the lucid assessment of why the two armies decided to engage each other at such dangerous and unforgiving heights, one still fails to fathom why both sides tend to underestimate each other's resolve not to allow the other side an inch of extra land. Seemingly, through an occupation of Siachen glacier, which is a fact and not the author's imagination, Islamabad had hoped to take a roundabout way to solving the Kashmir issue. However, it soon discovered that the issue cannot be solved by either side through a military operation.

According to Lt General Jahandad Khan, who has been cited in this book, the reason for Pakistan's interest in the glacier was political. The fear was that had the army not responded to Indian moves, the Pakistan army's lack of initiative would have been exploited by the political opposition
. However, the fact is that the armies and the people of both countries are stuck with the conflict in Siachen.

Another significant aspect of this book relates to what it has to say about Pakistan not having control of or a presence in the Siachen glacier. In fact, the author's claim is that Pakistani troops have been confined to the lower and western slopes of the Saltoro ridge. Furthermore, the Pakistani Army post closest to the Siachen glacier is at a distance of about 15-16 kilometres. Interestingly, the author gives details of the Indian army's tactical operations describing the manner in which such a target was achieved. This far, there is no authentic research in Pakistan to challenge this claim
. With lack of analysts in Pakistan that write on conduct of war it would be difficult for someone to present the picture from this side of the border.

This is the first time that one has come across a study that helps a reader comprehend the complexity of planning an operation at such painful heights. The description of how both Pakistani and Indian troops used dangerous, often suicidal, methods to climb up certain heights or reclaim some land from the other, is nauseating and makes one anxious about the sanity of the policymakers. To be fair to the author, he has given due credit to Pakistani troops for achieving the impossible on certain occasions.

Reading the description of the tactical operations one not only wonders what this insanity is worth, but one can also understand why soldiers fighting at and around Siachen would have little regard for the media's need for information on this war. Raghavan has an entire section dedicated to the media's coverage of the conflict and the way journalists are shipped to such heights to cover the ongoing battle. Although one can sympathize with General Raghavan's own sense of bitterness at how little does the media understand the pain that his men have gone through, the fourteenth chapter seems a bit superfluous. It fails to connect with the rest of the book or the argument in the study.

The negotiations on Siachen have been of significance. What might be of interest to the Pakistani readership are details of the occasions when political governments in Islamabad found themselves at variance with the army during discussions on the issue. There are more than three cases mentioned in the book in which Pakistan's political governments were at odds with its armed forces. They only reinforce the view that the military keeps the civilian leadership out of the bargaining process on key issues.

Of course, it is hard to imagine a book that is perfect and this study has its problems too. One of the areas where the author might have contributed more was the section on the cost of this conflict. Raghavan cites several people and the figures provided by them. However, he is almost silent on the subject and one does not believe that he did not have access to the information. The cost of conflict is a very important issue in any evaluation of its worth. What makes it doubly important is that the people of India and Pakistan have a right to know the price of their leadership's insanity. It is only by disclosing the costs can one hope to strengthen the hands of civil society on both sides of the divide to fight their battle with their establishments.
 
.
There is another book about Siachen; written by Lt.Gen.V.R.Raghavan. Its name--- Siachen: Conflict without end.
Have'nt read it yet; but may do so later. Right now; I'm better occupied reading the 'Diary of Zehiruddin Babar' and reading about Bahadur Shah Zafar.
But here is a review of Gen. Raghavan's book by Ayesha Siddiqua. There are other reviews too, but they are Indian; so I am posting this one by a Pakistani reviewer. Take a look at it, and then at the book itself; if you feel like. That may be preferable to a PPT......

The facts speak for themselves. Siachen was never a viable claim for Pakistan if one refers to primary sources that govern the situation.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom