That is a completely different topic.
Right now the topic at hand is provoking violence. The guy clearly knew what he was doing. Made a circus of it. If not for a reaction than for what?
Provoking violence vs people who actually participate in violence, I'm sorry I'm not buying this victim mentality and double standards. Muslims can call people with derogatory terms like heretic, apostate, pagan and support this claim with Islamic history and tradition to call for taking violent action against these groups, unless mainstream Islam reforms and joins the 21st Century we gonna be going around in circles. These beliefs kill people, they killed people on 9/11, 7/7, Charlie Hebdo, Paris attacks and Manchester arena attack, the list is quite long just in Europe and it gets worse in Middle East and South Asia. So please don't come back to me with iffs and buts, these are real acts of violence all done in the name of Islam.
PS: Where is Pakistan's outrage over internment of Muslim Uighur people? As we speak nearly a millions Uighurs men, women and children are being forced away from their beliefs, culture and language. They have no legal rights, no trial or civil society to defend their rights. So before Muslims living in Europe swear at the same governments that protect them they should be grateful they are not in Saudi, Iran or China.
Empty talks from bullies.
Don't you hear blacks threatened also?
So can you kindly stop your "personal victim complex" and think about the community. as a whole.
I don't have victim complex I used it to show how far the brainwashing goes within mainstream Muslim community and what the children are learning in quran and religious school classes here in the UK. I dread to think what they teach kids in Pakistani madarsas, oh wait we do know that's why nearly 70,000 Pakistanis have died since 2001.
You could actually. It was not given a special name but folded under freedom of speech .
BBC itself promoted an unknown guy anjem chaudry ...someone who has no religious training, no degrees in Islamic knowledge as a host to represent Muslims for years?
Why him among other learned people? He was always invited and allowed to B'S freely without needing to prove his crap
Anjem Choudhry actually used freedom of speech and human rights to preach hatred against the state and its people, I agree the media shouldn't have given him a platform but he did create a political hate group which was eventually banned and Anjem finally behind bars. Anjem knew exactly how to use human rights laws to spread his bullshit. The British state and the left PC bullshitters have allowed this to get out of hand with their holier then thou attitude towards political Islam. I know Muslims that openly say that Britain should have sharia law, adulterers should be stoned to death, apostates should be put to death, these are not a minority views but held by a large minority. Of course when a non Muslim English guy hears these views hes gonna be either really scared or angry and many times both of these emotions go hand in hand. Hatred breeds more hatred, why isn't their Hinduphobia? Buddhisitphoba, Christian phobia in the UK?
Only a self reflection and inner criticism of some teachings within Islam can get rid of this violent political ideology that has attached itself to Islam. Christianity went through major reforms after being challenged by growing secular voices as well as reformist movements of Europe after it had wrecked the continent for centuries. Islam doesn't really seem to have many reformist movements, anytime someone tries to reform Islam to modern age they are automatically considered out of fold of Islam as Islam doesn't need change, its the perfect religion from the 7th Century, all of its texts apply to modern age even if it was written down for desert dwelling caravan raiders in the 7th Century.