What's new

The Guardian says Modi as PM 'will bode ill for India' in open letter

why is her previous nationality so important to you. Are you not the same guys that take pride if any Indian gets to be lawmaker in other countries.
Answer is in your question,i am not an Italian to take pride by making her PM.And by the way do you know when she got married and when she took the Indian citizen ship.she didnot rule out of PM race because she choose to,but she dint have a choice.she was the first person to take flight with the kids and Rajiv when emergency was declared.
She dint get married to Rajiv because of her love for India,she got Indian citizenship because of her marrage.
I can go on and on,why she should not be.
 
.
The hypocrisy of Western media is known to the world. They shout about and insult other nations and call themselves democratic people yet if Indians are having the largest elections in the world they are butt hurt who Indians will elect.
 
. .
A Lot of you Indians claim to be secular but at same time support modi which I find odd.
As expected, a lot of you Pakistanis have no clue about the meaning of secularism or for that matter democracy. And I do not find that odd at all..
 
.
There are 54 country with Muslim as Majority, None of them are secular...



So Muslims are not allowed to use this term.. Islam and Secularism (or other religion) are opposite poll. Where there is Islam there is no secularism and no other religion.
 
.
Just fcuk these retards ..

Soon we will see NaMo as PM of India
 
. . . .
What I’m trying to say is that there are alot of Indians that claim to be secular but seem to be ok with voting for a Hindu nationalist
 
.
What I’m trying to say is that there are alot of Indians that claim to be secular but seem to be ok with voting for a Hindu nationalist
What is wrong in being a Hindu nationalist?? And what it has to do with secularism??
 
.
The Guardian says Modi as PM 'will bode ill for India' in open letter
HT Correspondent, Hindustan Times New Delhi, April 11, 2014


A number of respected academicians including writer Salman Rushdie have signed an open letter in The Guardian saying “it would bode ill” for India if BJP prime ministerial candidateNarendra Modi were to be elected to the top post.

In the midst of the general elections, the letter published on Thursday brings up the 2002 Gujarat riots under Modi’s watch as chief minister and states it is “crucial to remember the role played by the Modi government in the horrifying events that took place in Gujarat in 2002”.

“If Modi is elected, it will bode ill for India's future,” reads the headline.



The open letter, which refers to Modi refusing to "accept any responsibility or to render an apology", has been signed by a host of internationally known names such as artist Anish Kapoor, Prof Homi K Bhabha and filmmaker Deepa Mehta.

It talks of the Muslim minority being the “victims of pillage, murder and terror, resulting in the deaths of more than 2,000 men, women and children" during the riots.

According to state government records, of more than 1,200 people killed in the 2002 riots, nearly 950 were Muslims.

The letter also talks of the condition of women during the riots and states they were “subjected to brutal acts of violence and were left largely unprotected by the security forces”.

Regarding the possibility of Modi becoming India's next PM, it says, "Were he to be elected prime minister, it would bode ill for India's future as a country that cherishes the ideals of inclusion and protection for all its peoples and communities."

The open letter comes days after The Economist infuriated the BJP by calling Modi “divisive”.


The guardian petition:

If Modi is elected, it will bode ill for India's future
Modi refuses to accept any responsibility or to apologise for the horrifying events that took place in Gujarat in 2002

Narendra-Modi-010.jpg

Narendra Modi, the prime ministerial candidate of the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance for the 2014 Indian general elections. Photograph: Nisarg Lakhmani/Demotix/Corbis
Salman Rushdie, Imran Khan, John McDonnell, Fiona Mactaggart, Pragna Patel,Jayati Ghosh, Suresh Grover

Thursday 10 April 2014 17.15 BST

Without questioning the validity of India's democratic election process, it is crucial to remember the role playedby the Modi government in the horrifying events that took place in Gujarat in 2002. The Muslim minority were overwhelmingly the victims of pillage, murder and terror, resulting in the deaths of more than 2,000 men, women and children. Women, in particular, were subjected to brutal acts of violence and were left largely unprotected by the security forces. Although some members of Narendra Modi's government are now facing trial, Modi himself repeatedly refuses to accept any responsibility or to render an apology. Such a failure of moral character and political ethics on the part of Modi is incompatible with India's secular constitution, which, in advance of many constitutions across the world, is founded on pluralist principles and seeks fair and full representation for minorities. Were he to be elected prime minister, it would bode ill for India's future as a country that cherishes the ideals of inclusion and protection for all its peoples and communities.

Anish Kapoor, artist
Homi K Bhabha, professor of the humanities, Harvard University
Salman Rushdie, novelist
Deepa Mehta, film director
Dayanita Singh, artist
Vivan Sundaram, artist
Dame Helena Kennedy, barrister
Imran Khan, solicitor
Mike Wood, British Member of Parliament
John McDonnell, British Member of Parliament
Fiona Mactaggart, British Member of Parliament
Jacqueline Bhabha, director of research, François-Xavier Bagnoud Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard University
Kumar Shahani, film director
Geeta Kapur, art historian
Pragna Patel, director of the Southall Black Sisters
Sashi Kumar, film producer
Jayati Ghosh, economist
Prabhat Patnaik, economist
MK Raina, actor/film director
Ram Rahman, artist
Saeed Mirza, screenwriter
Anuradha Kapur, National School of Drama in Delhi
Kumkum Sangari, professor of English and the humanities, University of Wisconsin
Gautam Appa, emeritus professor, London School of Economics
Chetan Bhatt, professor of sociology, London School of Economics
Suresh Grover, director, Southall Monitoring Group
Some of the people who voted against him - I have deep respect, including Sir Rushdie.

But Modi will prove them wrong. :coffee:


What is wrong in being a Hindu nationalist?? And what it has to do with secularism??
A lot. Being a Hindu nationalist means he is not secular.

Now question is if being secular is the most important thing in the world? Especially in the Indian context.

In my opinion, a person can never be truly secular. An organization or a country can be. That is the purpose of a secular society - where the individual (natural) biases of individuals across the spectrum does not ideally interfere with policy making.

So even if Narendra Modi is a Hindu nationalist or even a Baha-i Nationalist, it does not matter as long as the Constitution is followed and good governance delivered. Given his track record in governance I would be willing to give him a term rather than probably well meaning but paranoid intellectuals.
 
.
.
Guardian UK and educated armchair signatories please read this
British MP Barry Gardiner :
Gardiner said Modi's "integrity, ability to administer and govern and strategic political thinking is of the highest order". He called him "a secular leader who has the overwhelming support of all communities in Gujarat... proven time and time again in state elections". "I have met politicians from across the world and I rank him on the pinnacle of all political leaders I have known," Gardiner said. "His competence to govern is unbelievable." Asked whether Modi is capable of governing India, Gardiner said, "Gujarat is the size of the UK or any European country. Since he has taken the state to the highest pinnacles of growth, it's easy to see him as the head of the UK or any European country." On Gujarat riots, Gardiner said, "The Supreme Court has till now exonerated Modi of all charges regarding the riots, and I believe the Supreme Court. We have to access the man on his capability to govern. It took us four days to control the London riots in 2012. It took him three days to bring the riots to a stop in Gujarat.
 
Last edited:
.
It's ironic that concern over communal agendas are sprouting from a British news paper. A little bit of self introspection would have been helpful for them.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom