The Great Game Changer: Belt and Road Intiative (BRI; OBOR)

[Rechoice]

Hanoi Vietnam 1972. B 52 attack of US air-force in Hanoi.


US pilot was captured.

 

[beijingwalker]

Can China and Russia Squeeze Washington Out of Eurasia?
Posted: 10/06/2014 8:41 am EDT Updated: 3 hours ago
Can China and Russia Squeeze Washington Out of Eurasia? | Pepe Escobar

 

[beijingwalker]

Russia, China capable of defeating US in nuclear war: Prof. Fetzer
Tuesday Oct 07, 201403:39 PM GMT

An eminent American political commentator says Russia and China are capable of defeating the United Sates in a nuclear war.

In an interview with Press TV on Monday, Professor James Henry Fetzer also said that Americans must wake up to the fact that a nuclear exchange would kill hundreds of millions of people.

He said, “The very idea that the United States should be concerned that Russia and China are giving every indication that they are not going to back down from American and Western encroachment in the Middle East and in Eastern Europe, is incredibly naïve on the part of any American authorities because we have been undertaking one provocative action after another..

PressTV - Russia, China capable of defeating US in nuclear war: Prof. Fetzer

 

[BoQ77]

any individual has their own guess.

 

[general_yermolov_stalin]

Russia has a massive network of underground cities and tens of thousands of civil defense population bunkers along with massive grain storage facilities.

 

[beijingwalker]

China, Russia to Sign 30 Agreements During Annual Meet
Global Research, October 06, 2014

Russia and China will ink more than 30 agreements on energy, finance and high-speed rail cooperation during the annual Russia-China Prime Ministers summit to be held on 13 October, China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson announced on Saturday.
The two states’ premiers will also hold a meeting at the international forum Open Innovations on 14 October, said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei in Beijing. Russia has been attempting to shrug off its dependence on European energy markets and instead adopt a “look-east” policy towards China and India.

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang and Vice Premier Wang Yang will head for Russia for the 19th annual meet to hold talks with their Russian counterparts Dmitry Medvedev and Dmitry Rogozin.

The Prime Ministers summit this year follows successful meetings between President Xi Jinping and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin where the two leaders have overseen enormous Sino-Russian joint ventures, including a landmark $400 billion gas deal in Shanghai after a decade-long gas supply talks between the two countries.

Russia also plans to sign a new 30-year gas supply contract with China via the western route, Russian energy giant Gazprom’s CEO Alexei Miller told President Vladimir Putin last month.

As the US and EU step up pressure on Moscow with a new round of sanctions, Russia is seeking to strengthen ties with allies in the region, predominantly China.

Putin and Xi also met last month during a Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Council of Heads of State meet in Dushanbe, Tajikistan, where Putin batted for aligning China’s Silk Route revival project with Russian plans for a trans-Siberian railway.

“We see great potential in the idea of developing a common SCO transport system that would make use too of Russia’s Trans-Siberian Railway and Baikal-Amur Mainline and be tied into China’s plans for developing the Silk Road route. I am sure that big projects of this kind serve the interests of our organisation’s members and would benefit all countries in Eurasia,” said Putin.

Putin said earlier this year that the Sino-Russian ties, including those on approaches to international problems, are at an unprecedented level.

“As for our relations with China’s People’s Republic, they develop successfully and are at an unprecedentedly high level – both at the level of trust and the level of cooperation. I mean also the political sphere, our common approaches to estimations of international situations and to security in the world,” he said during a Q&A session in April in Moscow.

Russia’s trade turnover with China is almost thrice as big as that with the US.

“It is absolutely clear that we will be expanding collaboration with China. Our trade with the United States is 27.5 [billion], but trade with China is 87 billion, and it is growing. And experts will agree that China is gradually becoming the number one economic power. The question is when it will happen: in 15, 20 or 25 years. But everybody understands that it is inevitable,” asserted Putin.

The Russian and Chinese central banks have recently agreed on a draft currency swap agreement, which will allow them to increase trade in domestic currencies and cut the dependence on the US dollar in bilateral payments.

A Bloomberg report says the yuan-ruble trade on the Moscow Exchange has jumped 10-fold this year to $749 million in August.

Earlier last month, Moscow and Beijing have entered into a pact to boost use of the rouble and yuan for trade transactions.

The Chinese Premier will also visit Germany, Italy and the UN Food and Agricultural Organization(FAO) headquarters in Rome during his Europe trip and attend the 10th Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) summit in Milan from Oct. 16 to 17.

China, Russia to Sign 30 Agreements During Annual Meet | Global Research

 

[beijingwalker]

Without China, the sanctions imposed by the west on Russia can only be a pathetic joke.

 

[nomi007]

now china is in position to take tot benefit from high benefit from russians

 

[mike2000]

who even wrote this silly article?lool Russia and Chin can defeat the U.S in a 'NUCLEAR WAR'? More like insects/animals can defeat man if both 3 countries fight a nuclear war among themselves, since no human being will be left, hence only animals.insects will be the real winner.

 

[Superboy]

Even in conventional war the US would lose.

 

[500]

What philosophy professor can know about the nuclear war? Well its Press TV.

Even in conventional war the US would lose.

Naturally, since US lacks DSI.

 

[Oldman1]

Even in conventional war the US would lose.

Doubt that.

 

[AgentOrange]

Even in conventional war the US would lose.

Please stop trolling. Even China's own generals don't think the PLA is a match for the US armed forces and there exists a gap of about 20 years in certain areas. Therefore, I must assume that you are trolling. Or you ate paint chips as a boy and therefore your judgement is severely affected. Or both.

who even wrote this silly article?lool Russia and Chin can defeat the U.S in a 'NUCLEAR WAR'? More like insects/animals can defeat man if both 3 countries fight a nuclear war among themselves, since no human being will be left, hence only animals.insects will be the real winner.

Look at the source - pressTV (Iran). They often hope that Russia/China will do what Iran cannot vis a vis the US and the tone of their news reports reflects that. There was an entire segment last year about a Chinese quote - taken out of context of course - that stated China would extend its nuclear umbrella to include Iran. Where they got that, who the hell knows but it's probably the same place where they found this "scientist" who thinks any kind of nuclear conflict is "winnable."

 

[BoQ77]

who even wrote this silly article?lool Russia and Chin can defeat the U.S in a 'NUCLEAR WAR'? More like insects/animals can defeat man if both 3 countries fight a nuclear war among themselves, since no human being will be left, hence only animals.insects will be the real winner.

he think about apocalyse too early.

 

[beijingwalker]

Even in conventional war the US would lose.

It depends on where the war is fought, if the war were fought anywhere close to China and Russia, surely US will lose. see what happened in Korean war and Vietnam war.