What's new

The Great Game Changer: Belt and Road Intiative (BRI; OBOR)

Russia radar can not help china too moch,i am afraid,while AESA has been widely applied to J10,J11,J15,J16.

The sole ruusia can help china' aera tech now seems to be engine.
 
.
Between China and Russia, Which is the most dangerous country for the US. What are the good and bad things for people in the world and the US. one is Tiger, one is Lion and last one is pola Bear. These are the most aggressive in the jungle or the world.
 
.
Between China and Russia, Which is the most dangerous country for the US. What are the good and bad things for people in the world and the US. one is Tiger, one is Lion and last one is pola Bear. These are the most aggressive in the jungle or the world.
Economically china is bigger threat and militarily its russia.
 
. .
US is the biggest threat to mankind. From fabricated lies of Iraq WMD, to foolish intervention of Libya which create a massive illegal immigrant and terrorist problem. Then to irresponsible supply of weapons and funds to ISIS to destabilise Syria. Now they washed their hands on Europe immigrant problem when comes to Europe. When that is still not enough, they pick trouble and pick side in SCS and spur certain countries to go against another serve their own agenda.

USA is the satan of the world. The world shall rise up against this tyrants and monster.
 
Last edited:
.
Between China and Russia, Which is the most dangerous country for the US. What are the good and bad things for people in the world and the US. one is Tiger, one is Lion and last one is pola Bear. These are the most aggressive in the jungle or the world.

Both challenge the US from various angles: military, economics, culture, education etc.

US is not a singular power, as well. It is the leader of the Atlantic Pact and an amalgamation of the Western hegemony.

China is not a singular power, as well. Although not as institutionalized as the Atlantic Pact, China and Russia represent a new alternative historical bloc to the US-led Western hegemony.

So, I would say, in terms of real challenge, a China-Russia bloc is the most fundamental challenge the US faces in terms of the sustainability of its bloody grip on the world. That's the reason the US wages two silent wars on two fronts: One is with Russia and the other with China.

The rest is simply details or pieces on the board.

Then to irresponsible supply of weapons and funds to ISIS to destabilise Syria. Now they washed their hands on Europe problem when comes to Europe refugee problem.

That has not been entirely negative development, I think. The way the US panicked and how they watered down the number of refugees they promised to take from Syria&Iraq on the aftermath of Paris terror attacks must have taught Europe a practical lesson in the long run.

Do not get involved in grand strategies with the US, betting on the lives of other people, because, when the knife touches the nerve a bit, the US will simply shroud in its isolationism and let the Europe deal with the repercussions of ill-advised policies.
 
. . . .
Both challenge the US from various angles: military, economics, culture, education etc.

US is not a singular power, as well. It is the leader of the Atlantic Pact and an amalgamation of the Western hegemony.

China is not a singular power, as well. Although not as institutionalized as the Atlantic Pact, China and Russia represent a new alternative historical bloc to the US-led Western hegemony.

So, I would say, in terms of real challenge, a China-Russia bloc is the most fundamental challenge the US faces in terms of the sustainability of its bloody grip on the world. That's the reason the US wages two silent wars on two fronts: One is with Russia and the other with China.

The rest is simply details or pieces on the board.



That has not been entirely negative development, I think. The way the US panicked and how they watered down the number of refugees they promised to take from Syria&Iraq on the aftermath of Paris terror attacks must have taught Europe a practical lesson in the long run.

Do not get involved in grand strategies with the US, betting on the lives of other people, because, when the knife touches the nerve a bit, the US will simply shroud in its isolationism and let the Europe deal with the repercussions of ill-advised policies.

Excellent points.

Individually, Russia and China are not powerful enough to take on the US, but Russia and China combined would have all the necessary things to fully challenge the US such as:

Large land area.
Large population.
Large workforce.
Abundant natural resources (energy, metals, agriculture).
Large nuclear arsenal.
Large standing army.
Advanced conventional military weaponary (fighters jets, strategic bombers, strategic air transport, attack helicopters, transport helicopters, destroyers, frigates, conventional submarines, nuclear attack submarines, aircraft carrier, LPD, etc).
Advanced space program (satellites, launch facilities, manned, space station).
Satellite navigation system (GLONASS, Beidou).
Large and advanced missile arsenal (ICBM, IRBM, MRBM, SRBM, cruise missiles launched from land, air, sea and subsea).
Advanced nuclear ballistic submarines.
Advanced strategic bombers.
Advanced air and missile defences.
Advanced intelligence and counter intelligence.
Large economy.
Large trading nation.
Large investor.
Large savings pool.
Large consumer market.
Large industrial/manufacturing base.
Large service sector.
Large foreign exchange reserves.
Large gold reserves.
Large creditor nation.
Large stock market.
Large bond market.
Large government budget revenue.
Large government budget.
Highly educated population.
Large number of scientists.
Large number of engineers.
Large automobile producer.
Large shipbuilder.
Advanced technical knowledge on everything.
Advanced technologies in various industries (transportation, energy, medical, electronics, IT, etc)
Fastest supercomputer.
Large R&D budget.
Large military spending.
Large weapons exporter.
Ability to build large scale infrastructure rapidly.

Russia has things China wants, China has things Russia wants. If Russia and China combined, that will be a superpower combination capable of taking on anyone.
 
Last edited:
.
Individually, Russia and China are not a superpower. Russia has things China wants, China has things Russia wants. Russia and China combined will be a superpower combination as they would have all the necessary things to qualify as a superpower such as:

Large land area.
Large population.
Large workforce.
Abundant natural resources:
- energy
- metals
- agriculture
Large standing army.
Large nuclear arsenal.
Advanced conventional military weaponary:
- fighters jets
- strategic bombers
- strategic air transport
- attack helicopters
- transport helicopters
- destroyers
- frigates
- conventional submarines
- nuclear attack submarines
- aircraft carrier
- LPD
Advanced space program:
- launch facilities
- satellites
- manned
- space station
Satellite navigation system:
- GLONASS
- Beidou
Large and advanced missile arsenal
- ICBM
- IRBM
- MRBM
- SRBM
- land-launched cruise missiles
- air-launched cruise missiles
- ship-launched cruise missiles
- submarine-launched cruise missiles
Advanced nuclear ballistic submarines.
Advanced strategic bombers.
Advanced air and missile defences.
Advanced intelligence and counter intelligence.
Large economy.
Large trading nation.
Large investor.
Large savings pool.
Large consumer market.
Large industrial/manufacturing base.
Large service sector.
Large foreign exchange reserves.
Large gold reserves.
Large creditor nation.
Large stock market.
Large bond market.
Large government budget revenue.
Large government budget.
Large automobile producer.
Large shipbuilder.
Advanced technical knowledge on everything.
Advanced technologies in various industries:
- transportation
- energy
- medical
- electronics
- IT
Fastest supercomputer.
Highly educated population.
Large number of scientists.
Large number of engineers.
Large R&D budget.
Large number of patents owned.
Large military spending.
Large weapons exporter.
Ability to build large scale infrastructure rapidly.
Dominant in olympic sports.
 
Last edited:
. . . . .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom