TaiShang
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2014
- Messages
- 27,848
- Reaction score
- 70
- Country
- Location
If one convinces oneself that one's counterpart is unrelentingly hostile, even in the absence of evidence, it's not hard to see how conflict becomes more likely.
It is not a conviction. It is empirically-verified, contemporary reality -- that the US is unrelentingly hostile.
The author didn't substantiate either of the bolded statements.
Because the main theme of the article is not US hostilities toward China. It is only mentioned within the context of a contemporary development. The issue, nonetheless, has been (and being) mentioned in other places plenty of time and he does not have to put there "the pivot," "spying," "interference in domestic affairs" etc. etc., to convince the readership. It is just a waste of space.
It is these anti-American statements which make the article have an "anti-American slant," as I said.
Yet, none of them anti-American, since "American" refers to a people. Let say, it is anti-US (as a state-person) in the sense that it upholds China's interests over others' interests; separating regime from its people is always more convenient. Being anti-US is not being anti-American.
Predicting an undefined "inflammatory action" by the US against China, Russia, or Germany at some undefined point in the future is simple demonization, or in this specific case, anti-Americanism.
The author does not "predict." He does not use the word. He refers to a reality on the ground. We all know how the US is pressing certain European countries for a more hard-line stance toward Russia. And indeed, supporting Ukrainian separatism and thus putting a dent on Russia-Europe relations is more than "inflammatory."
Considering that neither of us had heard of the Beijing-Washington rail plan, it is reasonable to assume that the plan is, at best, merely an idea at the moment.
I guess, what he means by Beijing-Washington rail is not one across the Pacific, but, as an extension of the Beijing-Moscow rail, and across the Bering.
Nevertheless, if you agree with these ill-defined and unsubstantiated claims, I'll be happy to put you down as anti-American.
If your definition of anti-American is pro-China, yes, go ahead. But, still, I would wish to separate people from their governments which may or may not directly reflect their mandate. Hence, my pro-China stand is probably seen as anti-US by yourself, as I would decline to be anti-anybody. That is the reason, in the above post, I did not use the term, anti-American, which I consider a form of racism.
Even though I do not agree on many point with their regime, I respect the American people and wish them all the best.
The term "anti-Americanism" is more like an escape-clause in the hands of some US chauvinists.
Last edited: