What's new

The Future of Kashmir? "Seven" Possible Solutions!

Kashmir conflict began when Britain pulled out
Kashmir conflict began when Britain pulled out - thestar.com



The battle over Kashmir dates back to the post-World War II era when Britain was negotiating the independence of India and the creation of the Islamic nation of Pakistan.

Britain sent London lawyer Cyril Radcliffe to the subcontinent to draw up borders separating India and Pakistan. After two centuries of British rule, Radcliffe, on his first visit to the region, was given 40 days to finish his job.

While Muslim-dominated states were supposed to become a part of Pakistan, Jammu and Kashmir had a Hindu ruler, Hari Singh. He opted to go with India.

An agreement was reached for residents to decide their ultimate future – Indian or Pakistani – in a statewide plebiscite. India has refused to allow that to happen, saying the original UN-brokered ceasefire demands Pakistan demilitarize its side of the contested border before a vote.

In 1972, after their third war, in which after India helped East Pakistan gain independence as Bangladesh, the Line of Control was established in Kashmir.

For close to 20 years, there was an uncomfortable peace in the valley.

In 1989, disenchanted by repeatedly rigged elections and purportedly inspired by the collapse of the Berlin Wall, Kashmiris began to revolt. Militants trained in Pakistan to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan were redirected to Kashmir and steered across the Line of Control to attack Indian targets.

It became routine for Kashmiri boys to slip into Pakistan-controlled Kashmir for weapons training before returning home to battle for an independent state of Kashmir.

Since 1989, an estimated 50,000 people have died in the bloody, costly conflict.

By 2002, then-U.S. president Bill Clinton dubbed Kashmir "the most dangerous place on Earth."

Many attempts have been made to settle the dispute over Kashmir.

Between 1947 and 2008, 46 proposals were made by Pakistan, India and others.

The U.S. would like the conflict settled so Pakistan can concentrate its efforts on its western border with Afghanistan, a former U.S. diplomat said.

"The U.S. role in the Kashmir conflict has to be as subliminal as possible," said Thomas Pickering, a former U.S. ambassador to New Delhi.

Appointing a special American mediator to work with India and Pakistan wouldn't work because India, in particular, "has special genes to resist 'made by the U.S.' solutions," he said.

Pickering said he could envision a solution where Kashmir is ultimately granted autonomy comparable to that given to New Caledonia, an "overseas territory" of France, 2,000 kilometres off the shore from Sydney, Australia.
 
. . . . .
Tell me please............... is there any real solution of Kashmir :angry:

The only solution in sight is LoC becoming international border and its the best I think because no one have to sacrifice anything. But it will be difficult for India than Pakistan. Because a democratic govt will rarely do that because of losing votes. :hitwall:
 
. .
First stop the violence and covert militant support, then we can sit across the table and talk about a solution.

Lets not forget that during Musharraf era, we where almost an announcement away from the Kashmir solution. And it was also during his era that militant groups were banned and suppressed.
 
. . . .
Tell me please............... is there any real solution of Kashmir :angry:

I don't think there is any possible solution except making LOC permanent border.
Pakistan doesn't have anything substantial to offer to India to compensate for any loss of territory. India holds all the cards. Pakistan tried to play the terror card, but it failed.
India is quite comfortable with the present situation. Unless Pakistan comes up with something new to offer to India, the status-quo will continue.
 
. . .
Friendship , partnership , Central Asia , Afghanistan and list goes on like UN , OIC

Not good enough:coffee:
Friendship: Its 2 way street. Pakistan can give up its claim on Kashmir for the sake of Indo-Pak friendship

Partnership: For what?

Central Asia/Afghanistan: Clarify. You mean Pakistan gives India these countries in exchange for Kashmir? When did Pakistan own these countries? Why will India want them?
If you meant land access to CAR region, then I feel its not worth it. Access to Afghanistan/CAR via Pakistan is not the best option for India, even if the Indo-Pak relationship is most friendly. For India best option is via Iran, since Iran borders CAR. Access to CAR via Pakistan has to go via Afghanistan, which will be a big bottleneck. Also, CAR is not a big market from India's POV. Its a sparsely populated region. The GDP of combined CAR is insignificant. Also, CAR is already a backyard of Russia. China borders most of the CAR countries too.
Its only the Pakistanis who keep hyping about their Geo-strategic location for CAR. Once WoT is over and the American move out, even that will be gone.

UN, IOC : can you elaborate please??
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom