Myth_buster_1
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2008
- Messages
- 9,016
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
For all that I care, a killer whale could have downed it. I think the the Indian Navy was happy that the submarine was at the bottom of the ocean. How it got there mattered little.
My question is why do you feel the need to hide behind a possible fallacy that its own mine killed the submarine? Does this stem from a belief that Indians are inept and incapable of fighting. So the only rational explanation is that it must have been its own mine which took the submarine down.
Btw, what do you mean by me 'being an Indian'?
How am i hiding behind a possible fallacy?
But more important question is. Why do you feel that ghazi was indeed destroyed by Indian? Do you have any evidence to support your claim? Heck even IN has no evidence to support their claim.
Again. Repeating this for the third time for a person who lacks comprehension. If you would google a bit more on the subject other then lazy poorly researched Indian BS wikipedia reserach their are quite alot researches that provides better understanding of the subject. Ghazi was fallowing pre planned missions before setting of to mission. During its mine laying missions one of the mines detonated on its own or accidentally.
This thread starting article clearly states that Indian navy have not been able to find the cause of PN Ghazi destruction. If it was indeed destroyed by IN torpedo, mine, or depth charges then IN would have acknowledge this fact.