What's new

The Farce of Western Free Speech

The so-called “freedom of speech” is a Western plot to shape the ideology of everyone who might be in the way of total and utter Western domination。

The West control 99% of the world's media outlets,so the hypocrites are in a strong position to preach “freedom of speech”,knowing full well that the masses only ever HEAR Western speeches and expressions。

And when “freedom of speech” fails,these scumbags can and will always resort to military actions,i.e. bombing the sh1t out of those who dare to challenge the West's superiority and authority。
 
.
I think you have serious comprehension problem with English. Please read my previous posts where I clearly explained about law of land. I am not saying that law of land is cannot be biased, but you have no option but to follow.

My English comprehension is just fine.

What YOU seem to have trouble understanding is that, when a country's laws are hypocritical, then it is legitimate to point out the hypocrisy. No one is telling France what laws to pass, but we can certainly comment on any inherent hypocrisy.
 
.
I think you have serious comprehension problem with English. Please read my previous posts where I clearly explained about law of land. I am not saying that law of land is cannot be biased, but you have no option but to follow.

stop worrying about his understanding of english... start with your own... what is this "law of the land"?? does anyone outside india understand that phrase??

I am not saying that law of land is cannot be biased, but you have no option but to follow.

i was born into a religion created by a man who rejected the law of his land... and i am automatically a socialist... socialism, which again is not the law of the land in the nation i live.
 
.
My English comprehension is just fine.

What YOU seem to have trouble understanding is that, when a country's laws are hypocritical, then it is legitimate to point out the hypocrisy. No one is telling France what laws to pass, but we can certainly comment on any inherent hypocrisy.

Did I say not to be critical of the laws? Freedom of speech give you that freedom. But just because you are critical of the laws you cannot take law into your own hand.
 
.
My English comprehension is just fine.

What YOU seem to have trouble understanding is that, when a country's laws are hypocritical, then it is legitimate to point out the hypocrisy. No one is telling France what laws to pass, but we can certainly comment on any inherent hypocrisy.

Ofcourse ! There was a telling 'comment' on Charlie Hebdo recently and it quite efficiently i must say, pointed out the hypocrisy. :yes4:
 
.
Did I say not to be critical of the laws? Freedom of speech give you that freedom. But just because you are critical of the laws you cannot take law into your own hand.

Duh!
No one here is justifying the violence.

What we are discussing is the fact that there is a hypocrisy -- something which so many people aren't even willing to accept.
 
.
Killing tens of thousands of innocent people in Iraq、Afghanistan etc is not terrorism。

Killing a dozen of not-so-innocent people in the West is terrorism。

Killing by a hidden roadside bomb is terrorism。

Killing by an unseen UAV is not terrorism。
 
.
Like Sikh terrorists who highjacked the Air India planes back in Indra Gandhi's era or the Sikh terrorists who played the Golden temple's card just to get the sympathy from the world? Matter fact, the ones who shot and killed Indra Gandhi were Sikhs. What would you call them?
Now you declared me a Sikh just to prove you perverse points to condemn west while ignoring the fact that Sikhs militants were supported by a terrorist org called ISI.

Even Sikhs didn't killed non Sikhs in the name of relegion like for ex- Zhokhar Tsarnev bombed non Muslim in Boston merathan the same country which welcomed him with open hands.And i assume you heard about him don't you?
 
.
Killing tens of thousands of innocent people in Iraq、Afghanistan etc is not terrorism。

Killing a dozen of not-so-innocent people in the West is terrorism。

Killing by a hidden roadside bomb is terrorism。

Killing by an unseen UAV is not terrorism。

exactly... and i wonder what @ito and @arbit will say about that...
 
.
People seem to be seriously struggling to understand free speech, insulting race, sexuality is offensive, insulting religion has been happening for a long time, it's only Muslims that get angry. Hell on last weeks family guy they did a autopsy of jesus where he dies of cocaine and hookers, thats far more offensive buy no outrage. If you don't like smithing then dont read it, watch it.
 
.
Lol @ the amount of stupidity and innocence in one post.

I also think its the perfect time for 500 million people of E.U to remove cancer of few thousands of terrorists first, 1 million is a big shot.
I hope your brothers will not trace my I.P and Behead me just bcz i express my views freely.

Afterall free thinking is alien to your so called civilization.
 
.
Now you declared me a Sikh just to prove you perverse points to condemn west while ignoring the fact that Sikhs militants were supported by a terrorist org called ISI.

Even Sikhs didn't killed non Sikhs in the name of relegion like for ex- Zhokhar Tsarnev bombed non Muslim in Boston merathan the same country which welcomed him with open hands.And i assume you heard about him don't you?
No wonder you forgot to mention that Talibani leader was welcomed in Delhi. Who was fighting for the Golden temple and who was killing them? Both sides were Sikhs. The terrorists who were in the Golden temple were claiming that they are protecting the Golden temple and the ones who were killing were doing it for money. Should I remind you of a name of SARABJIT SINGH who detonated a bomb in Lahore's live market killing 20 innocent people? How about terrorist Surjeet Singh? A Sikh bombed the same country which welcomed his as a pilgrim. I am sure you heard about him also? Kharra Sach channel just released the i.d of 13 RAW terrorists and unsurprisingly, majority of them are Sikhs.

Now you declared me a Sikh just to prove you perverse points to condemn west while ignoring the fact that Sikhs militants were supported by a terrorist org called ISI.

This a quality of your kind that they blame ISI for everything though they know that their own backyard is dirty. Who is furling the BLA's terrorists? Do you have answer for that question?

Killing tens of thousands of innocent people in Iraq、Afghanistan etc is not terrorism。

Killing a dozen of not-so-innocent people in the West is terrorism。

Killing by a hidden roadside bomb is terrorism。

Killing by an unseen UAV is not terrorism。

There are very few people who accept their mistakes. Trust me! You are talking to a wall. They wont believe you.
 
Last edited:
.
Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom of insult. You have to be respectful for other people in your country.
 
.
No wonder you forgot to mention that Talibani leader was welcomed in Delhi. Who was fighting for the Golden temple and who was killing them? Both sides were Sikhs. Should I remind you of a name of SARABJIT SINGH who detonated a bomb in Lahore's live market killing 20 innocent people? A Sikh bombed the same country which welcomed his as a pilgrim. I am sure you heard about him also?
Taliban leader welcomed on Delhi???



I know Najeebullah family were given asylum after he was hanged by Taliban as non Muslim communist.
wasn't Pakistan was one of the country who recognized the Taliban regime in 90s

Both sides were Sikhs?? What's the point then.

were they involved in the blowing of WTO or any beheading of non Sikhs in west.

Also read the history of Sikhs how a peaceful sects were forced to beat arms in 17th century after some of their gurus were beheaded by Muslims which i think is a favorite practice "to instill fear in the heart of non Muslim"

why you didn't answer my question regarding the ISI role?
 
.
I hope your brothers will not trace my I.P and Behead me just bcz i express my views freely.

Afterall free thinking is alien to your so called civilization.

Dont worry me and my brothers are the same. They call stupid a stupid and move on.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom