What's new

The Economist - Discrepancy in Dhaka

Both are crap, but now we are in such a point where we have to decide who is shittier than whom.

That is famous Awami League template to equate Awami League criminal act when all Awami League deception fails and real crime get exposed. Are you sure you want to try that template?
 
Well you are exactly right!! Some fan boys infact orchestrated 21st August Grenade attack on the Opposition rally to wipe them out from the face of the earth. When your opponent is that desperate like what Razakar did in 71, you should not wait for the drama trial. War criminals should had been chased and killed in the month of Dec 1971.

Just because you say that somebody is a war-criminal does not make him so, get it in your thick skull. A fair trial has to find him guilty. Now, a fair trial is a foreign idea to thugs but law abiding citizens insist on a fair trial. Political thugs like you want to avoid a fair trial at any cost and that tells what you really want.
 
Only amardesh published the news and conversation. And in Dhaka you could not find a copy of Amardesh. Daily Star and Prothom alo and rest of awami league leaning media will not touch it because these are guilty on trial by political vendetta as well.


I read the conversation on the net in the morning but cannot get access to Amar Desh now. Most probably it has been blocked out by the thugs. These judges are outright thugs, people should form a tribunal to try these thugs.
 

I read the conversation on the net in the morning but cannot get access to Amar Desh now. Most probably it has been blocked out by the thugs. These judges are outright thugs, people should form a tribunal to try these thugs.

Most likely DoS attack on amardesh site buy Awami thug brigade.
 
Both are crap, but now we are in such a point where we have to decide who is shittier than whom.

The incumbent govt is always in the receiving end. Now you are looking for relief under BNP goons but in few years time you will again go after AL goons.

But before all- War criminals must be hanged starting with Allama Sayedi known as Delo Rajakar.

Just because you say that somebody is a war-criminal does not make him so, get it in your thick skull. A fair trial has to find him guilty. Now, a fair trial is a foreign idea to thugs but law abiding citizens insist on a fair trial. Political thugs like you want to avoid a fair trial at any cost and that tells what you really want.


In Bangldesh even a 3 years old kid knows who is war criminals. Well you wanted the trial drama.. so AL presented one. Be happy with it.. ;)

Most likely DoS attack on amardesh site buy Awami thug brigade.

hahahahahah
 
The incumbent govt is always in the receiving end. Now you are looking for relief under BNP goons but in few years time you will again go after AL goons.

But before all- War criminals must be hanged starting with Allama Sayedi known as Delo Rajakar.




In Bangldesh even a 3 years old kid knows who is war criminals. Well you wanted the trial drama.. so AL presented one. Be happy with it..


You're talking about AL and BNP goons, now, you may think that by doing so you can prove your fairness but we know better. You're as fair as the goons who are posing as the judges in the sham tribunal. As for a three year old kids knowing who is a war-criminal and who is not, most probably these kids received the evidence from people like you. Perhaps you should recommend the names of these kids as the 'hunourable' judges of the sham tribunal, I'm sure these kids are more qualified than the thugs who are sitting as the judges.
 
How do we know the tapes are authentic?

Perhaps you don't want to know that technology exists that can prove the authenticity of the tapes. Don't forget that it was recorded through skype. The way the tribunal judge reacted to the report tells a lot, but of course, indian imperialists won't pay attention to that.
 
In Bangldesh even a 3 years old kid knows who is war criminals. Well you wanted the trial drama.. so AL presented one. Be happy with it.. ;)

How so? were you present in war time? did you see him do war crimes?give us proof please and stop making yourself look so dumb :cry:

How do we know the tapes are authentic?

Because awami league
 
Perhaps you don't want to know that technology exists that can prove the authenticity of the tapes. Don't forget that it was recorded through skype. The way the tribunal judge reacted to the report tells a lot, but of course, indian imperialists won't pay attention to that.

Islamic Imperialist, technology may exist that proves recordings are genuine and forensic science sure can throw some light.

But how do we know THESE tapes are genuine? Anyone can create a tape, since the charge is serious and definitely a criminal offence, it will have to be proven. If you wish to convince not already convinced razakar sympathisers like zakira and dunie, the tapes will have to be proven to be authentic.

Because awami league

I'm afraid that is intelligent enough for BD section.
 
Islamic Imperialist, technology may exist that proves recordings are genuine and forensic science sure can throw some light.

But how do we know THESE tapes are genuine? Anyone can create a tape, since the charge is serious and definitely a criminal offence, it will have to be proven. If you wish to convince not already convinced razakar sympathisers like zakira and dunie, the tapes will have to be proven to be authentic.



I'm afraid that is intelligent enough for BD section.

The tapes are fabricated and phony made by jammati thugs to create controversy on the trial process.

Skype uses their own propitiatory encryption method on their voice/video communication and sniffing not going to work to hear the voice neither can record it from 3rd person.

Sorry to bust the myth.
 
The tapes are fabricated and phony made by jammati thugs to create controversy on the trial process.

Skype uses their own propitiatory encryption method on their voice/video communication and sniffing not going to work to hear the voice neither can record it from 3rd person.

Sorry to bust the myth.

no they are not. Judges didn't deny it. They just asked economist not to publish those. Economist also got their emails. Their passwords were hacked somehow.
 
The tapes are fabricated and phony made by jammati thugs to create controversy on the trial process.

Skype uses their own propitiatory encryption method on their voice/video communication and sniffing not going to work to hear the voice neither can record it from 3rd person.

Sorry to bust the myth.

@ So, Munshi, we find another diheart pro-Indian ???? I thought that fetch71 is making fun but once iajdani has seconded it so there is some truth on it. Infact, I never dreamed that it can be false ?????
 
Back
Top Bottom